Advertisement
There is no 50% in the Fibonacci sequence
Jan 23, 2013 at 07:28
892 개의 뷰
3 Replies
Feb 18, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물82
Jan 23, 2013 at 07:28
When will dumbo "teachers" and experts finally learn that there is no 50% in the number sequence that Fibonacci copied and published?
FTR it was Gann who harped the 50%, and also the 100/8 or eights in percentages long before the Fibo people were born.
Carry on.
FTR it was Gann who harped the 50%, and also the 100/8 or eights in percentages long before the Fibo people were born.
Carry on.
forex_trader_43716
Aug 06, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물326
Feb 03, 2013 at 21:22
😎
forex_trader_101400
Dec 01, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물59
Feb 04, 2013 at 04:20
fibo sequence 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 etc
ratio betwenn prev and next 0.5, 0.67, 0.6, 0.625
got 50% on first 2 sequence. BUT you are right about Gann.
ratio betwenn prev and next 0.5, 0.67, 0.6, 0.625
got 50% on first 2 sequence. BUT you are right about Gann.
Jan 09, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물263
Mar 05, 2013 at 02:30
(편집됨 Mar 05, 2013 at 02:32)
mikeyap9 posted:
fibo sequence 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 etc
ratio betwenn prev and next 0.5, 0.67, 0.6, 0.625
got 50% on first 2 sequence. BUT you are right about Gann.
If you want to find Fibonacci retracement, use the higher fibonacci number, you'll find the retracement and there is no 50% on the calculation, here's the example of calculation I do on spreadsheet :
http://gyazo.com/76c791badfc2e06c6bc943a69559f9d2
There is no religion higher than truth
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.
