Fluid Trader Account 1 토론

Yury48 posted:

saaedb posted:
If the vendor is putting in extra time to build something for you, I think it's normal to expect some compensation for it.

Normal salespeople such updates are usually released for free.
In addition, this EA will sooner or later lead to a loss of deposit.

If the EA is going to lead to a loss and you might be right, but on the flop side, why do you care for additional pairs or even bother to use the EA?

Clearly you see some value in this EA and you want to take on the risk. Generally an update or bug fixes in a software should be free of charge, but adding scope to the code base in my view is okay to expect some compensation for it.

Personally I won't be purchasing the new version to get extra pairs, I think the two pairs is good enough and risky enough for me as it is.

When will the additional pairs be added to the EA and what will the cost be for existing clients?

It was added a few days ago, details in members area at bottom. Did you not get the email? If so please email support@fluidtrader.com to make sure you on the update email list.

There is big drawdown on AUDUSD!

to fluidtrader:
Do you have a monitoring of new version EA Fluid Trader?
Best regards,
Yury.

happytraderww posted:
If you suspect that the EA is not working, which happened to me once before, I removed the EA, reloaded it and it came back to life.

1. This is VERY CONCERNING! I expect a 'fully automated' EA to work without any manual intervention - that includes reloading EA to charts. Is the vendor aware of any such issues? Can the vendor explain the reason for this occurring?

2. What risk setting is used on 'Fluid Trader Account 1'? Please include risk setting in account description (General tab).

3. Vendor, please explain what occurred on 24-27 November with USDCHF: seems EA suffered some considerable losses. What processes did the EA follow? Was this manual intervention?

This system is not for the faint hearted.... significant draw downs for relatively small gains. Maybe my broker isn’t good for this system.

saaedb posted:
This system is not for the faint hearted.... significant draw downs for relatively small gains. Maybe my broker isn’t good for this system.

I feel the same way with FXChoice, Was in DD on both pairs and hit SL from EA out for a $2,200 loss, then I removed the EA from both pairs and then AUD came back and system still TP for $500 even though I removed the EA. The EA has big DD's for very little profit if it turns around. Have it on LowRisk now, not sure if its a keeper with FXChoice.

Vendor responses via PM:

Need a broker that accepts US clients that would work with this EA? IC Markets does not accept US and same with EA's broker.

Been using CapitalCityMarkets.com with Fluid Trader and functioning fine there, and they accept US clients with favorable conditions, and no standard US restrictions.

A spin off of when Tallinex stopped accepting US Clients.

johnpyster posted:
Need a broker that accepts US clients that would work with this EA? IC Markets does not accept US and same with EA's broker.

you can use FXchoice and Trader'sway, both accept US clients. I have another broker that I use for long; Finpto trading.

Very big drawdown for a pair USDCHF. Autotrading is off.

Yury48 posted:
Very big drawdown for a pair USDCHF. Autotrading is off.

Very Big is not a number... if you can give a percent number for what the drawdown is that would be a lot more helpful.

In my experience, expect a 35-40% drawdown with medium risk to gain 2-3% profit.

26.2 % drawdown on my end, on live account ... We'll see how it gets resolve :-)

cojub posted:
26.2 % drawdown on my end, on live account ... We'll see how it gets resolve :-)

I've had mine go for a single currency around 30% negative and recover, I've also taken a loss of 35% and recover (recovery took a month). Personally I've stopped using the EA on a live account, the risk to reward wasn't acceptable to me.

The drawdown that you see on the authors signal is not true representation(his signal doesn't refresh on a regular basis).

Yes, I also removed this EA from the real account.