Advertisement
There is no 50% in the Fibonacci sequence
Jan 23, 2013 at 07:28
Przeglądane 892
3 Replies
Uczestnik z Feb 18, 2010
82 postów
Jan 23, 2013 at 07:28
When will dumbo "teachers" and experts finally learn that there is no 50% in the number sequence that Fibonacci copied and published?
FTR it was Gann who harped the 50%, and also the 100/8 or eights in percentages long before the Fibo people were born.
Carry on.
FTR it was Gann who harped the 50%, and also the 100/8 or eights in percentages long before the Fibo people were born.
Carry on.
forex_trader_43716
Uczestnik z Aug 06, 2011
326 postów
Feb 03, 2013 at 21:22
😎
forex_trader_101400
Uczestnik z Dec 01, 2012
59 postów
Feb 04, 2013 at 04:20
fibo sequence 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 etc
ratio betwenn prev and next 0.5, 0.67, 0.6, 0.625
got 50% on first 2 sequence. BUT you are right about Gann.
ratio betwenn prev and next 0.5, 0.67, 0.6, 0.625
got 50% on first 2 sequence. BUT you are right about Gann.
Uczestnik z Jan 09, 2012
263 postów
Mar 05, 2013 at 02:30
(edytowane Mar 05, 2013 at 02:32)
mikeyap9 posted:
fibo sequence 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 etc
ratio betwenn prev and next 0.5, 0.67, 0.6, 0.625
got 50% on first 2 sequence. BUT you are right about Gann.
If you want to find Fibonacci retracement, use the higher fibonacci number, you'll find the retracement and there is no 50% on the calculation, here's the example of calculation I do on spreadsheet :
http://gyazo.com/76c791badfc2e06c6bc943a69559f9d2
There is no religion higher than truth
*Komercyjne wykorzystanie i spam są nieprawidłowe i mogą spowodować zamknięcie konta.
Wskazówka: opublikowanie adresu URL obrazu / YouTube automatycznie wstawi go do twojego postu!
Wskazówka: wpisz znak@, aby automatycznie wypełnić nazwę użytkownika uczestniczącego w tej dyskusji.
