正在載入……
繼續訪問Myfxbook.com
繼續訪問Myfxbook.com
Čeština
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Indonesia
Latviešu
Melayu
Polski
Português(Brasil)
Português(Portugal)
Slovenčina
Svenska
Türkçe
Vietnamese
Русский
हिंदी
ไทย
日本語
简体字
繁體中文
한국어
登錄
註冊
Open an account with FOREX.com
FX Tools:
經濟日曆
Interest Rates
FX Calculators
新聞
價差
情緒
外匯熱力圖
相關性
Market Hours
首頁
FXPIG
帖子
分享
分享此頁面！
帖子作者：
FXPIG
1
2
1
2
UC Profit
在
交易系統
中
Jan 20, 2017 at 00:16
Yes, the GP account was lower risk, about 30% it seems.
UC Profit
在
交易系統
中
Jan 20, 2017 at 00:06
No, the account was under 10 pips from a stop out on the Friday close... with an already widened spread. It was the 200+ pip gap that killed the account and sent it into negative territory.
UC Profit
在
交易系統
中
Jan 20, 2017 at 00:02
Obviously, there was a lot of negative pips as there was a stop out, that goes without saying. The thing is other PAMMs traded by Euronis elsewhere and even the other account traded with us did not see these trades. Forex is forex, so most anything that can happen will happen. Hopefully after they find out what happened they will be able to take steps to be sure it does not happen again. We of course will help in any way we can.
UC Profit
在
交易系統
中
Jan 19, 2017 at 23:54
It is an EA, but like all EAs a manager can make changes to parameters or manually intervene as they see fit. It seems that the PAMM that crashed had some issue. Euronis has told us they are looking into it.
UC Profit
在
交易系統
中
Jan 19, 2017 at 23:48
We are aware of the stop out, I was just clarifying that this was a private PAMM traded by the Euronis team, and not the Euronis PAMM listed on the FXPIG MyFXBook Profile Page.
UC Profit
在
交易系統
中
Jan 19, 2017 at 23:46
No. In fact, the Euronis account we have on our MyFXBook profile did not crash, this was another account traded by Euronis. Completely different circumstances and trades.
UC Profit
在
交易系統
中
Jan 19, 2017 at 23:43
The manager held trades and added positions outside the permitted parameters, and before we were able to reach him there was a stop out. Subsequently, he told us that the 13% max risk was per 'day' and that trades held for multiple days could see larger losses. We did not accept this explanation and have since asked him to explain exactly what happened, however, we have only gotten very vague responses. As a result, we have disabled his access to the master account pending a full investigation into what actually did occur.
What would you do
在
一般
中
Dec 16, 2016 at 17:40
Nice to hear Vontogr.Keep it up. As you grow we have another aggregation, based on the SPA, that has some tweaks that can greatly increase the efficiency of higher frequency traders. It was developed in conjunction with a group of clients who needed some very particular order routing configurations based on a slew of different rule sets. FXPIG really is a different kind of broker. And if there is one thing we are knowledgeable in, it is liquidity management.
What would you do
在
一般
中
Dec 14, 2016 at 15:13
Understood... mistakes are sometimes the best teachers.I agree it should have been worded differently. Thank you for your honest feedback, it is appreciated.
What would you do
在
一般
中
Dec 13, 2016 at 19:18
I just wanted to personally comment here...I am ABSOLUTELY embarrassed about that typo. I am a stickler for grammar and hound my guys daily about using the correct verbiage when communicating with our clients.We all make mistakes... and I hope to not repeat that one in the future.On the deadline; we will give enough time for our clients to make a decision. I think 2 to 4 weeks is ample time, and yes, the email could have been worded a bit better, there is no doubt about that.As always, if you want to voice your opinion or simply ask us a question we are here to help.
What would you do
在
一般
中
Dec 13, 2016 at 16:36
Here are links to two different articles on Finance Feeds about the move with some more background information.http://financefeeds.com/breaking-fxpig-moves-new-zealand-vanuatu/http://financefeeds.com/why-fx-brokers-are-leaving-traditional-regulated-regions-and-going-offshore-we-speak-to-fxpig-ceo-kevin-murcko/Look guys... we don't do a THING at FXPIG unless we know it's for the better of the clients and the company.
FTM MAX
在
交易系統
中
Aug 03, 2015 at 07:41
Hello DD,the same goes for this system, it is a managed pamm account run by one of our 3d side managers, and there is no EA for sales.However if you are interested, you may open a managed account thru us ,FXPIG using the link bellow:http://fxpig.com/index-page=open_account.aspx.htmlIf any further query, you may also contact us on
[email protected]
or skype: chat.fxpig Cheers,
MAX PROFIT
在
交易系統
中
Aug 03, 2015 at 07:02
Hello DD,the MAX PROFIT system is a mixed system and is not an EA. It is actually a managed pamm account run by one of our 3d side managers, and there is no EA for sales.However if you are interested, you may open a managed account thru us ,FXPIG using the link bellow:http://fxpig.com/index-page=open_account.aspx.htmlIf any further query, you may also contact us on
[email protected]
or skype: chat.fxpig Cheers,
DOOR ECN
在
交易系統
中
May 15, 2013 at 22:12
No we are still closed to new investments, however the DOOR DMA is open.
DOOR ECN
在
交易系統
中
Nov 14, 2012 at 07:49
We will be launching the cTrader platform with our new web site in < 30 days.As far as the recovery, this is just 'business as usual' for this system. Over all the forward tests we have performed and the live history there is always a DD period which pops up every 6 to 12 weeks on average and the recovery generally lasts under 4 weeks. The trick here is to decrease the amount of DD and increase the speed of the recovery.Cheers,
DOOR ECN
在
交易系統
中
Nov 14, 2012 at 07:14
The account is currently closed as we look to re-position our available liquidity to handle the volumes.Once it is reopened an announcement will be made.Cheers,
DOOR ECN
在
交易系統
中
Jun 13, 2012 at 07:29
Given the dynamics of price action the past 15 to 30 days we have seen some larger than normal open trade draw downs, however this is not the norm. This system has been run for nearly 3 years, the 2011 forward test is visible on our member page, and we have a 2010 forward test available on another stat web site, and in that time we have only seen small pockets of time where open trade DD hits these levels. Closed trade DD has been kept below 25%.All systems have there drawn down periods, but in the end the point is scalability and profitability and this system up till now has proven to be both...
DOOR ECN
在
交易系統
中
Jun 13, 2012 at 07:14
The DOOR system is NOT using Martingale rules for ticket size. Our trade sizes are constant based on the overall size of the account in USD.As our average trade duration is less than 1 hour I am not sure how we can hold onto floating drawdowns 'most of the time'.Cheers,
DOOR ECN
在
交易系統
中
May 13, 2012 at 21:43
Just so we are clear. Is this related to our system?
DOOR ECN
在
交易系統
中
May 13, 2012 at 20:57
That IS possible. You can have 2 trades for example; 1 with 1 lot and 1 with 50 lots. If they 1 lot trade losses 10 pips and the 50 lot trade gains 5, you are net negative in pips and net positive in equity.That being said, this happens a lot with partial fills on large tickets but I do not see such a phenomenon in our trading.We simply had an influx of deposits which offset the gain and absolute gain, not to mention the value per pip.
You have an Ad Blocker!
Myfxbook is a site supported by advertisements. Here are two ways for you to continue browsing:
Ad Free Subscription
或
Disable your Ad Blocker
Already subscribed?
登錄
您沒有登錄
此功能僅適用於註冊會員。
註冊是免費的，只需不到一分鐘。
點擊註冊按鈕繼續。
除非您已經是會員並享受我們的服務，否則只需登錄。
Keep up to date with the markets
Enable notifications to receive real-time important market updates:
經濟日曆
外匯新聞
You can disable notifications at any time from your browser.
Unblock Notifications
You've blocked browser notifications for Myfxbook.com. Please enable it:
You can disable notifications at any time from your browser.
以前
共識
實際
