FxPapa Expert Advisor (による FxPapa)
そのユーザーはこのシステムを削除しました。
Edit Your Comment
FxPapa Expert Advisor 討論
Aug 02, 2012 at 13:56
Oct 15, 2011からメンバー
62 投稿
Alec posted:
phil posted:
Doesn't everyone not set thier own stop loss by percentage of account.
No. The percentage affects the lot size. The stop loss is always around 200 pips (sum of 3 positions).
Yes but you can still control the amount you lose. FXPAPA seems to not have the s/l set as we've seen other times. I believe they do this to provide a nicer looking chart. They have done this in the past. That is why my results are not as good as theirs because my stop hits where theirs doesn't.
Why get rid of the chart?

forex_trader_29148
Feb 11, 2011からメンバー
1768 投稿
Aug 02, 2012 at 15:03
May 24, 2010からメンバー
354 投稿
Close -624 pips. I talked to at the outset that this is bad EA.
25362101 2012.07.25 17:00 sell 0.60 eurusdm 1.21257 0.00000 0.00000 2012.08.02 12:35 1.24002 0.00 0.00 0.30 -164.70 -275
25382480 2012.07.26 10:28 sell 0.60 eurusdm 1.21881 0.00000 0.00000 2012.08.02 12:35 1.24016 0.00 0.00 0.21 -128.10 -214
25388198 2012.07.26 12:08 sell 0.60 eurusdm 1.22662 0.00000 0.00000 2012.08.02 12:35 1.24010 0.00 0.00 0.21 -80.88 -135
http://statements.forexpeacearmy.com/fx_papa_real/statement_new.htm
PS1: The Same Vendor like : http://www.cyber-forex.com
PS2: http://www.myfxbook.com/members/Cyber_Forex/cyber-forex/128885
25362101 2012.07.25 17:00 sell 0.60 eurusdm 1.21257 0.00000 0.00000 2012.08.02 12:35 1.24002 0.00 0.00 0.30 -164.70 -275
25382480 2012.07.26 10:28 sell 0.60 eurusdm 1.21881 0.00000 0.00000 2012.08.02 12:35 1.24016 0.00 0.00 0.21 -128.10 -214
25388198 2012.07.26 12:08 sell 0.60 eurusdm 1.22662 0.00000 0.00000 2012.08.02 12:35 1.24010 0.00 0.00 0.21 -80.88 -135
http://statements.forexpeacearmy.com/fx_papa_real/statement_new.htm
PS1: The Same Vendor like : http://www.cyber-forex.com
PS2: http://www.myfxbook.com/members/Cyber_Forex/cyber-forex/128885
Aug 02, 2012 at 16:10
Sep 23, 2011からメンバー
78 投稿
This is what I thought for some time and now I am sure about FxPapa.
Strategy had no losses so it probably was manipulated. They could add a code in the EA so that when 3 trades were open, the EA would automatically increase the risk until it wins, so that no loss never happened in the strategy. This didn't happen in real account. We saw losses when 3 trades were open and now, FxPapa tried to do what probably was made in Strategy, but didn't work this time because the value didn't come back. If 3 trades are open, you are very close to lose, then you can increase the risk, so that they remain open until you wins or lose everything. If DD increases just a little, no potential buyer will be able to notice that a strategy. But this time, it didn't work. DD was too big and account was hidden so that he can sell a few more copies.
Now that everyone knows that there is a lack of honesty here, my suggestion is:
1. change to other EAs. Forget this person and all his EAs he/she may launch from now on.
2. Go to FPA and write a comment about this. I'm giving 1 star.
In my view there was lack of honesty here, I don't know if you agree.
Strategy had no losses so it probably was manipulated. They could add a code in the EA so that when 3 trades were open, the EA would automatically increase the risk until it wins, so that no loss never happened in the strategy. This didn't happen in real account. We saw losses when 3 trades were open and now, FxPapa tried to do what probably was made in Strategy, but didn't work this time because the value didn't come back. If 3 trades are open, you are very close to lose, then you can increase the risk, so that they remain open until you wins or lose everything. If DD increases just a little, no potential buyer will be able to notice that a strategy. But this time, it didn't work. DD was too big and account was hidden so that he can sell a few more copies.
Now that everyone knows that there is a lack of honesty here, my suggestion is:
1. change to other EAs. Forget this person and all his EAs he/she may launch from now on.
2. Go to FPA and write a comment about this. I'm giving 1 star.
In my view there was lack of honesty here, I don't know if you agree.
Aug 02, 2012 at 16:21
May 24, 2010からメンバー
354 投稿
therebox posted:
This is what I thought for some time and now I am sure about FxPapa.
Strategy had no losses so it probably was manipulated. They could add a code in the EA so that when 3 trades were open, the EA would automatically increase the risk until it wins, so that no loss never happened in the strategy. This didn't happen in real account. We saw losses when 3 trades were open and now, FxPapa tried to do what probably was made in Strategy, but didn't work this time because the value didn't come back. If 3 trades are open, you are very close to lose, then you can increase the risk, so that they remain open until you wins or lose everything. If DD increases just a little, no potential buyer will be able to notice that a strategy. But this time, it didn't work. DD was too big and account was hidden so that he can sell a few more copies.
Now that everyone knows that there is a lack of honesty here, my suggestion is:
1. change to other EAs. Forget this person and all his EAs he/she may launch from now on.
2. Go to FPA and write a comment about this. I'm giving 1 star.
In my view there was lack of honesty here, I don't know if you agree.
I agree with you. It's scam. Robs inexperienced traders. That was done a second time!
http://www.forexpeacearmy.com/public/review/www.FxPapa.com

forex_trader_32776
Mar 28, 2011からメンバー
942 投稿
Aug 08, 2012 at 02:20
Mar 28, 2011からメンバー
942 投稿
It's not an EA. It's a trade copier signal service with a one time payment. Its not a scam, its only a system that didn't have the right ingredients to survive in the long run. It should have been obvious by the positively inclined equity curve like most grids. Once clients saw how the rules of the system were broken , they should have ditched the system until the dust settled.
This isn't the first time this strategy failed. His first account Blew in 2011 - http://www.myfxbook.com/community/trading-systems/cyber-forex/136966,1
and yes he changed the name to fxpapa and I'm sure he will do it again. A little investigating goes a long way. - http://www.donnaforex.com/forum/index.php?topic=4888.15
This isn't the first time this strategy failed. His first account Blew in 2011 - http://www.myfxbook.com/community/trading-systems/cyber-forex/136966,1
and yes he changed the name to fxpapa and I'm sure he will do it again. A little investigating goes a long way. - http://www.donnaforex.com/forum/index.php?topic=4888.15

forex_trader_32776
Mar 28, 2011からメンバー
942 投稿
Aug 12, 2012 at 16:05
(編集済みのAug 12, 2012 at 16:34)
Sep 29, 2010からメンバー
178 投稿
This EA bombed out
http://www.forexpeacearmy.com/metatrader_expert_advisor/fx_papa/real
Anyone who had used this EA live must have either loss all their money or around 50%
So sorry to hear that!
I am glad I stopped testing this EA a long time ago
http://www.forexpeacearmy.com/metatrader_expert_advisor/fx_papa/real
Anyone who had used this EA live must have either loss all their money or around 50%
So sorry to hear that!
I am glad I stopped testing this EA a long time ago
Get Rich or Die Trying
May 16, 2012からメンバー
27 投稿

forex_trader_45703
Aug 26, 2011からメンバー
31 投稿
Nov 07, 2013 at 06:04
Aug 26, 2011からメンバー
31 投稿
We will see with his second attempt - http://www.myfxbook.com/members/sPhantom/sphantom-auto-trader/585390

*商用利用やスパムは容認されていないので、アカウントが停止される可能性があります。
ヒント:画像/YouTubeのURLを投稿すると自動的に埋め込まれます!
ヒント:この討論に参加しているユーザー名をオートコンプリートするには、@記号を入力します。