Edit Your Comment
Do you prefer fixed spreads or dynamic spreads?
Jun 12, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물16
Jun 12, 2016 at 18:43
Jun 12, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물16
execution speed on floating spread is always better rather than using fixed spread, the bad thing with floating spread is dangereous if you use hedging as your strategy because spread can widen during weekend or spike on news releases
nothing is impossible
Mar 28, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물94
Jun 14, 2016 at 08:35
Dec 11, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물1462
herodontcry posted:
execution speed on floating spread is always better rather than using fixed spread, the bad thing with floating spread is dangereous if you use hedging as your strategy because spread can widen during weekend or spike on news releases
To be honest, the spread widening during news events is dangerous even if you're not hedging. It can widen considerably, take your stop and then the pair continues on its merry way in the direction you were expecting.
Sep 21, 2016 at 10:55
Sep 14, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물17
It is suggested to go for variable spreads as the price feeds are direct from LP's. So in fixed spread your broker can be market maker. Also if you are day trader go for variable spread but being a long term trader you can earn with fixed spreads at the time of events or news as spread is larger at that time.😐
Oct 01, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물47
Oct 22, 2016 at 11:13
Dec 11, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물1462
CliveCampbell posted:
it's dangerous for sure to trade with dynamic spreads during news, but there is always a good chance to make a profit
True. On the other hand, it carries considerable risk, and said risk is too much for me, so I avoid trading during that time.
Oct 25, 2016 at 07:26
Feb 12, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물507
trading with fixed spread could save you during big spikes and is a bit better for news trading, but with fixed spread you pay a lot more in the mark up as with dynamic spread. If you accept the risks of the market and the dynamic srpeads you are paying less for your trading volume. Paying 1.5 Pip fixed Spread for 1 lot is more expensive than lets say paying 8 EUR Commission with dynamic 0.2 Pips spread . The difference is 5 EUR for each 1 lot traded.
Mar 14, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물36
Oct 25, 2016 at 08:50
Mar 14, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물36
It all depends on strategy, but I usually stay away from fixed spreads, because sometimes, brokers are having mark up on the fixed spreads. But some EA's are better working with fixed spreads, so like I explain before it all depends on the type of strategy that you are using.
Sep 15, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물24
Oct 27, 2016 at 12:51
Sep 15, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물24
In my view, variable spreads are better than fixed spreads. The reason being is the trading cost. For example, normally in case of variable spread, a commission (like around $4 per $100k) is charged to you and the average spread tends to remain around 0.3 or 0.5 pips so the total trading cost tends to remain below 1 pip (while it also depends on broker to broker, if you are going for ECN or STP account and what commission they are charging). While, in case of fixed spread, in normal market conditions the trading cost remains generally higher at 2 pips. If you go for variable spreads, during the time of high volumes, it can go to 0.0 pips as well for EURUSD or GBPUSD, in that case your variable cost goes even further down but it does not happen in fixed spread thus leading to higher trading cost. Also, fixed spreads don’t remain the fixed always, at the time of news, even fixed spreads get widen, you will see your spread fixed at say 2 pip only however if you try to buy or sell, you will see a different execution price from what you are seeing.
Oct 08, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물35
Nov 02, 2016 at 07:34
Oct 08, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물35
olivia_jones posted:
In my view, variable spreads are better than fixed spreads. The reason being is the trading cost. For example, normally in case of variable spread, a commission (like around $4 per $100k) is charged to you and the average spread tends to remain around 0.3 or 0.5 pips so the total trading cost tends to remain below 1 pip (while it also depends on broker to broker, if you are going for ECN or STP account and what commission they are charging). While, in case of fixed spread, in normal market conditions the trading cost remains generally higher at 2 pips. If you go for variable spreads, during the time of high volumes, it can go to 0.0 pips as well for EURUSD or GBPUSD, in that case your variable cost goes even further down but it does not happen in fixed spread thus leading to higher trading cost. Also, fixed spreads don’t remain the fixed always, at the time of news, even fixed spreads get widen, you will see your spread fixed at say 2 pip only however if you try to buy or sell, you will see a different execution price from what you are seeing.
I also agree that fixed spread can be more costly over long term!
Trading is like football - if you don't practice you can't win the game!
Oct 08, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물35
Nov 02, 2016 at 07:34
Oct 08, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물35
I prefer the floating spreads but also to have the commission separate and shown in full when I open the trade. This gives me a clear picture of the costs involved and how much should I earn at least to be on profit.
Trading is like football - if you don't practice you can't win the game!
Oct 01, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물47
Nov 03, 2016 at 07:20
Oct 01, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물47
BaldoN posted:
trading with fixed spread could save you during big spikes and is a bit better for news trading, but with fixed spread you pay a lot more in the mark up as with dynamic spread. If you accept the risks of the market and the dynamic srpeads you are paying less for your trading volume. Paying 1.5 Pip fixed Spread for 1 lot is more expensive than lets say paying 8 EUR Commission with dynamic 0.2 Pips spread . The difference is 5 EUR for each 1 lot traded.
Very good point and great explanation. Thanks for this
Oct 01, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물47

*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.