Advertisement
Forex Growth Bot
| : 게인 | +2644.71% |
| 드로다운 | 94.46% |
| 핍스: | 8075.5 |
| 거래 | 2881 |
| 원 : |
|
| 손실: |
|
| : 종류 | 리얼 |
| 레버리지: | 1:200 |
| 거래 : | 자동화 |
Forex Growth Bot 토론
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1410
Mar 30, 2011 at 07:19
I've just installed the new version and it's completely screwed up the validation of all the other EA's I'm using on accounts.
Is anyone else experiencing this problem?
The update has fundamentally made my entire VPS unusable now with commercial EA's.
Is anyone else experiencing this problem?
The update has fundamentally made my entire VPS unusable now with commercial EA's.
Mar 30, 2011 at 07:40
I have installed it as well , but no problems with validation of my other EAs or VPS.
stevetrade posted:
I've just installed the new version and it's completely screwed up the validation of all the other EA's I'm using on accounts.
Is anyone else experiencing this problem?
The update has fundamentally made my entire VPS unusable now with commercial EA's.
Mar 30, 2011 at 07:48
Hi Steve,
Which EAs is this messing the validation with?
I only installed the new update on 1 MT4 running 1 account because I saw the new licensing only allowed 1 account to be used at a time. On that same account and MT4 I have MD, pip laser, shark and sigma running and there is nothing in the journal or experts tab to show that anything is wrong. MD and laser use clickbank's validation and shark and sigma were bought on plimus.
Which EAs is this messing the validation with?
I only installed the new update on 1 MT4 running 1 account because I saw the new licensing only allowed 1 account to be used at a time. On that same account and MT4 I have MD, pip laser, shark and sigma running and there is nothing in the journal or experts tab to show that anything is wrong. MD and laser use clickbank's validation and shark and sigma were bought on plimus.
Mar 30, 2011 at 10:05
(편집됨 Mar 30, 2011 at 10:11)
i was disgruntled about the new license design which limits to 1 MT4 account, at a time. I did not sign up for this while I bought this EA.
- As a user, impact would be impossible continue to put the EA into multiple demo accounts for testing purposes. Not to mention several real accounts.
correct me, if I am wrong.
- As a user, impact would be impossible continue to put the EA into multiple demo accounts for testing purposes. Not to mention several real accounts.
correct me, if I am wrong.
Mar 30, 2011 at 10:28
My question has to do with the different default settings for the EA and the indicator. The EA uses
FastVolatilityBase = 5;
SlowVolatilityBase = 60;
VolatilityFactor = 2.0;
But the indicator uses
FastVolatilityBase = 3;
SlowVolatilityBase = 50;
VolatilityFactor = 1.5;
Which are the best settings for the EU on M15 and why are they not the same by default?
FastVolatilityBase = 5;
SlowVolatilityBase = 60;
VolatilityFactor = 2.0;
But the indicator uses
FastVolatilityBase = 3;
SlowVolatilityBase = 50;
VolatilityFactor = 1.5;
Which are the best settings for the EU on M15 and why are they not the same by default?
Oct 30, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물57
Mar 30, 2011 at 11:52
ranesh posted:
Think of Toyota releasing a new model.. lets say a Corolla to the market. A few months or perhaps a year later... it releases a newer version of the Corolla. You still have to pay for the newer one if you want it. They are not going to simply exchange the previous model that you own and give you the new one for free.
Sometimes the variation in the models is minor... maybe newly designed lights and a few extra features in the cabin or something like that. Either way, an existing owner of the previous model doesn't get the new model for free in exchange for what he currently owns.
The basic difference being that the new model, purchased or not, does not affect the previous owners in any manner, what-so-ever. They still get the same service, usage, warranty, etc. that was in the agreement at the time of purchase. Neither Toyota or anyone else has the right (legally, at least) to change the contract without the approval of both parties, as the contract was already agreed to and acted upon.
They cannot ad-hoc tell the old customers that they can carry only one passenger!! Or drive only 20 miles a day!! The changes made in the agreement of the EA are similar to these ridiculous demands.
In the event that there was something wrong with the previous car, Toyota is obligated to repair / upgrade the model at no cost to the previous owner, and provide continuing service as originally agreed.
Mar 30, 2011 at 12:00
MoneyFountain1 posted:
ranesh posted:
Think of Toyota releasing a new model.. lets say a Corolla to the market. A few months or perhaps a year later... it releases a newer version of the Corolla. You still have to pay for the newer one if you want it. They are not going to simply exchange the previous model that you own and give you the new one for free.
Sometimes the variation in the models is minor... maybe newly designed lights and a few extra features in the cabin or something like that. Either way, an existing owner of the previous model doesn't get the new model for free in exchange for what he currently owns.
The basic difference being that the new model, purchased or not, does not affect the previous owners in any manner, what-so-ever. They still get the same service, usage, warranty, etc. that was in the agreement at the time of purchase. Neither Toyota or anyone else has the right (legally, at least) to change the contract without the approval of both parties, as the contract was already agreed to and acted upon.
They cannot ad-hoc tell the old customers that they can carry only one passenger!! Or drive only 20 miles a day!! The changes made in the agreement of the EA are similar to these ridiculous demands.
In the event that there was something wrong with the previous car, Toyota is obligated to repair / upgrade the model at no cost to the previous owner, and provide continuing service as originally agreed.
Exactly ... 😂
Mar 30, 2011 at 13:49
FGR, I agree with some of the comments here. We made the purchase of the bot base on the agreement term that there would be able to use the EA on mutilple accounts without additional charges (at least thats the reason I brought it). I think alot of us does understand that it requires resources to make updates and fix bugs but the additional charges should come from the new buyers and not from customers who already support your product from the get-go.
forex_trader_18284
Sep 13, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물37
Mar 30, 2011 at 13:56
fxgrowthbot posted:
Hi RTSE,
Yes, perhaps not all , but MANY of you and others not here , hammered us to come out with an update as fast as possible. We were not able to finish all the changes we intended, which we are working on now, but we plan to provide a solution for multiple demo testing for FREE with no additional license costs, and doing 1 live account per license.
You can change your live account at anytime. And transfer the license seamlessly.
I'm sorry that some of you are agitated. And I appreciate some of you defending our position. But we have NO intention of screwing anyone over.. like said this is $84.99 not $1,000. We priced it low so people CAN actually afford it. And no we won't turn around and force you to pay a monthly fee down the road.
This is a one time fee per license and we will NOT be changing that for the robot itself.
fxgrowthbot, I think that you may have misinterpreted my comment. I probably didn’t state my thoughts as clearly as I should have. First off, I don’t really have a big issue with the new licensing arrangement. I’ve already purchased multiple licenses from you, so I’m good there. Also, I do appreciate that you’re making improvements to the EA and that you intend to allow multiple demo accounts. That’s all great stuff. The question I have is just to help clarify how the licensing really works for a single account.
What I would like to know is if the licensing is:
1) 1 license on 1 account
OR
2) 1 license on 1 account on 1 machine
If the licensing is per #1 above, then I'm doing something wrong with my setup and I need to figure that out. If the licensing is per #2 above, that’s fine, I don’t have a problem with it but I just want to understand which scenario is correct. I typically run my live account on a VPS and then I run a separate copy of the same live account on my home computer where I do my backtesting. I don’t like to backtest on the VPS for obvious reasons. If the licensing is #2 above, I’ll just have to install a demo account and run the backtesting that way. No big deal, just trying to completely understand the current licensing structure. Thanks.
Dec 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물107
Mar 30, 2011 at 14:38
Hi Everyone..
We have put some thought into what you all are saying. And I 'm going to see if we can make some compromises. I will see what we can do.. we can't do infinite, but I will see if we can perhaps give out more accounts per license or unlimited demo or something of that nature.
If it says verifying .. please check journal tab and expert tab for errors. Make sure you did activate properly.. and check status.
We have put some thought into what you all are saying. And I 'm going to see if we can make some compromises. I will see what we can do.. we can't do infinite, but I will see if we can perhaps give out more accounts per license or unlimited demo or something of that nature.
If it says verifying .. please check journal tab and expert tab for errors. Make sure you did activate properly.. and check status.
Mar 30, 2011 at 15:44
fxgrowthbot posted:
Hi Everyone..
We have put some thought into what you all are saying. And I 'm going to see if we can make some compromises. I will see what we can do.. we can't do infinite, but I will see if we can perhaps give out more accounts per license or unlimited demo or something of that nature.
If it says verifying .. please check journal tab and expert tab for errors. Make sure you did activate properly.. and check status.
That would be great .... as far as verifying, journal says growth bot loaded successfully, no errors. still says verifying and will take no trades. I think there was one this morning that was missed.
Dec 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물107
Mar 30, 2011 at 16:16
Please try click check status in license manager and make sure it's the right mt4 account number put in.. etc. and restart mt4.. try redoing it if you can.
Passed this to programmer to see if we can solve it, but most likely ,needs restart ,or info need s to be entered again with no spaces and such.
Passed this to programmer to see if we can solve it, but most likely ,needs restart ,or info need s to be entered again with no spaces and such.
Oct 30, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물57
Mar 30, 2011 at 16:52
fxgrowthbot posted:
Hi Everyone..
We have put some thought into what you all are saying. And I 'm going to see if we can make some compromises. I will see what we can do.. we can't do infinite, but I will see if we can perhaps give out more accounts per license or unlimited demo or something of that nature.
If it says verifying .. please check journal tab and expert tab for errors. Make sure you did activate properly.. and check status.
:) Thanks
forex_trader_18284
Sep 13, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물37
Mar 30, 2011 at 17:04
tradertom posted:
my update looks like its running fine. Strange trade 30 mins ago. Went long EU at the top of the spike and closed 15 mins later! small loss but none the less strange trade. settings at default except lot size. anyone else get this?
tradertom, I didn't get that trade with MBT or ATC.
Dec 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물107
Mar 30, 2011 at 17:13
Are you sure it was growth bot? If it was might have to do with broker data. We had 1 trade today though.
forex_trader_18284
Sep 13, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물37
Mar 30, 2011 at 17:19
I noticed that this mornings trade didn't close out correctly on ATC. Seems like the FGB EA is still losing track of trades that go to SL on ATC.
