Forex Growth Bot
收益: | +2644.71% |
縮減 | 94.46% |
點: | 8075.5 |
交易 | 2881 |
贏得: |
|
損失:。 |
|
類型: | 真實 |
杠杆率: | 1:200 |
交易: | 自動的 |
Edit Your Comment
Forex Growth Bot討論
Mar 01, 2012 at 00:19
會員從Mar 25, 2010開始
190帖子
What a naive comment. only about 5 initial trades were 1 lot which was my mistake and even closed in some loss
You should know by now the FGB increases lot sizes. Lot size is set to 0.1, so if a trades of 0.3 or 0.5 , its not a surprise. Every fgb user knows lot size increasing is a common issue with the bot.
I hope you got all the fgb losses today.. lol
Of course I taken all the losses that day (all month actually) as I will take all future earnings, with the same lot size. Lastest version of FGB doesnt double the size of the lot but if you are using a decompiled, older and custom version who knows ;)
Anyway you can stack your money play while looking for investors to gambling with them money.
Green pips 2 you,
Mar 01, 2012 at 07:23
(已編輯Mar 01, 2012 at 07:25)
會員從May 02, 2011開始
47帖子
tapachula posted:
What a naive comment. only about 5 initial trades were 1 lot which was my mistake and even closed in some loss
You should know by now the FGB increases lot sizes. Lot size is set to 0.1, so if a trades of 0.3 or 0.5 , its not a surprise. Every fgb user knows lot size increasing is a common issue with the bot.
I hope you got all the fgb losses today.. lol
Of course I taken all the losses that day (all month actually) as I will take all future earnings, with the same lot size. Lastest version of FGB doesnt double the size of the lot but if you are using a decompiled, older and custom version who knows ;)
Anyway you can stack your money play while looking for investors to gambling with them money.
Green pips 2 you,
Dumb ... I have made it clear in my previous post that I am not here to Sell anything. Besides I have fixed the lot size issue and I will be going live by next week .
IF you are not aware here is the plan, My fgb gets almost all original fgb trades and more. So I will bag all fgb profitable trades and even more and end up being twice or thrice as profitable as Original fgb would be,
Assume my fgb starts taking losses in a worst case scenario and Original fgb wakes up I simply swap them and continue making profits, if in the futrue fgb starts taking losses I swap again and keep making profits, this way I can be more than thrice as profitable, I win on short and Long run. You should understand there is no set and forget. Market behaviour would change and if you must win continously then you must be willin to change with it else stomach periodic consecutive losses...
GOT IT ?..
Cheers
會員從Aug 04, 2011開始
12帖子
會員從Aug 04, 2011開始
12帖子
Mar 01, 2012 at 09:04
會員從Aug 04, 2011開始
12帖子
RalFxify posted:
GianniCascoNero posted:
I had 3 short open trades from yesterday, I can't understand why FGB closed one at +65 pips meanwhile the trend was still down direction 😡
You should clearly see the trend is reversing my friend.. FGB made a wise decision
so better manually close other 2 trades 😐
會員從Oct 28, 2009開始
1409帖子
會員從Feb 12, 2012開始
7帖子
Mar 02, 2012 at 08:04
會員從Feb 23, 2011開始
8帖子
This just does not work this way, they got to find a solution for the members of FGB EA to follow original positions from some source.
Ok, brokers differentiate I understand, but I want to see FGB EA`s original positions from its broker to double check, when it open positions in my broker.
This myfxbook can not track it with a live update, and it is open to everybody. This is not the right way to do it.
Ok, brokers differentiate I understand, but I want to see FGB EA`s original positions from its broker to double check, when it open positions in my broker.
This myfxbook can not track it with a live update, and it is open to everybody. This is not the right way to do it.
會員從Oct 28, 2009開始
1409帖子
Mar 02, 2012 at 09:25
會員從Oct 28, 2009開始
1409帖子
cendolcilik posted:
hi steve, are u make FGB ?, from your statement, if u don't like please leave, what is the meaning, we are here to discuss to make FGB better and better, please sorry if u don't like my statement.. please remove it
Hi, no I didn't make FGB. Wish I had.
All I'm saying is that from time to time FGB will suffer drawdowns, as can be seen from it's trading record, but it always recovers. The problem occurs when the markets get choppy. Predicting when this will happen and working it into an EA is almost impossible. The EA has a ten year backtest history and a solid trading basis to believe the results of that backtest. I'm sure there are tweaks that can be made but overall I think it's average monthly return is phenomenal. You just have to be patient and after several years you will be pretty wealthy.
會員從Jun 18, 2011開始
51帖子
會員從Oct 28, 2009開始
1409帖子
Mar 05, 2012 at 11:15
會員從Oct 28, 2009開始
1409帖子
I can confirm that the trades on here pretty much match the trades I get with the Alpari account I started a few weeks ago.
I would guess the opposite is likely, that people are manually closing their own FGB trades thinking that they know better where the markets are likely to go.
I would guess the opposite is likely, that people are manually closing their own FGB trades thinking that they know better where the markets are likely to go.
Mar 05, 2012 at 11:16
會員從Jul 21, 2010開始
119帖子
SmoothHedge posted:
I haven't seen any other FGB accounts that have been profitable over the last 6 months. Perhaps the FGB team are manually intervening with this account.
Offcourse I believe that, moreover I didn't take last profittable trades because EA was locked in VERIFYING, it's not the first time I have problems like that, this EA is a b****it
會員從Jun 17, 2010開始
24帖子
會員從Jan 14, 2010開始
411帖子
Mar 05, 2012 at 20:56
會員從Jan 14, 2010開始
411帖子
prototipo posted:
SmoothHedge posted:
I haven't seen any other FGB accounts that have been profitable over the last 6 months. Perhaps the FGB team are manually intervening with this account.
Offcourse I believe that, moreover I didn't take last profittable trades because EA was locked in VERIFYING, it's not the first time I have problems like that, this EA is a b****it
agree
Mar 07, 2012 at 12:15
會員從Jun 26, 2011開始
45帖子
Again... losses. This EA always trades in the correct side of the market, but wait too much to take the profits, what allowing them to become it in losses. Once achieve that, the EA take the losses. Look the down trend in the 1 hour chart. Since the 2/29 the price doesn't do other thing that falling. And this EA had made only sales. The EA was right always, but despite it, only collected mostly losses
(I hope my bad English be understand, my language is Spanish)
(I hope my bad English be understand, my language is Spanish)
會員從Aug 04, 2011開始
12帖子
Mar 07, 2012 at 12:18
會員從Aug 04, 2011開始
12帖子
betowm posted:
Again... losses. This EA always trades in the correct side of the market, but wait too much to take the profits, what allowing them to become it in losses. Once achieve that, the EA take the losses. Look the down trend in the 1 hour chart. Since the 2/29 the price doesn't do other thing that falling. And this EA had made only sales. The EA was right always, but despite it, only collected mostly losses
(I hope my bad English be understand, my language is Spanish)
Agree, yesterday was +130pips...and today close in loss 😭
I think FGB have a bad close strategy.
Mar 07, 2012 at 12:30
會員從Mar 08, 2011開始
51帖子
The close strategy is as good as the profits made so far! It's impossible for anyone - software or human - to predict where is the best low/high price for closing a sell/buy order. You all expect FGB to do supra-natural work. Well, just wait... The same strategy produced 1700% gain. If you do not want looses, feel free to manually close any positive trade you are pleased with, but do not come here then to express your frustration about not letting it a little bit more on that positive trade. Same goes for negative P/L. Don't try to bee rich doing nothing but complaining. Do your homework and at least read all the thread. Your complaints have been already discussed before and there're are some resolutions.
Good luck!
Good luck!
Mar 07, 2012 at 13:08
會員從Jun 26, 2011開始
45帖子
pianosso: don't give too much importance to the 1700 % performance. This number hasn't relevance because if you make work the EA with a leverage of 400:1 you might achieve much more than 1700 %. If you design a robot that make only one trade on the whole week, but has an accurate of 99% (win the 99% of the trades and only lost the 1 % of them) you can work with an account by using 400:1 of leverage by making trades of 10 lots and you will achieve this 1700 % but in only one month. This 1700 % means nothing. Believe me.

*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。