Inertia Trader 討論

There is no trade so far. Is this normal?

babyjake1961 posted:

FxMasterGuru posted:
At least now we all know that this EA's profitability is VERY BROKER SPECIFIC.

I have a smaller live account with Tickmill and have great results there too: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/babyjake1961/01062016/1651616/fKH5fPEbSIoKLFQbpbpM

Thanks for sharing this account. As was beginning to fear only worked on FXChoice and I wouldn't open account with a Belize regulated broker. Tickmill now has FCA regulation. I wonder if that reduced liquidity this time of year could have been responsible for the differences in the price feed between Ic Markets and FxChoice also?

I have a GBPUSD Bot started Dec 6 it has traded 7 times 4 losses and 3 wins up 15% overall.
Bob

I see the same trade on tickmill on 3rd January performed better on tickmill by a large pip margin.

FXchoice trade
01.03.2017 18:30 01.04.2017 18:20 EURUSD Buy 73.49 -41.10 167.60 1.04166 1.04847 68.1 49443.51 23h 50m 10.09%
Tickmill Trade
01.03.2017 18:30 01.05.2017 02:05 EURUSD Buy 2.00 -60.20 197.90 1.04168 1.05239 107.1 2108.24 1d 5.28%

Are both accounts just running default risk settings?

The tickmill account has performed better at 30% per month, versus FX choice at 24.67% per month (since 1 June 2016 - using custom analysis). I use tickmill so good to know it runs on this broker without issues being FCA regulated non US clients would be advised to try it on tickmill, I believe. The November and December results for Tickmill and FxChoice percentage gains are very different, so it must be very broker sensitive. Which is okay as long as know which brokers it will do good on. Any other tried on? cheers

therichonedemo1 posted:
There is no trade so far. Is this normal?

Perfectly normal. There are no large price movements on Forex daily.

aeronthomas posted:

babyjake1961 posted:

FxMasterGuru posted:
At least now we all know that this EA's profitability is VERY BROKER SPECIFIC.

I have a smaller live account with Tickmill and have great results there too: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/babyjake1961/01062016/1651616/fKH5fPEbSIoKLFQbpbpM

Thanks for sharing this account. As was beginning to fear only worked on FXChoice and I wouldn't open account with a Belize regulated broker. Tickmill now has FCA regulation. I wonder if that reduced liquidity this time of year could have been responsible for the differences in the price feed between Ic Markets and FxChoice also?

Brokers' price feeds are different because their liquidity providers are different.

aeronthomas posted:
I see the same trade on tickmill on 3rd January performed better on tickmill by a large pip margin.

FXchoice trade
01.03.2017 18:30 01.04.2017 18:20 EURUSD Buy 73.49 -41.10 167.60 1.04166 1.04847 68.1 49443.51 23h 50m 10.09%
Tickmill Trade
01.03.2017 18:30 01.05.2017 02:05 EURUSD Buy 2.00 -60.20 197.90 1.04168 1.05239 107.1 2108.24 1d 5.28%

Are both accounts just running default risk settings?

The tickmill account has performed better at 30% per month, versus FX choice at 24.67% per month (since 1 June 2016 - using custom analysis). I use tickmill so good to know it runs on this broker without issues being FCA regulated non US clients would be advised to try it on tickmill, I believe. The November and December results for Tickmill and FxChoice percentage gains are very different, so it must be very broker sensitive. Which is okay as long as know which brokers it will do good on. Any other tried on? cheers

The EA will do OK with any broker which has reasonable spreads and decent liquidity (no price gaps).

babyjake1961 posted:

aeronthomas posted:
I see the same trade on tickmill on 3rd January performed better on tickmill by a large pip margin.

FXchoice trade
01.03.2017 18:30 01.04.2017 18:20 EURUSD Buy 73.49 -41.10 167.60 1.04166 1.04847 68.1 49443.51 23h 50m 10.09%
Tickmill Trade
01.03.2017 18:30 01.05.2017 02:05 EURUSD Buy 2.00 -60.20 197.90 1.04168 1.05239 107.1 2108.24 1d 5.28%

Are both accounts just running default risk settings?

The tickmill account has performed better at 30% per month, versus FX choice at 24.67% per month (since 1 June 2016 - using custom analysis). I use tickmill so good to know it runs on this broker without issues being FCA regulated non US clients would be advised to try it on tickmill, I believe. The November and December results for Tickmill and FxChoice percentage gains are very different, so it must be very broker sensitive. Which is okay as long as know which brokers it will do good on. Any other tried on? cheers

The EA will do OK with any broker which has reasonable spreads and decent liquidity (no price gaps).

thanks for your replies.

Just got first set of trades opened up on Varianse broker today. Reduced my lots to 0.05 as didn't want full exposure.

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Tritan/gw-inertia/1929382

'Another one bites the dust...'

Anyone like me do not have any trades at all from yesterday?

FxMasterGuru posted:
'Another one bites the dust...'

Are you desperate for quick superprofits?

SleepingFX posted:
Anyone like me do not have any trades at all from yesterday?

Did you have them on the previous trading days? If not, make sure you have ticked the 'Allow live trading' box in your MT4 and have otherwise set up the EA properly on your computer/VPS. If all of that has already been done, please, email [email protected] with your complete log files for assistance.

babyjake1961 posted:

FxMasterGuru posted:
'Another one bites the dust...'

Are you desperate for quick superprofits?

I wish I could see at least ONE trade ending in profit.

Is it too much to expect after shelling out hundreds of dollars for this broker specific EA...?

It seems that my FCA regulated pure DMA/STP broker with extra tight spreads is not good enough...

If all of your trades are losers, clearly logic dictates it is time to question YOUR broker!

fxmill posted:
If all of your trades are losers, clearly logic dictates it is time to question YOUR broker!

Right. Both my FXChoice and Tickmill accounts show excellent profitability over time. Sure, there are occasional drawdowns but only scams don't have them.

FxMasterGuru posted:

babyjake1961 posted:

FxMasterGuru posted:
'Another one bites the dust...'

Are you desperate for quick superprofits?

I wish I could see at least ONE trade ending in profit.

Is it too much to expect after shelling out hundreds of dollars for this broker specific EA...?

It seems that my FCA regulated pure DMA/STP broker with extra tight spreads is not good enough...

fxmasterguru,

i think you need to step back and observe. this ea/strategy i been watching for a while is a good one. and no i did not buy it yet.

as with all strategies there can be huge differences from broker to broker, even from one account to the next, same broker.

this strategy is not a scam like most all, this one is the real deal.

i recommend you run on demo for a few months to get comfortable how it trades.

its break out based which is proven to be a good strategy, dd periods can will always be part of trading.

I traded it this week and it is winning for me. I will say though that the default risk level is frightening and the accounts shared here have so far not really shown what a large drawdown might look like. I estimate that the trades open last night could have taken default accounts down another 30% had it not been for the recovery of the final open trades.
Personally I flinched and closed out the winners early so I could sleep without worrying and in hindsight I prevented huge additional wins. I have dialed it back to 50% of default now and will leave it alone.

Just google 'Inertia Trader MyFXBook' and you'll see links to people's statements with different brokers.