Advertisement
Important - Auto Update Issue
forex_trader_3734
Nov 26, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물33
May 30, 2013 at 09:38
Apr 22, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물122
May 30, 2013 at 11:08
jagui posted:
http://forum.mql4.com/55860
Renat 2013.05.30 12:37
So funny complains. Read again: they hacked our network protocols and created illegal services. You are a user of illegal service.
Renat, seems you are very happy... lol
then, try to explain what the VPS providers hacked???
May 30, 2013 at 12:56
Need help....
In Pepperstone... They doesnt have publisher... when I try in Option>FTP... simply because it just looks like in Publisher's menu, the Journal report was : 2013.05.30 19:52:30 TemplateFile: cannot open the template file
Any advice?
In Pepperstone... They doesnt have publisher... when I try in Option>FTP... simply because it just looks like in Publisher's menu, the Journal report was : 2013.05.30 19:52:30 TemplateFile: cannot open the template file
Any advice?
Cent account matter$
forex_trader_91886
Sep 18, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물143
May 30, 2013 at 12:58
I think Metaquotes had stated that there will be some implications for third party mt4 firms soon........I will try to find the article and post it on here.............I remember reading up on it and it was noted that sites like mt4i would be affected......so that might all be part of it......
Dec 10, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물23
May 30, 2013 at 12:58
(편집됨 May 30, 2013 at 13:00)
I suggest myfxbook implements the auto-update feature through internet proxies. Choose a random proxy to update each account, this should get around all the problems from Metaquotes attempting to block large number of connections from a single IP or the myfxbook IP addresses. You can get a list of free proxies here: http://hidemyass.com/proxy-list/.
May 30, 2013 at 13:16
What the best solution?
Publisher: error when building the report 'C:\Program Files (x86)\MetaTrader - Pepperstone\profiles\statement.htm'
@danielfppps : should we use free proxies? or myfxbook should?
Publisher: error when building the report 'C:\Program Files (x86)\MetaTrader - Pepperstone\profiles\statement.htm'
@danielfppps : should we use free proxies? or myfxbook should?
Cent account matter$
Dec 10, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물23
May 30, 2013 at 13:24
Myfxbook should, they can route their connections to MT4 servers through free proxies, thus eliminating any possible filtering that Metaquotes might make on their servers. If they have 70K+ accounts, they can route them through 100 free proxies, having only 700 connections per proxy which if they divide evenly amongst brokers would result in no disconnection issues (I believe). Worth a try at least.
Dec 10, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물23
May 30, 2013 at 13:35
mmm... well myfxbook can also pay for proxies http://proxybonanza.com/ which would allow for added security/control
May 30, 2013 at 13:53
hi all, one question: form what I got installi myfxbook EA should represent a working alternative, I have only one concern about it: will an additional EA working affect, even barely, performance of other ea/broker/vps? will executions feel even a minimum effect?
If someone can assure it won't, I think I'll follow that way
thanx to all
m.
If someone can assure it won't, I think I'll follow that way
thanx to all
m.
forex_trader_72498
Apr 05, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물93
May 30, 2013 at 17:45
emmeci76 posted:
hi all, one question: form what I got installi myfxbook EA should represent a working alternative, I have only one concern about it: will an additional EA working affect, even barely, performance of other ea/broker/vps? will executions feel even a minimum effect?
If someone can assure it won't, I think I'll follow that way
thanx to all
m.
Working EA may affect all those things you mentioned only in that way that it takes a fraction of computer/vps CPU. I just checked it for myself and found that with 9 working MT4 platforms, each of them now having 2 EAs (one trading EA + Myfxbook EA), I have CPU usage between 4% and 7%. Before this story with an autoupdate 9 EAs took not more than 5%. But 7% is still far from any negative effect on a performance, so you may not worry about it!
Also I have another good news! 4 of my 9 accounts are now verified. It took almost 24 hrs, but we must understand that 70K+ accounts became not verified at once. I hope that everything is going to be OK! Bravo Ethan, keep going!
Apr 22, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물122
May 30, 2013 at 18:42
do not take so seriously himself, sometimes it hurts... I personally will look for alternatives of Metaqoutes, there are such...
첨부 파일:
forex_trader_72498
Apr 05, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물93
May 30, 2013 at 21:29
Finally all my accounts are verified by now! Great job of Myfxbook staff despite of all attempts to sink the service!!!
Dec 10, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물23
May 31, 2013 at 02:52
(편집됨 May 31, 2013 at 02:52)
I just wrote an open letter to Metaquotes: http://mechanicalforex.com/2013/05/an-open-letter-to-metaquotes.html, which I wanted to share with you. I bet many of you feel the same way
forex_trader_54977
Nov 29, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1
May 31, 2013 at 05:36
The ea-connector-program is not a solution at all. It needs .net-Framework 3.5 and its difficult to install it on windows server or a server which runs xp (without admin-rights). Why did it all change it worked great for years???
