QuantStrategyEA
收益 : | +42.31% |
缩减 | 50.37% |
点: | 137.4 |
交易 | 206 |
赢得: |
|
损失:。 |
|
类型: | 真实 |
杠杆率: | 1:500 |
交易: | 自动的 |
Edit Your Comment
QuantStrategyEA讨论
Aug 07, 2013 at 20:25
会员从Aug 07, 2013开始
23帖子
Cant possibly remain profitable into the future. His losses are 2x his wins. So, he needs to win 2 trades for every one trade he loses just to break even. So his break even point is 66% wins and thats not including commissions and slippage. At best, his system should be showing only a small profit. The figures dont add up.

forex_trader_29148
会员从Feb 11, 2011开始
1768帖子
Sep 16, 2013 at 20:38
(已编辑 Sep 16, 2013 at 20:38)
会员从Feb 11, 2011开始
1768帖子
conorp posted:aaaaagree with that
Cant possibly remain profitable into the future. His losses are 2x his wins. So, he needs to win 2 trades for every one trade he loses just to break even. So his break even point is 66% wins and thats not including commissions and slippage. At best, his system should be showing only a small profit. The figures dont add up.
会员从Feb 06, 2012开始
1帖子
Oct 03, 2013 at 07:20
会员从Feb 06, 2012开始
1帖子
losses vs wins are not the only criterion of profitability, because system has SL bigger than PT it also has bigger win probability, over 66%.
The EA works in a backtest, it works in over a year of live trading, I don't worry that it will work also in the future.
The EA works in a backtest, it works in over a year of live trading, I don't worry that it will work also in the future.
会员从Apr 13, 2012开始
1帖子

*商业用途和垃圾邮件将不被容忍,并可能导致账户终止。
提示:发布图片/YouTube网址会自动嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:键入@符号,自动完成参与此讨论的用户名。