Edit Your Comment
Managing Most Capital
Aug 31, 2016 at 06:54
會員從Aug 10, 2016開始
7帖子
Hi guys,
Was wondering what systems you have came across on here that are managing the most capital. I feel this will be hopefully an interesting topic as it is always interesting to see large accounts. Personally the most I have came across on here was around the $5M mark.
Feel free to share links to ones that have $500k+ under management or ideally $1M+
Was wondering what systems you have came across on here that are managing the most capital. I feel this will be hopefully an interesting topic as it is always interesting to see large accounts. Personally the most I have came across on here was around the $5M mark.
Feel free to share links to ones that have $500k+ under management or ideally $1M+
會員從Dec 07, 2015開始
51帖子
會員從Dec 07, 2015開始
51帖子
Sep 18, 2016 at 06:47
會員從Feb 22, 2011開始
4573帖子
Tombuontien posted:
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/FXViperTrading/fx-viper-mamm-ic-markets/960020
It ismartingale without closing loosing positions
Will end up badly
Sep 19, 2016 at 06:33
會員從Jul 25, 2016開始
220帖子
cedtrading posted:
Tombuontien
your account is not verified , and why you gain so differant to your absolute gain?
when your account become verified you can back here
His original deposit is different from the amount of which he has in his account now in relation to what he has profited. The account is a real deal and with a trusted broker.I am ok with the martingale but not ok with him letting his orders run as he has. That is what gives martingale a bad rap.
@GJscalper for more information
Sep 19, 2016 at 09:53
會員從Oct 30, 2014開始
4帖子
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
Sep 19, 2016 at 09:55
(已編輯Sep 19, 2016 at 09:56)
會員從Jul 08, 2014開始
411帖子
sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
Nah evidence of success just don't cut it, even if it's been running transparently for years. fxviper only made a mere 100% ROI,
*Lowest level of wit ^
Keep at it
Sep 19, 2016 at 11:42
會員從Oct 30, 2014開始
4帖子
Magiic posted:sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
Nah evidence of success just don't cut it, even if it's been running transparently for years. fxviper only made a mere 100% ROI,
The investment was about 5 millions $ ,So 100% ROI in 30 months ,average monthly profit 4.4% .
So "only" is not appropriate to describe his excellent results .In professional trading,where 20% yearly profit considered good ROI ,his winning are huge.
Sep 19, 2016 at 12:36
會員從Jul 08, 2014開始
411帖子
sam1212 posted:Magiic posted:sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
Nah evidence of success just don't cut it, even if it's been running transparently for years. fxviper only made a mere 100% ROI,
The investment was about 5 millions $ ,So 100% ROI in 30 months ,average monthly profit 4.4% .
So "only" is not appropriate to describe his excellent results .In professional trading,where 20% yearly profit considered good ROI ,his winning are huge.
It is a very good return!
Keep at it
會員從Dec 07, 2015開始
51帖子
Sep 22, 2016 at 06:13
會員從Dec 07, 2015開始
51帖子
GJscalper posted:cedtrading posted:
Tombuontien
your account is not verified , and why you gain so differant to your absolute gain?
when your account become verified you can back here
His original deposit is different from the amount of which he has in his account now in relation to what he has profited. The account is a real deal and with a trusted broker.I am ok with the martingale but not ok with him letting his orders run as he has. That is what gives martingale a bad rap.
yes i know , what i mean is a lot of peoples have big difference between gain/absolut gain cause when have some trades start in bad way they can put more money in trading account for keep law drawdown. But in this case i agree with you, you are right, its doesn't matter cause the trading account is big.... up to 5millions $ . So i can't imagin the guy put more money for keep small DD 😂
Sep 22, 2016 at 08:27
會員從Feb 22, 2011開始
4573帖子
sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
I had such martingale - running for 3 years, 400% profit and it wiped account at the end.
Moreover this guy did not close open positions that are loosing more and more money
Sep 22, 2016 at 10:05
會員從Jul 08, 2014開始
411帖子
togr posted:sam1212 posted:
Come on guys, this fxviper has 3 years track record with a respectable broker ,only 1 or or 2 losing months with huge amount of money to invest ,and still some are suspecting he is a scam .Are you serious ?
And if martingale could survive 3 years with 250% profit ,than we all should start trading martingale .
I had such martingale - running for 3 years, 400% profit and it wiped account at the end.
Moreover this guy did not close open positions that are loosing more and more money
3 years without blowing up is reasonable, I've seen manual traders last as long and blow up, does that mean manual trading is flawed? Yes and no and same goes for MM strategies.
"Losing more and more money" he is 5% down.. I don't see how that's bad at all?
Keep at it

*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。