Edit Your Comment
Managing Most Capital
Aug 31, 2016 at 06:54
Aug 10, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물7
Hi guys,
Was wondering what systems you have came across on here that are managing the most capital. I feel this will be hopefully an interesting topic as it is always interesting to see large accounts. Personally the most I have came across on here was around the $5M mark.
Feel free to share links to ones that have $500k+ under management or ideally $1M+
Was wondering what systems you have came across on here that are managing the most capital. I feel this will be hopefully an interesting topic as it is always interesting to see large accounts. Personally the most I have came across on here was around the $5M mark.
Feel free to share links to ones that have $500k+ under management or ideally $1M+
Dec 07, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물51
Dec 07, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물51
Sep 18, 2016 at 06:47
Feb 22, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물4573
Tombuontien posted:
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/FXViperTrading/fx-viper-mamm-ic-markets/960020
It ismartingale without closing loosing positions
Will end up badly
Sep 19, 2016 at 06:33
Jul 25, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물220
cedtrading posted:
Tombuontien
your account is not verified , and why you gain so differant to your absolute gain?
when your account become verified you can back here
His original deposit is different from the amount of which he has in his account now in relation to what he has profited. The account is a real deal and with a trusted broker.I am ok with the martingale but not ok with him letting his orders run as he has. That is what gives martingale a bad rap.
@GJscalper for more information
Sep 19, 2016 at 09:53
Oct 30, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물4
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
Sep 19, 2016 at 09:55
(편집됨 Sep 19, 2016 at 09:56)
Jul 08, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물411
sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
Nah evidence of success just don't cut it, even if it's been running transparently for years. fxviper only made a mere 100% ROI,
*Lowest level of wit ^
Keep at it
Sep 19, 2016 at 11:42
Oct 30, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물4
Magiic posted:sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
Nah evidence of success just don't cut it, even if it's been running transparently for years. fxviper only made a mere 100% ROI,
The investment was about 5 millions $ ,So 100% ROI in 30 months ,average monthly profit 4.4% .
So "only" is not appropriate to describe his excellent results .In professional trading,where 20% yearly profit considered good ROI ,his winning are huge.
Sep 19, 2016 at 12:36
Jul 08, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물411
sam1212 posted:Magiic posted:sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
Nah evidence of success just don't cut it, even if it's been running transparently for years. fxviper only made a mere 100% ROI,
The investment was about 5 millions $ ,So 100% ROI in 30 months ,average monthly profit 4.4% .
So "only" is not appropriate to describe his excellent results .In professional trading,where 20% yearly profit considered good ROI ,his winning are huge.
It is a very good return!
Keep at it
Dec 07, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물51
Sep 22, 2016 at 06:13
Dec 07, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물51
GJscalper posted:cedtrading posted:
Tombuontien
your account is not verified , and why you gain so differant to your absolute gain?
when your account become verified you can back here
His original deposit is different from the amount of which he has in his account now in relation to what he has profited. The account is a real deal and with a trusted broker.I am ok with the martingale but not ok with him letting his orders run as he has. That is what gives martingale a bad rap.
yes i know , what i mean is a lot of peoples have big difference between gain/absolut gain cause when have some trades start in bad way they can put more money in trading account for keep law drawdown. But in this case i agree with you, you are right, its doesn't matter cause the trading account is big.... up to 5millions $ . So i can't imagin the guy put more money for keep small DD 😂
Sep 22, 2016 at 08:27
Feb 22, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물4573
sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
I had such martingale - running for 3 years, 400% profit and it wiped account at the end.
Moreover this guy did not close open positions that are loosing more and more money
Sep 22, 2016 at 10:05
Jul 08, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물411
togr posted:sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
I had such martingale - running for 3 years, 400% profit and it wiped account at the end.
Moreover this guy did not close open positions that are loosing more and more money
3 years without blowing up is reasonable, I've seen manual traders last as long and blow up, does that mean manual trading is flawed? Yes and no and same goes for MM strategies.
"Losing more and more money" he is 5% down.. I don't see how that's bad at all?
Keep at it

*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.