Three Pairs 2400 (由 bestdarngood)
收益: | +52.21% |
縮減 | 25.23% |
點: | -1191.3 |
交易 | 401 |
贏得: |
|
損失:。 |
|
類型: | 真實 |
杠杆率: | 1:50 |
交易: | 自動的 |
Edit Your Comment
Three Pairs 2400討論
會員從Dec 04, 2010開始
1447帖子
會員從Dec 04, 2010開始
1447帖子
Feb 21, 2017 at 08:22
會員從Dec 04, 2010開始
1447帖子
I just found the link on mql5 very interesting indeed. The return you have been getting on fxcm is much much higher than the expected return you talk about in the marketplace on mql5... why do you think this is? The monthly return to drawdown ratio is excellent on a 1:50 leveraged account.
會員從Dec 04, 2010開始
1447帖子
會員從Nov 12, 2010開始
160帖子
Feb 21, 2017 at 10:05
(已編輯Feb 21, 2017 at 10:09)
會員從Nov 12, 2010開始
160帖子
It was verified at one time, not sure why it got unverified. Just took care of it again.
I actually have two different EAs, a Fully Hedged and a Non Hedged 3 Pair EA. This one is the Fully Hedged one https://www.myfxbook.com/members/bestdarngood/fxcm-5000-d1/1822431
While the one you mention is not Fully Hedged and is more profitable because it can open/close more trades.
Both of them open trades when there are inefficiencies in the market (When the pairs are not in sync). For the Non Hedged one, it then can close a trade in profit fairly quickly because there is an overall direction being traded.
With the Fully Hedged one, a trade may take more time as the market will take more time to get more bias in the overall trade, but it is safer to use as you can trade more lots and be able to handle adverse market conditions.
Here is how to look at that it can work as an abnormal example. Take the current prices of 3 Fully Hedged Pairs such as Selling AUDUSD, Buying EURUSD, and Selling EURAUD. Then if they all went to a price of 1.00000, what kind of profit or loss would you make? You are basically opening at a bias, and then as the prices change, you are seeing a change in exposure to the pairs which produces an overall profit or loss.
Depending on which one you want, the fully hedged version is sold on the MQL4 marketplace, while this other one is only run on accounts where I take a 25% commission of profits monthly.
Regarding DD, I am running the risk quite high currently on the Three Pairs 2400. I plan to reduce my risk at the balance goes up as even though there should be a 90% or higher win rate (currently 100% win rate when you take 3 pairs as an overall trade), I am risk adverse and plan to not lose profits.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
I actually have two different EAs, a Fully Hedged and a Non Hedged 3 Pair EA. This one is the Fully Hedged one https://www.myfxbook.com/members/bestdarngood/fxcm-5000-d1/1822431
While the one you mention is not Fully Hedged and is more profitable because it can open/close more trades.
Both of them open trades when there are inefficiencies in the market (When the pairs are not in sync). For the Non Hedged one, it then can close a trade in profit fairly quickly because there is an overall direction being traded.
With the Fully Hedged one, a trade may take more time as the market will take more time to get more bias in the overall trade, but it is safer to use as you can trade more lots and be able to handle adverse market conditions.
Here is how to look at that it can work as an abnormal example. Take the current prices of 3 Fully Hedged Pairs such as Selling AUDUSD, Buying EURUSD, and Selling EURAUD. Then if they all went to a price of 1.00000, what kind of profit or loss would you make? You are basically opening at a bias, and then as the prices change, you are seeing a change in exposure to the pairs which produces an overall profit or loss.
Depending on which one you want, the fully hedged version is sold on the MQL4 marketplace, while this other one is only run on accounts where I take a 25% commission of profits monthly.
Regarding DD, I am running the risk quite high currently on the Three Pairs 2400. I plan to reduce my risk at the balance goes up as even though there should be a 90% or higher win rate (currently 100% win rate when you take 3 pairs as an overall trade), I am risk adverse and plan to not lose profits.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
See my profile or message me for my latest EA
會員從Dec 04, 2010開始
1447帖子
會員從Nov 12, 2010開始
160帖子
Feb 21, 2017 at 15:24
會員從Nov 12, 2010開始
160帖子
There are different TP/SL and other settings. In both cases, the pairs trade as a set to help protect you against large market moves that trading one pair doesn't provide, but in the fully hedged program, you are just better protected, but to counter that with the other program, you just need to trade smaller lots in order to limit the risk. The Non Hedged program is more like a Basket Trading Program but with only 3 pairs.
See my profile or message me for my latest EA
Feb 21, 2017 at 15:45
會員從Sep 29, 2016開始
255帖子
ourmyfxbook@
會員從Nov 12, 2010開始
160帖子

*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。