Jarratt Davis;s student

FXtrader2010 posted:
those who teach cant do, those who do don't teach[/quote

Thank you for your advice

Dove777 posted:
JD's approach is using fundamentals. He has tons of video out there explaining his approach.

FXtrader2010 posted:
those who teach cant do, those who do don't teach

AniLorak posted:

Dove777 posted:
JD's approach is using fundamentals. He has tons of video out there explaining his approach.

Thank you very much for you info! Is it free or paid service?

Dove777 posted:
Jarrat's track record is verified and ranked by Barclay Hedge, a service that ranks professional fund managers.

And all of them with very low or even negative returns ! 😑
Lousy !

SwapTrader posted:

FXtrader2010 posted:
those who teach cant do, those who do don't teach

Really?

fxphysics posted:
Unless any self-proclaimed 'mentor' out there can show a self-owned, consistent, long-term third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy, then he remains a total fraud in my book.

Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.

How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.

Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.

Dove777 posted:

AniLorak posted:

Dove777 posted:
JD's approach is using fundamentals. He has tons of video out there explaining his approach.

Thank you very much for you info! Is it free or paid service?

There are a couple of sources where you can get access to some free videos to understand JD's approach, his website Jarratt Davis and just do a search in you tube. The core training is a professional traders programme for $1997 which I believe is still offered at $997.
Jarrat's track record is verified and ranked by Barclay Hedge, a service that ranks professional fund managers.

https://imgur.com/7vFnhmY

Croco_Dile posted:

And all of them with very low or even negative returns ! 😑
Lousy !

Adribaasmet posted:

fxphysics posted:
Unless any self-proclaimed 'mentor' out there can show a self-owned, consistent, long-term third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy, then he remains a total fraud in my book.

Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.

How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.

Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.

So, what’s your guideline for the new Forex traders who want to learn Forex?

fxphysics posted:

Adribaasmet posted:

fxphysics posted:
Unless any self-proclaimed 'mentor' out there can show a self-owned, consistent, long-term third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy, then he remains a total fraud in my book.

Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.

How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.

Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.

So, what’s your guideline for the new Forex traders who want to learn Forex?

My guideline is to learn mathematics and/or physics, and start learning how science (true science i.e. observable, replicable, univocal) can help you find a viable expectancy. The information is out there for free in currency terms. But you will have to pay with time and efforts.

Dove777 posted:

Croco_Dile posted:

And all of them with very low or even negative returns ! 😑
Lousy !

That is the best results professionals can deliver. You seem to suggest that your own performance is much better. Would you care to share your own verified results to demonstrate your comments are not hollow.