Jarratt Davis;s student

Feb 13, 2016 at 10:02
1,925 개의 뷰
24 Replies
Dec 05, 2015 부터 멤버   게시물6
Feb 13, 2016 at 10:02
Is there anyone here who is the student of jarratt davis and has been trading using his style
May 20, 2011 부터 멤버   게시물724
Feb 14, 2016 at 07:29
those who teach cant do, those who do don't teach
Aug 27, 2017 부터 멤버   게시물994
Dec 24, 2017 at 09:47
Is he a mentor? What’s the weapon of his trading? No idea about him.
Sep 01, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물10
Dec 24, 2017 at 15:57
JD's approach is using fundamentals. He has tons of video out there explaining his approach.
Jun 20, 2014 부터 멤버   게시물41
Dec 25, 2017 at 08:01
FXtrader2010 posted:
those who teach cant do, those who do don't teach[/quote

Thank you for your advice
Apr 18, 2017 부터 멤버   게시물920
Dec 25, 2017 at 15:54
Dove777 posted:
JD's approach is using fundamentals. He has tons of video out there explaining his approach.

Thank you very much for you info! Is it free or paid service?
Dec 25, 2017 부터 멤버   게시물24
Dec 26, 2017 at 08:01
FXtrader2010 posted:
those who teach cant do, those who do don't teach

Really?
Sep 01, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물10
Dec 26, 2017 at 08:01
AniLorak posted:
Dove777 posted:
JD's approach is using fundamentals. He has tons of video out there explaining his approach.

Thank you very much for you info! Is it free or paid service?

There are a couple of sources where you can get access to some free videos to understand JD's approach, his website Jarratt Davis and just do a search in you tube. The core training is a professional traders programme for $1997 which I believe is still offered at $997.
Jarrat's track record is verified and ranked by Barclay Hedge, a service that ranks professional fund managers.
 
https://imgur.com/7vFnhmY
Aug 19, 2013 부터 멤버   게시물9
Dec 26, 2017 at 08:01
Unless any self-proclaimed 'mentor' out there can show a self-owned, consistent, long-term third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy, then he remains a total fraud in my book.

Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.

How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.

Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.
A Universal Algorithm. A Trading Edge in ANY Market.
Jan 08, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물281
Dec 26, 2017 at 12:28
Dove777 posted:
Jarrat's track record is verified and ranked by Barclay Hedge, a service that ranks professional fund managers.


And all of them with very low or even negative returns ! 😑
Lousy !
Complexity is expensive, inefficient, and ineffective > Crocodile trading
mmltd
forex_trader_449466
Aug 04, 2017 부터 멤버   게시물31
Dec 26, 2017 at 15:46
SwapTrader posted:
FXtrader2010 posted:
those who teach cant do, those who do don't teach

Really?

Obviously. There is more money to be made on the market if someone knows what he is doing than by teaching someone. If any trader spends time on mentoring from monday to friday, when he could be making 10 times the money by trading, he simply doesn't know how to trade.
Aug 27, 2017 부터 멤버   게시물994
Dec 26, 2017 at 15:46
fxphysics posted:
Unless any self-proclaimed 'mentor' out there can show a self-owned, consistent, long-term third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy, then he remains a total fraud in my book.

Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.

How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.

Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.

So, what’s your guideline for the new Forex traders who want to learn Forex?
mmltd
forex_trader_449466
Aug 04, 2017 부터 멤버   게시물31
Dec 26, 2017 at 15:48
My message here got deleted. I posted that whoever can trade is not going to waste time by teaching others, but for whatever reason someone didn't like my message. For me thats confirmation I was right.
mmltd
forex_trader_449466
Aug 04, 2017 부터 멤버   게시물31
Dec 26, 2017 at 15:48
Well, now its back...this forum can be weird sometimes. 😲
Apr 18, 2017 부터 멤버   게시물920
Dec 27, 2017 at 07:47
Dove777 posted:
AniLorak posted:
Dove777 posted:
JD's approach is using fundamentals. He has tons of video out there explaining his approach.

Thank you very much for you info! Is it free or paid service?

There are a couple of sources where you can get access to some free videos to understand JD's approach, his website Jarratt Davis and just do a search in you tube. The core training is a professional traders programme for $1997 which I believe is still offered at $997.
Jarrat's track record is verified and ranked by Barclay Hedge, a service that ranks professional fund managers.
 
https://imgur.com/7vFnhmY

Thank you very much for your info; now it’s time to research on him.
Sep 01, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물10
Dec 27, 2017 at 07:49
Croco_Dile posted:

And all of them with very low or even negative returns ! 😑
Lousy !

That is the best results professionals can deliver. You seem to suggest that your own performance is much better. Would you care to share your own verified results to demonstrate your comments are not hollow.
Aug 19, 2013 부터 멤버   게시물9
Dec 27, 2017 at 15:06
Adribaasmet posted:
fxphysics posted:
Unless any self-proclaimed 'mentor' out there can show a self-owned, consistent, long-term third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy, then he remains a total fraud in my book.

Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.

How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.

Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.

So, what’s your guideline for the new Forex traders who want to learn Forex?

My guideline is to learn mathematics and/or physics, and start learning how science (true science i.e. observable, replicable, univocal) can help you find a viable expectancy. The information is out there for free in currency terms. But you will have to pay with time and efforts.
A Universal Algorithm. A Trading Edge in ANY Market.
Sep 01, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물10
Dec 28, 2017 at 12:00
fxphysics posted:
Adribaasmet posted:
fxphysics posted:
Unless any self-proclaimed 'mentor' out there can show a self-owned, consistent, long-term third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy, then he remains a total fraud in my book.

Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.

How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.

Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.

So, what’s your guideline for the new Forex traders who want to learn Forex?

My guideline is to learn mathematics and/or physics, and start learning how science (true science i.e. observable, replicable, univocal) can help you find a viable expectancy. The information is out there for free in currency terms. But you will have to pay with time and efforts.

So can your mathematics and/or physics be proven with third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy?
Jan 08, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물281
Jan 04, 2018 at 05:27
Dove777 posted:
Croco_Dile posted:

And all of them with very low or even negative returns ! 😑
Lousy !

That is the best results professionals can deliver. You seem to suggest that your own performance is much better. Would you care to share your own verified results to demonstrate your comments are not hollow.

Even with an ordinary robot under YOUR supervision, robot+YOU can deliver MUCH better results than those professionals !
And those robots are available FOR FREE on QLM5 site..... 😎

All my results are verified, dear friend ! 🙄 🙄 You just did not bother to look ! 🙄 🙄
Complexity is expensive, inefficient, and ineffective > Crocodile trading
Sep 01, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물10
Jan 04, 2018 at 11:33
Croco_Dile posted:
Dove777 posted:
Croco_Dile posted:

And all of them with very low or even negative returns ! 😑
Lousy !

That is the best results professionals can deliver. You seem to suggest that your own performance is much better. Would you care to share your own verified results to demonstrate your comments are not hollow.

Even with an ordinary robot under YOUR supervision, robot+YOU can deliver MUCH better results than those professionals !
And those robots are available FOR FREE on QLM5 site..... 😎

All my results are verified, dear friend ! 🙄 🙄 You just did not bother to look ! 🙄 🙄

Talk is cheap. Give me the link to your 6 years of verified results.
로그인 / 가입하기 to comment
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.