로드 중...
Myfxbook.com에 계속 접속하세요
Myfxbook.com에 계속 접속하세요
Čeština
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Indonesia
Latviešu
Melayu
Polski
Português(Brasil)
Português(Portugal)
Slovenčina
Svenska
Türkçe
Vietnamese
Русский
हिंदी
ไทย
日本語
简体字
繁體中文
한국어
로그인
가입하기
Open an account with FOREX.com
FX Tools:
경제 달력
Interest Rates
FX Calculators
뉴스
스프레드
감정
외환 히트 맵
상관 관계
Market Hours
홈
mach26
게시물
공유하기
이 페이지를 공유하세요!
Advertisement
mach26
에 의한 게시물
Gladiator Capital - Maximus
트레이딩 시스템
에서
Jan 20, 2015 at 13:33
Dear Colleagues, The unfortunate events following the Swiss intervention caused my Broker (Alpari) to enter administration and cease trading. While my own funds are intact and our risk software prevented any trading in the Swissie on 15th Jan, the account has needed to be closed and therefore we will need to start again using a fresh Broker and account. Sorry for any inconvenience
Caesar@IcMarkets
트레이딩 시스템
에서
Oct 13, 2014 at 16:59
Thanks for this. The issue is that in order to back test both working together then I need the original EA so that I can change parameters in both. It's not a difficult EA in what it does so it maybe possible to reproduce something similar. Its trying to work out the entry parameters. There's an EA called Pipstrider that does something similar but it would take me two or three weeks to recreate then optimise this EA to vaguely "copy" Caesar. We might try writing one from scratch since it just needs moderating during times of high volatility. We achieve this by switching off t...
Caesar@IcMarkets
트레이딩 시스템
에서
Oct 13, 2014 at 07:04
Hi Cyberryder, yes, good point. Pressure of our own EA work makes this difficult at the moment but I will certainly set something up in a few weeks
Caesar@IcMarkets
트레이딩 시스템
에서
Oct 12, 2014 at 17:26
Hi, I am always interested in systems with good consistent equity growth and a low DD. They're hard to find. The main problem is that the Providers and Subscribers all have a focus on reward not risk. Caesar's system did not display the SL's and therefore it's not possible to have a proper risk/reward profile. At no time did any of his subscribers have any idea what they could lose but there was a good history of equity growth. His EA appeared to work for some while with a very poor risk reward. I know I keep going on about it but if you use a hedging EA then that no longer bec...
Caesar@IcMarkets
트레이딩 시스템
에서
Oct 08, 2014 at 05:51
I heard yesterday that of the trillions traded each day, some $80billion is as a result of Retail traders like us. It would be far more upsetting if it turned out that it wasn't chance.........
Caesar@IcMarkets
트레이딩 시스템
에서
Oct 07, 2014 at 18:39
Well, good luck with the latest 27 odd trades in severe draw-down. With the dollar weakening while Traders wait for the FOMC minutes tomorrow, I fear a repercussion of the NFP event of Friday only on a worse scale. I still believe that there's some merit in reducing the lot size of the primary trade and hedging at twice the original size at 10pips draw down. This way you have the potential to win both the primary trades and hedge. With a trailing hedge of 15 pips, the original trades would have closed in net profit. I didn't back test this but perhaps someone can?
Caesar@IcMarkets
트레이딩 시스템
에서
Oct 04, 2014 at 09:52
Yes, the horse definitely bolted ( as above) but now we have to get the horse back and make sure it stays in its stable! Several people have mentioned Hedging. I have a very nice system (Hedge EA) from EA -Coder which works very well with systems like this one. My earlier observation was that in most trading sequences, Caesar's system will take several trades before price reverses. There are few sequences that go immediately in favour of the the trade. It begs the question; I wonder what would happen if he reversed the EA? In the event that he doesn't, then using a Hedge EA like the on...
Caesar@IcMarkets
트레이딩 시스템
에서
Oct 03, 2014 at 17:29
I've been watching this system for a couple of months. In my view, in order to pay for the subscription, you have to have a £10K account to be able to trade the lot sizes necessary to make a sensible net profit after costs. The system appears to buy at the top and sell at the bottom, which is sort of interesting although this is clearly a subjective observation but it frequently opens multiple positions as a result. This leads to a risk:reward ratio which is considerably worse than 1:1 so the risk of ruin is large unless you have a substantial account. This was demonstrated when the ...
You have an Ad Blocker!
Myfxbook is a site supported by advertisements. Here are two ways for you to continue browsing:
Ad Free Subscription
또는
Disable your Ad Blocker
Already subscribed?
로그인
로그인하지 않은 경우
이 기능은 등록된 회원만 사용할 수 있습니다.
등록은 무료이며 1 분 미만이 소요됩니다.
계속 진행하려면 가입 버튼을 클릭합니다.
이미 회원이면서 서비스를 즐기지 않는 한 로그인만 하면 됩니다.
Keep up to date with the markets
Enable notifications to receive real-time important market updates:
경제 달력
외환 뉴스
You can disable notifications at any time from your browser.
Unblock Notifications
You've blocked browser notifications for Myfxbook.com. Please enable it:
You can disable notifications at any time from your browser.
이전
합의
실제
