Fluid Trader Account 1 (由 fluidtrader)
收益 : | -99.9% |
缩减 | 70.95% |
点: | -12326.5 |
交易 | 12109 |
赢得: |
|
损失:。 |
|
类型: | 真实 |
杠杆率: | 1:30 |
交易: | 自动的 |
Edit Your Comment
Fluid Trader Account 1讨论
Dec 01, 2017 at 15:36
会员从Sep 10, 2014开始
135帖子
Yury48 posted:saaedb posted:
If the vendor is putting in extra time to build something for you, I think it's normal to expect some compensation for it.
Normal salespeople such updates are usually released for free.
In addition, this EA will sooner or later lead to a loss of deposit.
If the EA is going to lead to a loss and you might be right, but on the flop side, why do you care for additional pairs or even bother to use the EA?
Clearly you see some value in this EA and you want to take on the risk. Generally an update or bug fixes in a software should be free of charge, but adding scope to the code base in my view is okay to expect some compensation for it.
Personally I won't be purchasing the new version to get extra pairs, I think the two pairs is good enough and risky enough for me as it is.
会员从Mar 09, 2017开始
11帖子
会员从Jul 19, 2017开始
13帖子
Dec 07, 2017 at 07:57
会员从Jul 19, 2017开始
13帖子
It was added a few days ago, details in members area at bottom. Did you not get the email? If so please email support@fluidtrader.com to make sure you on the update email list.
会员从Jan 25, 2010开始
1288帖子
Dec 12, 2017 at 00:39
(已编辑 Dec 12, 2017 at 01:00)
会员从Jan 25, 2010开始
1288帖子
happytraderww posted:
If you suspect that the EA is not working, which happened to me once before, I removed the EA, reloaded it and it came back to life.
1. This is VERY CONCERNING! I expect a "fully automated" EA to work without any manual intervention - that includes reloading EA to charts. Is the vendor aware of any such issues? Can the vendor explain the reason for this occurring?
2. What risk setting is used on "Fluid Trader Account 1"? Please include risk setting in account description (General tab).
3. Vendor, please explain what occurred on 24-27 November with USDCHF: seems EA suffered some considerable losses. What processes did the EA follow? Was this manual intervention?
会员从Mar 09, 2017开始
11帖子
Dec 15, 2017 at 12:19
会员从Mar 09, 2017开始
11帖子
saaedb posted:
This system is not for the faint hearted.... significant draw downs for relatively small gains. Maybe my broker isn’t good for this system.
I feel the same way with FXChoice, Was in DD on both pairs and hit SL from EA out for a $2,200 loss, then I removed the EA from both pairs and then AUD came back and system still TP for $500 even though I removed the EA. The EA has big DD's for very little profit if it turns around. Have it on LowRisk now, not sure if its a keeper with FXChoice.
会员从Mar 09, 2017开始
11帖子
会员从Jan 25, 2010开始
1288帖子
会员从Jan 01, 2015开始
231帖子
Dec 19, 2017 at 01:53
会员从Jan 01, 2015开始
231帖子
johnpyster posted:
Need a broker that accepts US clients that would work with this EA? IC Markets does not accept US and same with EA's broker.
you can use FXchoice and Trader'sway, both accept US clients. I have another broker that I use for long; Finpto trading.
Succeed in Forex trading
Jan 15, 2018 at 14:51
会员从Sep 10, 2014开始
135帖子
Yury48 posted:
Very big drawdown for a pair USDCHF. Autotrading is off.
Very Big is not a number... if you can give a percent number for what the drawdown is that would be a lot more helpful.
In my experience, expect a 35-40% drawdown with medium risk to gain 2-3% profit.
Jan 15, 2018 at 18:33
(已编辑 Jan 15, 2018 at 18:34)
会员从Sep 10, 2014开始
135帖子
cojub posted:
26.2 % drawdown on my end, on live account ... We'll see how it gets resolve :-)
I've had mine go for a single currency around 30% negative and recover, I've also taken a loss of 35% and recover (recovery took a month). Personally I've stopped using the EA on a live account, the risk to reward wasn't acceptable to me.
The drawdown that you see on the authors signal is not true representation(his signal doesn't refresh on a regular basis).
会员从Jan 18, 2017开始
1帖子

*商业用途和垃圾邮件将不被容忍,并可能导致账户终止。
提示:发布图片/YouTube网址会自动嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:键入@符号,自动完成参与此讨论的用户名。