Advertisement
Managing Most Capital
Aug 31, 2016 at 06:54
943 การดู
17 Replies
Aug 31, 2016 at 06:54
Hi guys,
Was wondering what systems you have came across on here that are managing the most capital. I feel this will be hopefully an interesting topic as it is always interesting to see large accounts. Personally the most I have came across on here was around the $5M mark.
Feel free to share links to ones that have $500k+ under management or ideally $1M+
Was wondering what systems you have came across on here that are managing the most capital. I feel this will be hopefully an interesting topic as it is always interesting to see large accounts. Personally the most I have came across on here was around the $5M mark.
Feel free to share links to ones that have $500k+ under management or ideally $1M+
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 07, 2015
51 โพสต์
Sep 08, 2016 at 06:53
yes me too i am interested to follow this kind of account in real money. Just for look the way people can manage it and sleep well the night.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 26, 2014
23 โพสต์
Sep 09, 2016 at 02:34
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 07, 2015
51 โพสต์
Sep 11, 2016 at 06:32
Tombuontien
your account is not verified , and why you gain so differant to your absolute gain?
when your account become verified you can back here
your account is not verified , and why you gain so differant to your absolute gain?
when your account become verified you can back here
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 28, 2016
3 โพสต์
Sep 16, 2016 at 06:43
Hi guys! Beware from these mega gain ATM. They almost all based on martingale
it ends like this:
it ends like this:
ไฟล์แนบ :
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2011
4573 โพสต์
Sep 18, 2016 at 06:47
Tombuontien posted:
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/FXViperTrading/fx-viper-mamm-ic-markets/960020
It ismartingale without closing loosing positions
Will end up badly
Sep 19, 2016 at 06:33
cedtrading posted:
Tombuontien
your account is not verified , and why you gain so differant to your absolute gain?
when your account become verified you can back here
His original deposit is different from the amount of which he has in his account now in relation to what he has profited. The account is a real deal and with a trusted broker.I am ok with the martingale but not ok with him letting his orders run as he has. That is what gives martingale a bad rap.
@GJscalper for more information
Sep 19, 2016 at 09:53
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
Sep 19, 2016 at 09:55
(แก้ไขแล้ว Sep 19, 2016 at 09:56)
sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
Nah evidence of success just don't cut it, even if it's been running transparently for years. fxviper only made a mere 100% ROI,
*Lowest level of wit ^
Keep at it
Sep 19, 2016 at 11:42
Magiic posted:sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
Nah evidence of success just don't cut it, even if it's been running transparently for years. fxviper only made a mere 100% ROI,
The investment was about 5 millions $ ,So 100% ROI in 30 months ,average monthly profit 4.4% .
So "only" is not appropriate to describe his excellent results .In professional trading,where 20% yearly profit considered good ROI ,his winning are huge.
Sep 19, 2016 at 12:36
sam1212 posted:Magiic posted:sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
Nah evidence of success just don't cut it, even if it's been running transparently for years. fxviper only made a mere 100% ROI,
The investment was about 5 millions $ ,So 100% ROI in 30 months ,average monthly profit 4.4% .
So "only" is not appropriate to describe his excellent results .In professional trading,where 20% yearly profit considered good ROI ,his winning are huge.
It is a very good return!
Keep at it
forex_trader_29148
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 11, 2011
1768 โพสต์
Sep 19, 2016 at 21:28
the best ever tested signal provider
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 07, 2015
51 โพสต์
Sep 22, 2016 at 06:13
GJscalper posted:cedtrading posted:
Tombuontien
your account is not verified , and why you gain so differant to your absolute gain?
when your account become verified you can back here
His original deposit is different from the amount of which he has in his account now in relation to what he has profited. The account is a real deal and with a trusted broker.I am ok with the martingale but not ok with him letting his orders run as he has. That is what gives martingale a bad rap.
yes i know , what i mean is a lot of peoples have big difference between gain/absolut gain cause when have some trades start in bad way they can put more money in trading account for keep law drawdown. But in this case i agree with you, you are right, its doesn't matter cause the trading account is big.... up to 5millions $ . So i can't imagin the guy put more money for keep small DD 😂
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2011
4573 โพสต์
Sep 22, 2016 at 08:27
sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
I had such martingale - running for 3 years, 400% profit and it wiped account at the end.
Moreover this guy did not close open positions that are loosing more and more money
Sep 22, 2016 at 10:05
togr posted:sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
I had such martingale - running for 3 years, 400% profit and it wiped account at the end.
Moreover this guy did not close open positions that are loosing more and more money
3 years without blowing up is reasonable, I've seen manual traders last as long and blow up, does that mean manual trading is flawed? Yes and no and same goes for MM strategies.
"Losing more and more money" he is 5% down.. I don't see how that's bad at all?
Keep at it
*การใช้งานเชิงพาณิชย์และสแปมจะไม่ได้รับการยอมรับ และอาจส่งผลให้บัญชีถูกยกเลิก
เคล็ดลับ: การโพสต์รูปภาพ/youtube url จะฝังลงในโพสต์ของคุณโดยอัตโนมัติ!
เคล็ดลับ: พิมพ์เครื่องหมาย @ เพื่อป้อนชื่อผู้ใช้ที่เข้าร่วมการสนทนานี้โดยอัตโนมัติ
