Rhino EG - 80 Percent Success Rate with 19 Pip stoploss (由 forex_trader_165856)
該使用者已經刪除了這個系統。
Edit Your Comment
Rhino EG - 80 Percent Success Rate with 19 Pip stoploss討論
forex_trader_165856
會員從Dec 03, 2013開始
631帖子
Feb 26, 2015 at 12:17
會員從Dec 03, 2013開始
631帖子
The backtests were good, for Rhino EG. I happened to backtest on EURUSD today and the equity continued to rise from 2001 to 2015. I originally designed it for EURGBP, but possibly have more options than I thought. I'm running on live account as of today, but no trade history yet. I'll follow up in a month from real to demo and see if the comparison is close to the backtest.
This is a RR of 1:1 scalping Asian session. No grid, No Martingale. Just 1 trade at a time. Hard Stoploss on the trade. Slow and steady. More information will be provided soon.
This is a RR of 1:1 scalping Asian session. No grid, No Martingale. Just 1 trade at a time. Hard Stoploss on the trade. Slow and steady. More information will be provided soon.
會員從Nov 06, 2014開始
114帖子
forex_trader_165856
會員從Dec 03, 2013開始
631帖子
Mar 06, 2015 at 15:15
會員從Dec 03, 2013開始
631帖子
Neither. If you are trading and your position can't reach its goal within a certain amount of time, the system turns to recovery mode and exits the trade at Breakeven at first opportunity. This value is MinProfit and can be adjusted in all my systems. I use 1 pip because it would normally cover the cost of commission.
If trades are being closed out with 0 seconds, its a broker issue which means I need to turn up the slippage setting higher.
If trades are being closed out with 0 seconds, its a broker issue which means I need to turn up the slippage setting higher.
forex_trader_165856
會員從Dec 03, 2013開始
631帖子
Mar 09, 2015 at 10:53
會員從Dec 03, 2013開始
631帖子
Live account here - updated on myfxbook autoupdate once a day. ( Every 24 hours ). - https://www.myfxbook.com/members/RedRhinoLab/rhino-eg-real/1176188
會員從Feb 09, 2010開始
226帖子
Mar 12, 2015 at 13:02
會員從Feb 09, 2010開始
226帖子
Frank, I might buy this to diversify - what sort of profits and losses can I see per trade on an 10k account?
Also, I assume it would work just fine on the same broker account where I use RTP, VTP and my other EAs.
How actively does the EA trade?
Do you see this profitable long term?
Also, I assume it would work just fine on the same broker account where I use RTP, VTP and my other EAs.
How actively does the EA trade?
Do you see this profitable long term?
會員從Nov 06, 2014開始
114帖子
forex_trader_149646
會員從Sep 09, 2013開始
471帖子
Mar 13, 2015 at 11:56
會員從Sep 09, 2013開始
471帖子
The system trades maybe 1 -2 trades a day, but not everyday. It trades during certain hours and mostly during the slower Non Volatile sessions. You can use on any broker, but best to use ECN for an extra pip or two per trade.
You can use on same account as other EAs, just select a specific magic number for RhinoEG.
This EA is not highly optimized/curve fitted and it will be long term profitable just as backtest show.
With all my systems, I do not optimize for best setting because this makes a curve fitted system that will fail long term. If system is not profitable with my initial logic, I work on the logic to make it better and not from 'Finding' the curve fitting setting. Some developers find system , than optimize all possible indicator settings to show amazing Backtest, then the system fails on forward test.
This is from optimizing all possible variables until all bad trades are filtered out and only good trades are still in backtest, but Walk forward test fails miserably. Making a successful trading system must rely on sound logic and not from optimizing.
Through optimizing, we find characteristics of that Currency pair which are needed since each currency pair behaves differently and moves at different times. That is why optimizing helps through strategy development. It should not be used to optimize all variables to curve fit and then expect for forward test to follow results from historical data.
You can use on same account as other EAs, just select a specific magic number for RhinoEG.
This EA is not highly optimized/curve fitted and it will be long term profitable just as backtest show.
With all my systems, I do not optimize for best setting because this makes a curve fitted system that will fail long term. If system is not profitable with my initial logic, I work on the logic to make it better and not from 'Finding' the curve fitting setting. Some developers find system , than optimize all possible indicator settings to show amazing Backtest, then the system fails on forward test.
This is from optimizing all possible variables until all bad trades are filtered out and only good trades are still in backtest, but Walk forward test fails miserably. Making a successful trading system must rely on sound logic and not from optimizing.
Through optimizing, we find characteristics of that Currency pair which are needed since each currency pair behaves differently and moves at different times. That is why optimizing helps through strategy development. It should not be used to optimize all variables to curve fit and then expect for forward test to follow results from historical data.
會員從Nov 06, 2014開始
114帖子
會員從Feb 09, 2010開始
226帖子
forex_trader_165856
會員從Dec 03, 2013開始
631帖子
Mar 19, 2015 at 07:58
會員從Dec 03, 2013開始
631帖子
@Marketorder - Sorry about that - This should show all systems live trades updated every 5 minutes. https://redrhinofx.com/forex-signals/
@fxtrader10 - Real account updates with autoupdate on Daily basis by Myfxbook. I think it only updates Mon - Friday and may miss Friday afternoon if it updates in the morning and not again until Monday market open.
@fxtrader10 - Real account updates with autoupdate on Daily basis by Myfxbook. I think it only updates Mon - Friday and may miss Friday afternoon if it updates in the morning and not again until Monday market open.
forex_trader_165856
會員從Dec 03, 2013開始
631帖子
Apr 27, 2015 at 09:34
會員從Dec 03, 2013開始
631帖子
This strategy has a stoploss of 19 pips and takeprofit is variable while the algorithm will close trades with less profits if conditions are not optimal. This strategy by far has the best Risk/Reward ratio that RedRhinoFX offers today with a high accuracy rate.
RhinoEG has amazing backtests with Money management compounding - https://www.myfxbook.com/strategies/rhino-eg-mm-on-14/78066 - and with Fixed Lots. - https://www.myfxbook.com/strategies/rhino-eg-fixed-mm-14/78026
This strategy only enters 1 trade at a time - Trade at FIFO USA Brokers with low leverage - https://redrhinofx.com/rhino-eg/
It is also the easiest to use EA with no settings to adjust besides your Risk Per Trade.
Live account here - https://www.myfxbook.com/members/RedRhinoLab/rhino-eg-real/1176188
RhinoEG has amazing backtests with Money management compounding - https://www.myfxbook.com/strategies/rhino-eg-mm-on-14/78066 - and with Fixed Lots. - https://www.myfxbook.com/strategies/rhino-eg-fixed-mm-14/78026
This strategy only enters 1 trade at a time - Trade at FIFO USA Brokers with low leverage - https://redrhinofx.com/rhino-eg/
It is also the easiest to use EA with no settings to adjust besides your Risk Per Trade.
Live account here - https://www.myfxbook.com/members/RedRhinoLab/rhino-eg-real/1176188
會員從Apr 25, 2013開始
107帖子
forex_trader_165856
會員從Dec 03, 2013開始
631帖子
May 06, 2015 at 09:39
會員從Dec 03, 2013開始
631帖子
I am considering two methods.
A.) martingale because the losing cycle is rarely over 3
B.) minimalistic recovery. This will place smallest lotsize after a loss and once we have a winner it will return the standard lotsize. For example we trade with 1.0 Lot normally and we have a loser, then the next trade will be 0.01 , but if its a winner the 3rd trade will be back to normal 1.0 lotsize. If we have a loss, the next lotsize will be 0.01 and so on until we have a winner. B.) Is a suggestion from a customer who has an interesting idea that I'd like to put to the test. What do you think about option B?
A.) martingale because the losing cycle is rarely over 3
B.) minimalistic recovery. This will place smallest lotsize after a loss and once we have a winner it will return the standard lotsize. For example we trade with 1.0 Lot normally and we have a loser, then the next trade will be 0.01 , but if its a winner the 3rd trade will be back to normal 1.0 lotsize. If we have a loss, the next lotsize will be 0.01 and so on until we have a winner. B.) Is a suggestion from a customer who has an interesting idea that I'd like to put to the test. What do you think about option B?
會員從Nov 06, 2014開始
114帖子
forex_trader_165856
會員從Dec 03, 2013開始
631帖子
May 15, 2015 at 18:22
會員從Dec 03, 2013開始
631帖子
Broker Issue!
Rhino EG submits Fixed stoploss to the broker on entry to safe guard our investments, My live account had no slippage and closed at 19 pip stoploss while this Demo account experienced demo slippage from the fxopen ECN price feed.
You can see the real stoploss value in RED Block and the Entry price was the next column to the right at 0.73956 and the last column was the actual closed price of the order at 0.73228 .
A total slippage of more than 50 pips on Demo feed. Quite shocking but there's nothing we can do about it because we did the best that we can by submitting the stoploss to the broker.
Rhino EG submits Fixed stoploss to the broker on entry to safe guard our investments, My live account had no slippage and closed at 19 pip stoploss while this Demo account experienced demo slippage from the fxopen ECN price feed.
You can see the real stoploss value in RED Block and the Entry price was the next column to the right at 0.73956 and the last column was the actual closed price of the order at 0.73228 .
A total slippage of more than 50 pips on Demo feed. Quite shocking but there's nothing we can do about it because we did the best that we can by submitting the stoploss to the broker.
*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。