Advertisement
watch this video. can be interesting
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 06, 2011 at 19:22
you can visit the link and see the dıscussion
walker
http://www.myfxbook.com/community/trading-systems/acme-hedge-aggressive/85946,7
walker
http://www.myfxbook.com/community/trading-systems/acme-hedge-aggressive/85946,7
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 06, 2011 at 22:20
(편집됨 Dec 06, 2011 at 22:20)
this is proof of my only buy strategy
every 00:00 go long for eurusd
TP 5 pip
in 10 years
every 00:00 go long for eurusd
TP 5 pip
in 10 years
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 06, 2011 at 22:20
walker36 posted:
this is proof of my only buy strategy
every 00:00 go long for eurusd
TP 5 pip
in 10 years
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 07, 2011 at 01:55
from FB
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 07, 2011 at 02:07
AMCE_Managed_LOL EA added to my portfolio
have fun until Blow
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/walker36/amce-managed-lol/204169
have fun until Blow
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/walker36/amce-managed-lol/204169
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 07, 2011 at 19:16
guys and gals
what I am thinking is, there are bunch of Robots in the market with very good straight up equity curve BT result.
BUT when those put into Forward Test the realty is totally different from the BT results. even for the most popular ones or the expensive ones the result is the same.
so what is in my mind is all those robots including the self coded ones are just somehow high or low level optimized and the FT results are totally different.
at that point the solution is there should be robot that coded with the basic rules of the market with > 1Hr chart and can trade more then one pair with that basic rules. "0" optimization.
I guess this is the real solution for the consistant profitable system.
Lets think about 2007. in 2007 price actions happens most of the the time in 1 bar at 1Hr chart. but in 2011 it takes 10-15 bars to happen. any system can not handle both situations. and algo switching system is extreemly complicated.
so from now on I will focus the most simple and basic algo that can trade with multi pairs.
walker
what I am thinking is, there are bunch of Robots in the market with very good straight up equity curve BT result.
BUT when those put into Forward Test the realty is totally different from the BT results. even for the most popular ones or the expensive ones the result is the same.
so what is in my mind is all those robots including the self coded ones are just somehow high or low level optimized and the FT results are totally different.
at that point the solution is there should be robot that coded with the basic rules of the market with > 1Hr chart and can trade more then one pair with that basic rules. "0" optimization.
I guess this is the real solution for the consistant profitable system.
Lets think about 2007. in 2007 price actions happens most of the the time in 1 bar at 1Hr chart. but in 2011 it takes 10-15 bars to happen. any system can not handle both situations. and algo switching system is extreemly complicated.
so from now on I will focus the most simple and basic algo that can trade with multi pairs.
walker
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 07, 2011 at 19:32
plus
if you are trading with TL s your Long and Short Algo must be different from each other due to gravity effect ı have mentioned at earlier posts
if you are trading with TL s your Long and Short Algo must be different from each other due to gravity effect ı have mentioned at earlier posts
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 07, 2011 at 20:03
FYI
2011 is the one of the tough year for EURUSD. most of the algos doing well with past years are faling in 2011
BTW may be soon there will not be EURUSD pair to trade.
walker
2011 is the one of the tough year for EURUSD. most of the algos doing well with past years are faling in 2011
BTW may be soon there will not be EURUSD pair to trade.
walker
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 07, 2011 at 20:06
ok guys
here last 10 years EURUSD and NZDUSD 4 hr chart only BUY results
same EA same setup NULL optimization with basic trading TL rules 125 pip TP 250 pip SL
here last 10 years EURUSD and NZDUSD 4 hr chart only BUY results
same EA same setup NULL optimization with basic trading TL rules 125 pip TP 250 pip SL
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 07, 2011 at 20:09
the issue is if I code exit regarding to the TL s both in profit and Loss the result is BE. so there should be a level definition for exit.
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 07, 2011 at 20:26
GBPUSD
same as above
same as above
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 07, 2011 at 22:36
when I WAS coding an EA I always code both Long and short togather and reverse of each other. now I have change my work and first coding the Long. when completed will work on short. and those will not be mirrored code.
walker
walker
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 08, 2011 at 14:46
EURUSD 1 HR chart started to be the same as year 2007. reactions happens is 1 bar. I advise the manual traders switch to 15 min chart who is trading with 1Hr. bad days Ahead.
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 08, 2011 at 15:02
I also advise the Auto traders to suspend their robots for until next year first week. ( Live accounts )
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 08, 2011 at 15:34
an advise for EURUSD
long entry PULLBACK
short entry BREAKOUT
when going Long BREAKOUT fails more then PULLBACK
when going Short PULLBACK fails more then BREAKOUT
this combination is better then both PULLBACK or both BREAKOUT
long entry PULLBACK
short entry BREAKOUT
when going Long BREAKOUT fails more then PULLBACK
when going Short PULLBACK fails more then BREAKOUT
this combination is better then both PULLBACK or both BREAKOUT
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 08, 2011 at 15:36
another important advise
if you are looking BAR OPEN or BAR CLOSE for BREAKOUT you should check both
CLOSE[1] >Level
&& OPEN[0]>Level
they both should BREAKOUT
walker
if you are looking BAR OPEN or BAR CLOSE for BREAKOUT you should check both
CLOSE[1] >Level
&& OPEN[0]>Level
they both should BREAKOUT
walker
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 08, 2011 at 17:52
Ski Jump Roman Koudelka Just had a serious accident
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 08, 2011 at 20:38
IMPORTANT
end of year
some brokers want to balance their Balance sheet so the best way is blowing some accounts. and for this is the best way changing the leverage and this will cause margin call for some accounts.
BE CAREFUL about leverage. if you have open trades and if you are swing trader check your account leverage daily.
walker
end of year
some brokers want to balance their Balance sheet so the best way is blowing some accounts. and for this is the best way changing the leverage and this will cause margin call for some accounts.
BE CAREFUL about leverage. if you have open trades and if you are swing trader check your account leverage daily.
walker
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 20, 2011 at 10:02
explanation will follow later
forex_trader_36599
May 13, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1329
Dec 20, 2011 at 10:08
TcProArbitrage demo test has been stopped due the %50 loss
it is a commercial EA which you can find here at MFB but I dont advise to use
it is a commercial EA which you can find here at MFB but I dont advise to use
