QuantStrategyEA
: 게인 | +42.31% |
드로다운 | 50.37% |
핍스: | 137.4 |
거래 | 206 |
원 : |
|
손실: |
|
: 종류 | 리얼 |
레버리지: | 1:500 |
거래 : | 자동화 |
Edit Your Comment
QuantStrategyEA 토론
Aug 07, 2013 at 20:25
Aug 07, 2013 부터 멤버
게시물23
Cant possibly remain profitable into the future. His losses are 2x his wins. So, he needs to win 2 trades for every one trade he loses just to break even. So his break even point is 66% wins and thats not including commissions and slippage. At best, his system should be showing only a small profit. The figures dont add up.
forex_trader_29148
Feb 11, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1916
Sep 16, 2013 at 20:38
(편집됨 Sep 16, 2013 at 20:38)
Feb 11, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1916
conorp posted:aaaaagree with that
Cant possibly remain profitable into the future. His losses are 2x his wins. So, he needs to win 2 trades for every one trade he loses just to break even. So his break even point is 66% wins and thats not including commissions and slippage. At best, his system should be showing only a small profit. The figures dont add up.
Feb 06, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물1
Oct 03, 2013 at 07:20
Feb 06, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물1
losses vs wins are not the only criterion of profitability, because system has SL bigger than PT it also has bigger win probability, over 66%.
The EA works in a backtest, it works in over a year of live trading, I don't worry that it will work also in the future.
The EA works in a backtest, it works in over a year of live trading, I don't worry that it will work also in the future.
Apr 13, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물1
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.