Advertisement
RubinFX_EA_V2.0 (由 rubinfx)
The user has made his system private.
RubinFX_EA_V2.0討論
.jpg)
會員從May 10, 2011開始
2帖子
Jul 27, 2015 at 16:13
I read many silly and inaccurate criticisms of this EA.
I read some serious reflection.
My idea is the following:
1) you can not trivialize this EA. Usually scam EA are simple and trivial. It seems obvious that this EA is very refined.
2) The results should be real as there are withdrawals (although, I suspect that some people can manipulate those too).
3) In a very short time, with a "time expiring" version, I noticed a conservative trading, a big attention to always have a small floating, then, in theory, a good MM. But a so complex EA cannot be judged in few days. It needs a long time. Official Myfxbook account has a good story ..... but here it opens the discussion on unverified account...
Some concerns raised by users are more legitimate:
1) Why do not account verified? The author could give us serious grounds. For example: "Initially it was not right then I have changed." Or: "Myfxbook copies the trade to resell the signal" ..... nothing.
But he should give an explanation, otherwise we could think bad.
2) Why sell an EA which is so good? The large funds would compete to use it! And the author would gain much, much, much more than selling it.
In conclusion: this EA (as presented) is beautiful. But, now the author has profoundly mistaken his marketing approach or... he wants to cheat us.
As I hope that the first hypothesis is valid, please, contact the author to clarify.
Happy trading to all.
I read some serious reflection.
My idea is the following:
1) you can not trivialize this EA. Usually scam EA are simple and trivial. It seems obvious that this EA is very refined.
2) The results should be real as there are withdrawals (although, I suspect that some people can manipulate those too).
3) In a very short time, with a "time expiring" version, I noticed a conservative trading, a big attention to always have a small floating, then, in theory, a good MM. But a so complex EA cannot be judged in few days. It needs a long time. Official Myfxbook account has a good story ..... but here it opens the discussion on unverified account...
Some concerns raised by users are more legitimate:
1) Why do not account verified? The author could give us serious grounds. For example: "Initially it was not right then I have changed." Or: "Myfxbook copies the trade to resell the signal" ..... nothing.
But he should give an explanation, otherwise we could think bad.
2) Why sell an EA which is so good? The large funds would compete to use it! And the author would gain much, much, much more than selling it.
In conclusion: this EA (as presented) is beautiful. But, now the author has profoundly mistaken his marketing approach or... he wants to cheat us.
As I hope that the first hypothesis is valid, please, contact the author to clarify.
Happy trading to all.
Jul 28, 2015 at 01:21
gigabrainy posted:
I read many silly and inaccurate criticisms of this EA.
I read some serious reflection.
My idea is the following:
1) you can not trivialize this EA. Usually scam EA are simple and trivial. It seems obvious that this EA is very refined.
2) The results should be real as there are withdrawals (although, I suspect that some people can manipulate those too).
3) In a very short time, with a "time expiring" version, I noticed a conservative trading, a big attention to always have a small floating, then, in theory, a good MM. But a so complex EA cannot be judged in few days. It needs a long time. Official Myfxbook account has a good story ..... but here it opens the discussion on unverified account...
Some concerns raised by users are more legitimate:
1) Why do not account verified? The author could give us serious grounds. For example: "Initially it was not right then I have changed." Or: "Myfxbook copies the trade to resell the signal" ..... nothing.
But he should give an explanation, otherwise we could think bad.
2) Why sell an EA which is so good? The large funds would compete to use it! And the author would gain much, much, much more than selling it.
In conclusion: this EA (as presented) is beautiful. But, now the author has profoundly mistaken his marketing approach or... he wants to cheat us.
As I hope that the first hypothesis is valid, please, contact the author to clarify.
Happy trading to all.
Not sure why you think its beautiful. Looks like a plain old marty to me.
會員從Dec 10, 2013開始
82帖子
Jul 30, 2015 at 15:54
with such a low DD, why are you not increasing the risk to make more profit? If you would allow max 10% dd you would have been a millionaire by now.
Is there a risk setting that you can increase?
Is there a risk setting that you can increase?
now or never!
會員從Dec 10, 2013開始
82帖子
Jul 30, 2015 at 16:22
Hey Ram, thanks for your feedback! I am on the verge of buying this EA though I would love to know how the developer thinks about my risk question.
now or never!
Jul 30, 2015 at 17:49
ramliam posted:
Just let everyone knows this is Not a scam it's more like master piece,I bought this EA 4 days ago and so far it's working great and I'm
getting great support.
This is very sophisticated MM approach built in.
Ram please put your account in mode "Public" to see if the EA really works
forex_trader_139412
會員從Jul 16, 2013開始
352帖子
Jul 30, 2015 at 20:19
ramliam posted:
I agree ,
Let's see,can you post link to you live account?
Can you? You say it is not a scam, but a masterpiece...but where is this account that you are running it on?
All I see is 'This user doesn't share any systems currently.'
Jul 31, 2015 at 06:06
hi all)
we write FAQ page http://rubinfx.com/torgovye-sovetniki-forex.html
Thank you all for the good reviews)
Abour Risk... yes, if you increse Risk increase profitability, but increase and drawdown. Unfortunately drawdown increases faster profitability. We are satisfied with the profit / risk of 20/4. It is our goal to profit was more than 5 times the possible loss.
Do you want more - please. Increase profits. We recommend that the default settings.
Good luck everyone!)
we write FAQ page http://rubinfx.com/torgovye-sovetniki-forex.html
Thank you all for the good reviews)
Abour Risk... yes, if you increse Risk increase profitability, but increase and drawdown. Unfortunately drawdown increases faster profitability. We are satisfied with the profit / risk of 20/4. It is our goal to profit was more than 5 times the possible loss.
Do you want more - please. Increase profits. We recommend that the default settings.
Good luck everyone!)
會員從Dec 10, 2013開始
82帖子
Jul 31, 2015 at 07:30
hmm I do see something "fishy" here on my trial. My profits are equal to my floating and both keep growing... I am wondering how you can withdraw profits if floating keeps growing?
now or never!
會員從May 04, 2012開始
1534帖子
Jul 31, 2015 at 07:36
Atsiekratsie posted:
hmm I do see something "fishy" here on my trial. My profits are equal to my floating and both keep growing... I am wondering how you can withdraw profits if floating keeps growing?
I suspect manual 'craftsmanship'... Russians are really good at it...
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
會員從May 04, 2012開始
1534帖子
Jul 31, 2015 at 07:48
(已編輯Jul 31, 2015 at 07:50)
It seems that the EA is able to make cashable profits only for the seller...
Now, in two ways...
I always knew that the Russians can outsmart other nations... My ex-wife is Russian, and she has managed to outsmart me, too, but she did it only after getting her greencard... 😇 Since then I am VERY careful with Russians... Even Angela Merckel is careful with them...
Now, in two ways...
I always knew that the Russians can outsmart other nations... My ex-wife is Russian, and she has managed to outsmart me, too, but she did it only after getting her greencard... 😇 Since then I am VERY careful with Russians... Even Angela Merckel is careful with them...
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
.jpg)
