Edit Your Comment
Do you prefer fixed spreads or dynamic spreads?
會員從Jun 12, 2016開始
16帖子
Jun 12, 2016 at 18:43
會員從Jun 12, 2016開始
16帖子
execution speed on floating spread is always better rather than using fixed spread, the bad thing with floating spread is dangereous if you use hedging as your strategy because spread can widen during weekend or spike on news releases
nothing is impossible
會員從Mar 28, 2016開始
94帖子
Jun 14, 2016 at 08:35
會員從Dec 11, 2015開始
1462帖子
herodontcry posted:
execution speed on floating spread is always better rather than using fixed spread, the bad thing with floating spread is dangereous if you use hedging as your strategy because spread can widen during weekend or spike on news releases
To be honest, the spread widening during news events is dangerous even if you're not hedging. It can widen considerably, take your stop and then the pair continues on its merry way in the direction you were expecting.
Sep 21, 2016 at 10:55
會員從Sep 14, 2016開始
17帖子
It is suggested to go for variable spreads as the price feeds are direct from LP's. So in fixed spread your broker can be market maker. Also if you are day trader go for variable spread but being a long term trader you can earn with fixed spreads at the time of events or news as spread is larger at that time.😐
會員從Oct 01, 2015開始
47帖子
Oct 22, 2016 at 11:13
會員從Dec 11, 2015開始
1462帖子
CliveCampbell posted:
it's dangerous for sure to trade with dynamic spreads during news, but there is always a good chance to make a profit
True. On the other hand, it carries considerable risk, and said risk is too much for me, so I avoid trading during that time.
Oct 25, 2016 at 07:26
會員從Feb 12, 2016開始
507帖子
trading with fixed spread could save you during big spikes and is a bit better for news trading, but with fixed spread you pay a lot more in the mark up as with dynamic spread. If you accept the risks of the market and the dynamic srpeads you are paying less for your trading volume. Paying 1.5 Pip fixed Spread for 1 lot is more expensive than lets say paying 8 EUR Commission with dynamic 0.2 Pips spread . The difference is 5 EUR for each 1 lot traded.
會員從Mar 14, 2016開始
36帖子
Oct 25, 2016 at 08:50
會員從Mar 14, 2016開始
36帖子
It all depends on strategy, but I usually stay away from fixed spreads, because sometimes, brokers are having mark up on the fixed spreads. But some EA's are better working with fixed spreads, so like I explain before it all depends on the type of strategy that you are using.
會員從Sep 15, 2016開始
24帖子
Oct 27, 2016 at 12:51
會員從Sep 15, 2016開始
24帖子
In my view, variable spreads are better than fixed spreads. The reason being is the trading cost. For example, normally in case of variable spread, a commission (like around $4 per $100k) is charged to you and the average spread tends to remain around 0.3 or 0.5 pips so the total trading cost tends to remain below 1 pip (while it also depends on broker to broker, if you are going for ECN or STP account and what commission they are charging). While, in case of fixed spread, in normal market conditions the trading cost remains generally higher at 2 pips. If you go for variable spreads, during the time of high volumes, it can go to 0.0 pips as well for EURUSD or GBPUSD, in that case your variable cost goes even further down but it does not happen in fixed spread thus leading to higher trading cost. Also, fixed spreads don’t remain the fixed always, at the time of news, even fixed spreads get widen, you will see your spread fixed at say 2 pip only however if you try to buy or sell, you will see a different execution price from what you are seeing.
會員從Oct 08, 2015開始
35帖子
Nov 02, 2016 at 07:34
會員從Oct 08, 2015開始
35帖子
olivia_jones posted:
In my view, variable spreads are better than fixed spreads. The reason being is the trading cost. For example, normally in case of variable spread, a commission (like around $4 per $100k) is charged to you and the average spread tends to remain around 0.3 or 0.5 pips so the total trading cost tends to remain below 1 pip (while it also depends on broker to broker, if you are going for ECN or STP account and what commission they are charging). While, in case of fixed spread, in normal market conditions the trading cost remains generally higher at 2 pips. If you go for variable spreads, during the time of high volumes, it can go to 0.0 pips as well for EURUSD or GBPUSD, in that case your variable cost goes even further down but it does not happen in fixed spread thus leading to higher trading cost. Also, fixed spreads don’t remain the fixed always, at the time of news, even fixed spreads get widen, you will see your spread fixed at say 2 pip only however if you try to buy or sell, you will see a different execution price from what you are seeing.
I also agree that fixed spread can be more costly over long term!
Trading is like football - if you don't practice you can't win the game!
會員從Oct 08, 2015開始
35帖子
Nov 02, 2016 at 07:34
會員從Oct 08, 2015開始
35帖子
I prefer the floating spreads but also to have the commission separate and shown in full when I open the trade. This gives me a clear picture of the costs involved and how much should I earn at least to be on profit.
Trading is like football - if you don't practice you can't win the game!
會員從Oct 01, 2015開始
47帖子
Nov 03, 2016 at 07:20
會員從Oct 01, 2015開始
47帖子
BaldoN posted:
trading with fixed spread could save you during big spikes and is a bit better for news trading, but with fixed spread you pay a lot more in the mark up as with dynamic spread. If you accept the risks of the market and the dynamic srpeads you are paying less for your trading volume. Paying 1.5 Pip fixed Spread for 1 lot is more expensive than lets say paying 8 EUR Commission with dynamic 0.2 Pips spread . The difference is 5 EUR for each 1 lot traded.
Very good point and great explanation. Thanks for this
會員從Oct 01, 2015開始
47帖子

*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。