Do you prefer fixed spreads or dynamic spreads?

Aug 27, 2012 at 07:53
6,485 개의 뷰
127 Replies
Aug 25, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물18
Nov 04, 2016 at 09:12
TiffanyK posted:
I vote for the variable spreads in combination with real market execution. They reflect the true pricing which is always a dynamic dimension. Better also to have the commission charged additionally, not in the spread.

Definitely I read some comparison that compared your average ECN with commission to Forex.com and the ECN was literally half the price
Oct 07, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물12
Nov 08, 2016 at 08:00
All it depends upon the trading strategy. Like for a scalper fixed spreads won’t work as there can be too many requotes and added markups. I personally prefer variable spreads and my broker also offers me pure ECN spreads. Dynamic spreads can be sometimes very tight or even zero during some news events. But fixed spreads remain the same always, so you are not able to take advantage of real market tight spreads.
Oct 01, 2015 부터 멤버   게시물47
Nov 08, 2016 at 12:25
Good point montreal. I agree that it depends on the strategy. Also it is important how you program any EAs that you may use.
Mar 25, 2015 부터 멤버   게시물74
Nov 09, 2016 at 13:49
I vote for the variable spreads. However, sometimes what you see in your terminal is not what you get in your trades...
Oct 07, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물12
Nov 11, 2016 at 09:32
CliveCampbell posted:
Good point montreal. I agree that it depends on the strategy. Also it is important how you program any EAs that you may use.

Thanks Clive. I absolutely agree with you that EAs play an important role. With EA strategy you can play with dynamic spreads as in you can set a spread calculator in your program so that it keeps on calculating the lowest spread (diff b/w bid & ask) and executes the trade when it gets the lowest spread which can be even below the average spread. Also you can set a upper limit for spread that is to not execute trade if spread goes above.
Apr 07, 2015 부터 멤버   게시물55
Nov 13, 2016 at 07:58
One more vote for the floating spreads. It is better if no mark up is added to be in higher control of the pending orders triggering.
Nov 13, 2015 부터 멤버   게시물35
Nov 15, 2016 at 07:21
I am trading FX with dynamic spreads since the very beginning. I guess this is what I am used to. I agree with Carlos about the mark-up in the spread. This is important for the costs and performance.
A knight's tale!
Mar 31, 2015 부터 멤버   게시물45
Nov 15, 2016 at 16:02
When I started trading FX I used fixed spreads because I thought this brings predictability of the costs. Nowadays I trade at dynamic spreads and it's all fine as long as they are stable at market news.
I would add a second question - do you prefer the commission to be separate or included in the spread? 😄
Aug 09, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물14
Nov 17, 2016 at 08:20
Hello, I like dynamic spreads more because in my experience they are generally more advantageous than fixed ones in common traded volume
Dec 17, 2015 부터 멤버   게시물41
Nov 17, 2016 at 15:49
Fixed or dynamic, they need to be stable during market news especially when you scalp.
Need for speed!
Aug 10, 2015 부터 멤버   게시물49
Nov 20, 2016 at 08:11
I kinda associate the fixed spreads with the broker dealing desk and a manipulation of the price. This is a red signal for me to avoid it. Variable spread looks to me as the most realistic option.
Dec 17, 2015 부터 멤버   게시물30
Nov 21, 2016 at 15:19
lee42747 posted:
I kinda associate the fixed spreads with the broker dealing desk and a manipulation of the price. This is a red signal for me to avoid it. Variable spread looks to me as the most realistic option.

Same here Jay! One more vote for the dynamic spreads 😄
Nov 17, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물7
Nov 22, 2016 at 07:38
leopoldo posted:
Fixed or dynamic, they need to be stable during market news especially when you scalp.

'Scalp during news' - I suppose trading should not turn into gambling 😂
Green pips to you all!
Mar 14, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물44
Nov 22, 2016 at 13:58
Dynamic spreads with no commission markup - this is my choice!
Feb 12, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물427
Nov 22, 2016 at 15:17
I think we have all (or most of us) agreed on one thing - that the commission should be charged additionally. Spreads choice should be synchronized with your strategy choice – no doubts.
Regarding scalping during news – this is the easiest way to lose your money 😀
Accept the loss as experience
Aug 25, 2016 부터 멤버   게시물18
Nov 24, 2016 at 06:49
I trade Australian & NZ news all the time with Vantage ... spreads are never that much wider ... there's only so much liquidity in Asia anyway ... I think tight stops are what kills most people when news trading minor events like these
Oct 01, 2015 부터 멤버   게시물47
Nov 24, 2016 at 09:57
JayTeeFX posted:
I trade Australian & NZ news all the time with Vantage ... spreads are never that much wider ... there's only so much liquidity in Asia anyway ... I think tight stops are what kills most people when news trading minor events like these

If you spread is fixed or quite high including the commission, tight stop losses can definitely do what you say. Either you have less room for action or you risk more.
Oct 01, 2015 부터 멤버   게시물47
Nov 24, 2016 at 09:57
JayTeeFX posted:
I trade Australian & NZ news all the time with Vantage ... spreads are never that much wider ... there's only so much liquidity in Asia anyway ... I think tight stops are what kills most people when news trading minor events like these

I think setting trailing stops could be also helpful in such cases, btw.
Apr 17, 2015 부터 멤버   게시물64
Nov 24, 2016 at 13:25
I am used to the variable spreads and it works perfectly fine for me.
Knowledge is king!
Dec 17, 2015 부터 멤버   게시물41
Nov 27, 2016 at 07:46
Glestofirb posted:
leopoldo posted:
Fixed or dynamic, they need to be stable during market news especially when you scalp.

'Scalp during news' - I suppose trading should not turn into gambling 😂

Yeah, ok, that's right 😄
Need for speed!
로그인 / 가입하기 to comment
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.