Advertisement
QuantStrategyEA
| : 게인 | +42.31% |
| 드로다운 | 50.37% |
| 핍스: | 137.4 |
| 거래 | 206 |
| 원 : |
|
| 손실: |
|
| : 종류 | 리얼 |
| 레버리지: | 1:500 |
| 거래 : | 자동화 |
QuantStrategyEA 토론
Feb 28, 2013 at 06:58
1,264 개의 뷰
6 Replies
Aug 07, 2013 at 20:25
Cant possibly remain profitable into the future. His losses are 2x his wins. So, he needs to win 2 trades for every one trade he loses just to break even. So his break even point is 66% wins and thats not including commissions and slippage. At best, his system should be showing only a small profit. The figures dont add up.
forex_trader_29148
Feb 11, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1768
Sep 16, 2013 at 20:38
(편집됨 Sep 16, 2013 at 20:38)
conorp posted:aaaaagree with that
Cant possibly remain profitable into the future. His losses are 2x his wins. So, he needs to win 2 trades for every one trade he loses just to break even. So his break even point is 66% wins and thats not including commissions and slippage. At best, his system should be showing only a small profit. The figures dont add up.
Feb 06, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물1
Oct 03, 2013 at 07:20
losses vs wins are not the only criterion of profitability, because system has SL bigger than PT it also has bigger win probability, over 66%.
The EA works in a backtest, it works in over a year of live trading, I don't worry that it will work also in the future.
The EA works in a backtest, it works in over a year of live trading, I don't worry that it will work also in the future.
Apr 13, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물1
Oct 17, 2013 at 07:48
hello your good system
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.
