Million Dollar Pips (By milliondpips)
| Прибыль : | +26241.17% |
| Просадка | 39.44% |
| Пипс: | 5202.2 |
| Сделки | 4497 |
| Выигрыш: |
|
| Потери: |
|
| Тип: | Демо |
| Кредитное плечо: | 1:200 |
| Трейдинг: | Автоматически |
Million Dollar Pips Обсуждение
forex_trader_27164
Участник с Jan 16, 2011
69 комментариев
Sep 14, 2011 at 17:42
ForexPro posted:
rootkit posted:
pepperstone is now migrating their servers to NYC because current Australian servers suck, it may take 3 weeks to finish migration.mcymcy posted:
Has anyone have a pepperstone -razor account? This week all losses for me. And the ping times fly over. I think this is last week with razor for me. Their ECN seems to be fraud. There's no 4000ms time for modification of an order in ECN trading conditions.
GOs servers sucking as well.. 66000 ms for a order modify got reported today from a guy and platform flipping around between the DCs...
There are so many brokers out there much more better for MDP personally feel.
Участник с Dec 15, 2010
795 комментариев
Sep 14, 2011 at 18:22
Id never go above 2% and I run a standard risk of 1.5%, remember the first few trades normaly dont win.. dont push the trades unless you have great trades liike the demo page. Slow and steady wins the race. My charts are set at 1.5% risk and growing well.
Garry
Garry
hagenuk posted:
bmurat posted:
what can i do, in my chart standing ' free margin is too low: Channel is off '
can you help me, must i change settings in Input ???
Reduce your risk and channel and SO setting.
Click on my Name to see My Live Charts and Bio.
Участник с Sep 03, 2011
23 комментариев
Sep 14, 2011 at 18:33
i have reduce the the risk of 0.5 and channel, but the ea dont make reaktion is the same problem 'free margin is too low: Channel is off '
Участник с Aug 03, 2011
40 комментариев
Sep 14, 2011 at 18:38
I still stay with 1.16 after I have backtested 1.2
I use eurusd 1.16 since beginning of august and also usdjpy 1.16 since beginning of september.
Here are my results with 7% Risk:
I use eurusd 1.16 since beginning of august and also usdjpy 1.16 since beginning of september.
Here are my results with 7% Risk:
Участник с Jun 15, 2011
270 комментариев
Sep 14, 2011 at 19:29
moneytalks posted:
I still stay with 1.16 after I have backtested 1.2
I use eurusd 1.16 since beginning of august and also usdjpy 1.16 since beginning of september.
Here are my results with 7% Risk:
I can not imagine a real big account with %7 risk setting!!! In consecutive of 7-8 loss trades the account blow up...
Be carefull. Forex is not a game...
Участник с Sep 14, 2011
140 комментариев
Sep 14, 2011 at 19:33
corporatemonkey posted:
I got punished with thinkforex, losses outweighed gains, 14 trades taken... Processing time is increasing.. And by the looks of the other posts I'm not the only one.. More and more people are using this bot which is overloading the brokers servers.. Need to setup a private dedicated processing server somehow...
The same happened to me at pepperstone, exec time jumped from 600 to over 6,000 ms, I switched it off waiting until servers migration to NY is completed
Участник с Sep 14, 2011
140 комментариев
Sep 14, 2011 at 19:33
I started real account with MDP on Sep 5, 2011, achieved 62% gain with 2.5% risk
Участник с Sep 14, 2011
140 комментариев
Sep 14, 2011 at 19:39
milliondpips posted:
It's more than 0s.. with recommended brokers it performs very well
NOT TRUE. I've got real money account at Pepperstone and since a week the exec time has jumped to 6,800 ms (should be < 1000 ms) - this would dangerous to trade, I switched it off
Участник с Aug 16, 2010
453 комментариев
Sep 14, 2011 at 19:40
I think they profile us by the quantity of trades opened around same time and slowed accounts down to protect their servers and their pockets as they scammers are clearly on the other side.
Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker.
Участник с Jun 15, 2011
270 комментариев
Sep 14, 2011 at 19:42
lobotomy8 posted:
corporatemonkey posted:
I got punished with thinkforex, losses outweighed gains, 14 trades taken... Processing time is increasing.. And by the looks of the other posts I'm not the only one.. More and more people are using this bot which is overloading the brokers servers.. Need to setup a private dedicated processing server somehow...
The same happened to me at pepperstone, exec time jumped from 600 to over 6,000 ms, I switched it off waiting until servers migration to NY is completed
Same, i stopped it today and waiting. I start to get bored for carriying the money and try too many brookers. The biggest winner is MoneyBookers...
Участник с Jul 06, 2011
80 комментариев
Sep 15, 2011 at 01:13
moneytalks posted:Hi moneytalks,
I still stay with 1.16 after I have backtested 1.2
I use eurusd 1.16 since beginning of august and also usdjpy 1.16 since beginning of september.
Here are my results with 7% Risk:
Did you change any of the settings on either EA? Thanks
Участник с Aug 03, 2011
40 комментариев
Sep 15, 2011 at 06:44
(отредактировано Sep 15, 2011 at 06:46)
Yes, I had to change the settings on both of them.
The most important was slippage = 0, so it made more profitable trades than on this demo account shown here.
But it do neither use Razor nor Thinkforex for trading.
Started with 125,- Euros at 4th august and now I am at 3491.23 and have already withdrawn 450,- ;-)
The most important was slippage = 0, so it made more profitable trades than on this demo account shown here.
But it do neither use Razor nor Thinkforex for trading.
Started with 125,- Euros at 4th august and now I am at 3491.23 and have already withdrawn 450,- ;-)
Участник с Jan 05, 2011
128 комментариев
Sep 15, 2011 at 07:38
Hi Moneytalks, which broker r u using for the EA ? I have tried Razor from pepperstone and it does a poor job.
Live Freely
Участник с Aug 03, 2011
40 комментариев
Sep 15, 2011 at 07:47
(отредактировано Sep 15, 2011 at 07:51)
Sorry, it was a long search to find the best settings for me and a suitable broker for this EA, therefore I will not tell which broker I am using.
Участник с Mar 04, 2011
286 комментариев
Sep 15, 2011 at 14:42
did any one noticed that in every broker the execution order timing increased as per order?
why so ?
on the same speed on the same vps :$
why so ?
on the same speed on the same vps :$
Press F1 for help or Dial 911.
Участник с Mar 04, 2011
286 комментариев
Sep 15, 2011 at 14:55
what are the results for today ?
proff i want to listen some good words from you.
i got plus at the end total trade 11.
all were shorts
proff i want to listen some good words from you.
i got plus at the end total trade 11.
all were shorts
Press F1 for help or Dial 911.
Участник с Aug 20, 2011
588 комментариев
Sep 15, 2011 at 15:16
for me...
I got 36 trades
for a total of +80.6pips
in 14minutes
I'm using the latest MDP version
compared to the MDP demo: 14 orders, +87.2pips (MDP version?)
I also see another demo account with 34orders and only +36.4pips (MDP version?)
So I'm close to the demo account from a PIPs point of view.
My settings for this batch of trades:
Num Level=2
Channels=8
MaxOrders=8
Risk= 2%
Fifo=false
I also receive a lot of off quotes and invalid price errors.
in live I can see that the EA could close half of these trade for 2 times the final pips. I can see spike to 20pips and finally MDP close it at 10pips.
So now I change the settings to this:
Num level=2
Channels=7
Maxorders=8
Risk=1.5 (less risk, should close orders sooner)
group orders=true (to reduce the stress and the requotes / of quotes errors)
fifo=false
and I'll see the results.
I got 36 trades
for a total of +80.6pips
in 14minutes
I'm using the latest MDP version
compared to the MDP demo: 14 orders, +87.2pips (MDP version?)
I also see another demo account with 34orders and only +36.4pips (MDP version?)
So I'm close to the demo account from a PIPs point of view.
My settings for this batch of trades:
Num Level=2
Channels=8
MaxOrders=8
Risk= 2%
Fifo=false
I also receive a lot of off quotes and invalid price errors.
in live I can see that the EA could close half of these trade for 2 times the final pips. I can see spike to 20pips and finally MDP close it at 10pips.
So now I change the settings to this:
Num level=2
Channels=7
Maxorders=8
Risk=1.5 (less risk, should close orders sooner)
group orders=true (to reduce the stress and the requotes / of quotes errors)
fifo=false
and I'll see the results.
Участник с Mar 04, 2011
286 комментариев
Sep 15, 2011 at 15:25
willgart posted:that mean its better to shift to the latest MDP ver and that is 1.2
for me...
I got 36 trades
for a total of +80.6pips
in 14minutes
I'm using the latest MDP version
compared to the MDP demo: 14 orders, +87.2pips (MDP version?)
I also see another demo account with 34orders and only +36.4pips (MDP version?)
So I'm close to the demo account from a PIPs point of view.
My settings for this batch of trades:
Num Level=2
Channels=8
MaxOrders=8
Risk= 2%
Fifo=false
I also receive a lot of off quotes and invalid price errors.
in live I can see that the EA could close half of these trade for 2 times the final pips. I can see spike to 20pips and finally MDP close it at 10pips.
So now I change the settings to this:
Num level=2
Channels=7
Maxorders=8
Risk=1.5 (less risk, should close orders sooner)
group orders=true (to reduce the stress and the requotes / of quotes errors)
fifo=false
and I'll see the results.
Press F1 for help or Dial 911.
Участник с Sep 03, 2011
23 комментариев
Sep 15, 2011 at 15:39
hi,
i have a problme with MDP.
in my chart standing this information, i need support ;)
!lots:0,10 Actual Risk: 1,63% Risk set at: 1,50% ( at lot Size Minumum: 0,10 : still trading with Actual Risk )
is my MDP right for trading ??? or what is the problem by this information.
i thanks for all helps
i have a problme with MDP.
in my chart standing this information, i need support ;)
!lots:0,10 Actual Risk: 1,63% Risk set at: 1,50% ( at lot Size Minumum: 0,10 : still trading with Actual Risk )
is my MDP right for trading ??? or what is the problem by this information.
i thanks for all helps
Участник с Aug 20, 2011
588 комментариев
Sep 15, 2011 at 15:45
I don't play with the previous version enough to compare this.
MDP should setup 2 demo accounts with both versions to compare this.
Due to issue with my first broker and with my PC at home, MDP was never is good condition to work properly.
So I switch to another broker yesterday... :)
still running from home, but I'll setup a VPs soon
the order processing time (using an EA which test this) is between 300 and 600ms (while my first broker was between 900 and 1100ms.)
But MDP detects an open order at 1100 ms and an average modification time of 450ms during the process of the 34 orders this morning.
So slower to open an order during peak activity compare to the benchmark results.
So grouping orders should resolve these open orders issues.
MDP should setup 2 demo accounts with both versions to compare this.
Due to issue with my first broker and with my PC at home, MDP was never is good condition to work properly.
So I switch to another broker yesterday... :)
still running from home, but I'll setup a VPs soon
the order processing time (using an EA which test this) is between 300 and 600ms (while my first broker was between 900 and 1100ms.)
But MDP detects an open order at 1100 ms and an average modification time of 450ms during the process of the 34 orders this morning.
So slower to open an order during peak activity compare to the benchmark results.
So grouping orders should resolve these open orders issues.
