Americans should read this...

May 10, 2012 at 14:26
1,112 개의 뷰
11 Replies
TheCyclist
forex_trader_28881
Feb 07, 2011 부터 멤버   게시물724
May 10, 2012 at 14:26
https://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/05/08/bloomberg_articlesM2B0ZW6JTSEG01-M3QL4.DTL

Sorry guys, I feel for you...but it is action time. Got to get off that chair and go do something about this or lose what America was supposed to be.
TheCyclist
forex_trader_28881
Feb 07, 2011 부터 멤버   게시물724
May 10, 2012 at 14:33
Please note that it is your government that is making it so difficult for the rest of the world to do business with you that they rather chose not to. Main stream business. Read the names in that list. It's just easier and you simply don't have that much money anymore. The wealth is in the east now.

If you guys don't catch this and fix this, your future is bleak indeed.

Nov 27, 2010 부터 멤버   게시물244
May 10, 2012 at 18:00 (편집됨 May 10, 2012 at 18:08)
This is crazy part, 'The definition includes citizens, green-card holders and non-Americans deemed U.S. residents by being present in the country for at least 183 days over a three-year period, which makes them subject to U.S. tax on their worldwide income, according to the IRS.'

Even being a foreign national, if you spend an average of 2 months in the US for the last 3 years, your worldwide income is taxable. I was thinking about how ridiculous it would be that the income generated in the remainder 30 months spent working elsewhere would be taxable by the IRS, but then it can't be that dumb. Double taxation gets called into play and I recall reading something about how it will only be taxed if you are not paying taxes in your home country. Sorry, just having a conversation with myself.
Consistency above all.
Nov 27, 2010 부터 멤버   게시물244
May 10, 2012 at 18:37
There's also a hint of protectionism here, on 2 levels.

1. The incumbent American banks having no choice but to be compliant, have their revenue increased from American investors exiting (or being rejected) from non-compliant non-US banks. Of course, it can construed that being compliant is an open choice, however, it is a choice where the foreign bank has to consciously decide to pick customers whose profit margin generated is less. And any business that chooses increased revenue over better margins is typically in a bad situation, where it needs to cover fixed costs more than increase its profits. So basically American banks benefit from this legislation.

2. If it is difficult to invest in non-US assets, where are American tax residents going to place their funds in? So basically America benefits.

All in, quite smart, but strongly hypocritical.
Consistency above all.
Nov 27, 2010 부터 멤버   게시물244
May 10, 2012 at 18:39
I meant 2 months per year in the earlier post.
Consistency above all.
Nov 27, 2010 부터 멤버   게시물244
May 11, 2012 at 18:51
This is an example of the fallout to be expected.

Facebook Co-Founder Saverin Renounces Citizenship
https://www.cnbc.com/id/47389619
Consistency above all.
TheCyclist
forex_trader_28881
Feb 07, 2011 부터 멤버   게시물724
May 14, 2012 at 00:07
Ya I'm not sure of it's that easy. From what I understand USA is the only government in the world that can force you to keep your citizenship if they believe you are trying to renounce it for tax reasons...
Nov 27, 2010 부터 멤버   게시물244
May 14, 2012 at 08:15 (편집됨 May 14, 2012 at 08:15)
I imagine it will be difficult to force anyone to do so. On threat of incarceration? Wouldn't really matter if you are already a citizen of another place.

I suppose if it is labelled a crime and if the new residential country has a extradition treaty with the US then it might be possible. But I think it would be a stretch.

And Saverin was from Brazil to being with.
Consistency above all.
TheCyclist
forex_trader_28881
Feb 07, 2011 부터 멤버   게시물724
May 14, 2012 at 09:02 (편집됨 May 14, 2012 at 09:02)
All I can say is thank **** I'm not American...those guys need to riot in the streets to get their freedom back.
myfxpt
forex_trader_43716
Aug 06, 2011 부터 멤버   게시물345
May 16, 2012 at 20:51
How typical of government these days...the BIG guys are allowed to do the damage, often in bed with the government, but the little guy pays the price time and time again. Why on earth American's are prohibited from trading Gold and Silver, for example, is just beyond my comprehension. How did the free enterprise centre of the world become the nanny state it is right now? It is an insult to America's forefathers!
May 21, 2012 부터 멤버   게시물33
Jun 16, 2012 at 09:46
Item Not Found

The article or page you requested was not found. If this link was sent to you via e-mail or posted on another website, it was probably incorrectly formatted.

If the link that gave you the error appeared on one of The Gate's pages, please mail us and let us know at [email protected].


Yes, I think some rioting would do us some good. I believe that we should be made (very clearly) aware of the risks of FX trading but not regulated so much...
There are risk-lovers and there are risk-haters, but the best traders will take the risk as long as they get paid for it.
May 23, 2012 부터 멤버   게시물65
Jun 18, 2012 at 10:48
Just to add some explanations about the '2 months per year for 3 years' US residence raidenworks was talking about ealier in this post, it is really in fact approx. 4 months per year as year -1 only counts for 1/3 and year -2 only counts for 1/8 of days of presence.

If you calculate the 'average' maximum presence per year you can be in the US to *NOT* be considered tax resident for 3 years, it is 125 days per year (125+125/3+125/8=182,29), which is aprox. 4 months.
An average of 126 days per year would be too much ! (126+126/3+126/8=183,75)

Raidenworks (thanks!) kindly sent me the IRS link by private message about this:
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p519.pdf
Page 4, under 'Substantial Presence Test'
로그인 / 가입하기 to comment
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.