Advertisement
FXStabilizer - Turbo_OldUpdateMethod
該使用者已經刪除了這個系統。
FXStabilizer - Turbo_OldUpdateMethod討論
forex_trader_222324
會員從Dec 18, 2014開始
5帖子
Nov 15, 2015 at 08:59
I also own this EA and I'm quite impressed with it so far. The results I get from the strategy tester are really good and so far they match the real trades it has done on my life account, including the crashes. The EA uses pending orders so I don't have to worry too much about the latency of my VPS.
My account is in the red at the moment as I started using this EA on turbo setting just before that crash in October. However I should recover soon, and like Rob I survived the other crash about the US unemployment data.
So yeah I'm guessing either the vendor had a lower different risk setting to mine during the US employment data which would have hit the SL, or they manually closed their trades while they were floating in the red.
My account is in the red at the moment as I started using this EA on turbo setting just before that crash in October. However I should recover soon, and like Rob I survived the other crash about the US unemployment data.
So yeah I'm guessing either the vendor had a lower different risk setting to mine during the US employment data which would have hit the SL, or they manually closed their trades while they were floating in the red.
Dec 10, 2015 at 07:54
Well, basically it is a martingale system where you can define the max level of DD in your account. For example, see the 30% DD in october. That is because author defined this as the maximum loss. Afer that, they increase the max dd to 100% and that explains the fast recovery.
Risky system.
The stable version is very safe but the profitability is really poor for the risk that you take.
Regards.
Risky system.
The stable version is very safe but the profitability is really poor for the risk that you take.
Regards.
forex_trader_222324
會員從Dec 18, 2014開始
5帖子
Mar 08, 2016 at 07:55
Which broker are you with and what risk were you using?
I also got a loss on that day on my real account with 40% risk, but I didn't on my demo account which has a risk of 80%.
I also got a loss on that day on my real account with 40% risk, but I didn't on my demo account which has a risk of 80%.
Mar 08, 2016 at 08:08
I am using FXpro and 30 per cent risk.
I checked my historical with vendor's. In my case TP was touched at 0.73532 closing four deals. Therefore i did not get the last transaction.
The funny thing is that price reached a minimum of 0.73393 according to my broker.
I checked my historical with vendor's. In my case TP was touched at 0.73532 closing four deals. Therefore i did not get the last transaction.
The funny thing is that price reached a minimum of 0.73393 according to my broker.
forex_trader_76137
會員從May 03, 2012開始
57帖子
Dec 15, 2016 at 19:49
futama99 posted:
No trading in December?
Hi! It's just monitoring stuck. Already updated
forex_trader_203139
會員從Aug 09, 2014開始
26帖子
Apr 27, 2017 at 19:09
Why is the monitoring off ?
forex_trader_76137
會員從May 03, 2012開始
57帖子
Aug 24, 2017 at 22:25
Hello dear friends! Because of old updating method at this account (page), we can't fully verified it at myfxbook. That is why we added it with new method updating and it fully verified already. We don't want to close this old one, because all conversation is here, but we can't guaranty that this account will be updating correctly all the time.
Actual and main monitoring of account is here:
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/fx_skill/fxstabilizer-aud-turbo/2126989
Actual and main monitoring of account is here:
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/fx_skill/fxstabilizer-aud-turbo/2126989
Sep 03, 2017 at 14:57
I wonder, why you did not increase the risk after the first emergency stop in July this time like in all the other cases before? By this the account would have been gone with the second stop right afterwards unfortunately. Instead you have been damn lucky.
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance.
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you for the insight.
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance.
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you for the insight.
Oct 09, 2017 at 06:30
I wonder, why you did not increase the risk after the first emergency stop in July this time like in all the other cases before? By this the account would have been gone with the second stop right afterwards unfortunately.
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance. Is there cheating? Please explain
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance. Is there cheating? Please explain
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you
forex_trader_76137
會員從May 03, 2012開始
57帖子
Oct 10, 2017 at 12:32
Drolph posted:
I wonder, why you did not increase the risk after the first emergency stop in July this time like in all the other cases before? By this the account would have been gone with the second stop right afterwards unfortunately. Instead you have been damn lucky.
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance.
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you for the insight.
Hello!
Yes this account is rather risky, that is why we increase lotsize after loss. You are right, we didn't increase lotsize for next trades after loss, the reason of that is very funny. We just did not have time to raise the risk, because next trades began almost instantly after first loss 😄 Screenshot is attached
But as you can see even double loss was recovered by system for a little more than a month.
*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍，並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示：發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中！
提示：鍵入@符號，自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。
