Advertisement
There is no 50% in the Fibonacci sequence
Jan 23, 2013 at 07:28
892流覽
3 Replies
會員從Feb 18, 2010開始
82帖子
Jan 23, 2013 at 07:28
When will dumbo "teachers" and experts finally learn that there is no 50% in the number sequence that Fibonacci copied and published?
FTR it was Gann who harped the 50%, and also the 100/8 or eights in percentages long before the Fibo people were born.
Carry on.
FTR it was Gann who harped the 50%, and also the 100/8 or eights in percentages long before the Fibo people were born.
Carry on.
forex_trader_43716
會員從Aug 06, 2011開始
326帖子
Feb 03, 2013 at 21:22
😎
forex_trader_101400
會員從Dec 01, 2012開始
59帖子
Feb 04, 2013 at 04:20
fibo sequence 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 etc
ratio betwenn prev and next 0.5, 0.67, 0.6, 0.625
got 50% on first 2 sequence. BUT you are right about Gann.
ratio betwenn prev and next 0.5, 0.67, 0.6, 0.625
got 50% on first 2 sequence. BUT you are right about Gann.
會員從Jan 09, 2012開始
263帖子
Mar 05, 2013 at 02:30
(已編輯Mar 05, 2013 at 02:32)
mikeyap9 posted:
fibo sequence 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 etc
ratio betwenn prev and next 0.5, 0.67, 0.6, 0.625
got 50% on first 2 sequence. BUT you are right about Gann.
If you want to find Fibonacci retracement, use the higher fibonacci number, you'll find the retracement and there is no 50% on the calculation, here's the example of calculation I do on spreadsheet :
http://gyazo.com/76c791badfc2e06c6bc943a69559f9d2
There is no religion higher than truth
*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍，並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示：發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中！
提示：鍵入@符號，自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。
