Advertisement
FXStabilizer - Turbo_OldUpdateMethod
사용자가 이 시스템을 삭제했습니다.
FXStabilizer - Turbo_OldUpdateMethod 토론
forex_trader_222324
Dec 18, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물5
Nov 15, 2015 at 08:59
I also own this EA and I'm quite impressed with it so far. The results I get from the strategy tester are really good and so far they match the real trades it has done on my life account, including the crashes. The EA uses pending orders so I don't have to worry too much about the latency of my VPS.
My account is in the red at the moment as I started using this EA on turbo setting just before that crash in October. However I should recover soon, and like Rob I survived the other crash about the US unemployment data.
So yeah I'm guessing either the vendor had a lower different risk setting to mine during the US employment data which would have hit the SL, or they manually closed their trades while they were floating in the red.
My account is in the red at the moment as I started using this EA on turbo setting just before that crash in October. However I should recover soon, and like Rob I survived the other crash about the US unemployment data.
So yeah I'm guessing either the vendor had a lower different risk setting to mine during the US employment data which would have hit the SL, or they manually closed their trades while they were floating in the red.
Dec 10, 2015 at 07:54
Well, basically it is a martingale system where you can define the max level of DD in your account. For example, see the 30% DD in october. That is because author defined this as the maximum loss. Afer that, they increase the max dd to 100% and that explains the fast recovery.
Risky system.
The stable version is very safe but the profitability is really poor for the risk that you take.
Regards.
Risky system.
The stable version is very safe but the profitability is really poor for the risk that you take.
Regards.
forex_trader_222324
Dec 18, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물5
Mar 08, 2016 at 07:55
Which broker are you with and what risk were you using?
I also got a loss on that day on my real account with 40% risk, but I didn't on my demo account which has a risk of 80%.
I also got a loss on that day on my real account with 40% risk, but I didn't on my demo account which has a risk of 80%.
Mar 08, 2016 at 08:08
I am using FXpro and 30 per cent risk.
I checked my historical with vendor's. In my case TP was touched at 0.73532 closing four deals. Therefore i did not get the last transaction.
The funny thing is that price reached a minimum of 0.73393 according to my broker.
I checked my historical with vendor's. In my case TP was touched at 0.73532 closing four deals. Therefore i did not get the last transaction.
The funny thing is that price reached a minimum of 0.73393 according to my broker.
forex_trader_76137
May 03, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물57
Dec 15, 2016 at 19:49
futama99 posted:
No trading in December?
Hi! It's just monitoring stuck. Already updated
forex_trader_203139
Aug 09, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물26
Apr 27, 2017 at 19:09
Why is the monitoring off ?
forex_trader_76137
May 03, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물57
Aug 24, 2017 at 22:25
Hello dear friends! Because of old updating method at this account (page), we can't fully verified it at myfxbook. That is why we added it with new method updating and it fully verified already. We don't want to close this old one, because all conversation is here, but we can't guaranty that this account will be updating correctly all the time.
Actual and main monitoring of account is here:
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/fx_skill/fxstabilizer-aud-turbo/2126989
Actual and main monitoring of account is here:
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/fx_skill/fxstabilizer-aud-turbo/2126989
Sep 03, 2017 at 14:57
I wonder, why you did not increase the risk after the first emergency stop in July this time like in all the other cases before? By this the account would have been gone with the second stop right afterwards unfortunately. Instead you have been damn lucky.
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance.
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you for the insight.
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance.
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you for the insight.
Oct 09, 2017 at 06:30
I wonder, why you did not increase the risk after the first emergency stop in July this time like in all the other cases before? By this the account would have been gone with the second stop right afterwards unfortunately.
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance. Is there cheating? Please explain
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance. Is there cheating? Please explain
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you
forex_trader_76137
May 03, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물57
Oct 10, 2017 at 12:32
Drolph posted:
I wonder, why you did not increase the risk after the first emergency stop in July this time like in all the other cases before? By this the account would have been gone with the second stop right afterwards unfortunately. Instead you have been damn lucky.
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance.
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you for the insight.
Hello!
Yes this account is rather risky, that is why we increase lotsize after loss. You are right, we didn't increase lotsize for next trades after loss, the reason of that is very funny. We just did not have time to raise the risk, because next trades began almost instantly after first loss 😄 Screenshot is attached
But as you can see even double loss was recovered by system for a little more than a month.
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.
