Чтобы пользоваться чатом, пожалуйста, войдите в систему
Обратно к контактам

I want only a safe 4% each month... Which EA?? Thank you

forexpipcatcher
Feb 18 2013 at 07:35
286 комментариев
Anmaric_LTD posted:
Here is the answare for the original question:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Anmaric_LTD/rhov13/482225


Your system is crap otherwise you wouldn't hide trades ... face reality you trade a small account because you are like the rest of us here

optimofx (optimofx)
Feb 18 2013 at 09:22
250 комментариев
I dont gonna discuss more about that theme , i think my response was clear. Leverage dont determine ur risk, only ur lots, ur SL and ur actual balance determine the % of the risk. Seems like Fx Master Guru talk another language than mine.

Caution ¡¡ Forex market is full of scams ¡¡
FxMasterGuru (FxMasterGuru)
Feb 18 2013 at 10:42
1607 комментариев
optimofx posted:
I dont gonna discuss more about that theme , i think my response was clear. Leverage dont determine ur risk, only ur lots, ur SL and ur actual balance determine the % of the risk. Seems like Fx Master Guru talk another language than mine.


Actually you have stated the truth, OptimoFx. It is absolutely correct that your lots AND balance determine the risk, which is - SURPRISE! - the leverage itself, as leverage is the ratio of the traded lots and the balance behind it.

I was referring to this - leverage related - risk as 'EXTRINSIC risk', BECAUSE each and every trader using the same exact EA with the same exact parameters, but using different leverages would have different % loss and gain (depending on the leverage ratios).

Of course, the mentioned SL (as the 3rd risk factor) is another important component of the general risk, but this SL related risk is inherent to (ie. programmed into) the actual strategy, and that is why I had referred to it as INTRINSIC risk.

At least we are on the same page now.

Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
forexpipcatcher
Feb 18 2013 at 14:22
286 комментариев
You both were always on the same page... which is 17 now lol, so get back to 4% per month!
Can we do it or not?
Because most scammers if they are able to do it will hide the strategy and give another, so one will never find out the truth.
So what are we at?

FxMasterGuru (FxMasterGuru)
Feb 18 2013 at 21:30
1607 комментариев
Safe 4% per month is probably possible by a well-built EA or a very-very disciplined trader. Considering that only the best hedge funds can produce stable(!) 30-40% per year, stable 4% per month would actually outperform these hedge funds.

Although currently I am targeting 6-10% per month, with larger capital a stable 4-5% profit per month is what I also strive for (https://www.myfxbook.com/members/FxMasterGuru/morningstar-i/407015).

Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
forexpipcatcher
Feb 19 2013 at 02:02
286 комментариев
I'm doing the same but my target is double your's. I do have admirers wanting to use my system and will be going on live with real in the next week or so and after some observations the admirers might crank it up a notch or three.
You'rs is interesting because it seems you are using MM so when the account is growing you are trading with larger lots. Yes?

arabelus
Feb 19 2013 at 09:56
5 комментариев
I think actualy it is doable, but you have to be very very disciplined specially with your money management. I am searching for similar set up and have been intensively studying and experimenting with friends over the last year and a half (doing forward tests and running tons of 5 year long backtests). I say it is not easy but i think we have couple of quite promising scenarios worked out :)

FxMasterGuru (FxMasterGuru)
Feb 19 2013 at 10:02
1607 комментариев
forexpipcatcher posted:
I'm doing the same but my target is double your's. I do have admirers wanting to use my system and will be going on live with real in the next week or so and after some observations the admirers might crank it up a notch or three.
You'rs is interesting because it seems you are using MM so when the account is growing you are trading with larger lots. Yes?


Yes, your observation is absolutely correct. The MM applied helps to reduce the neagtive effect of the losing streaks and enhance the postive effect of the winning streaks. In additon, I am also feeding my account on a regular basis (which is the reason why the absolute gain is less than the calculated Gain%).

Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
FxMasterGuru (FxMasterGuru)
Feb 19 2013 at 10:07
1607 комментариев
arabelus posted:
I think actualy it is doable, but you have to be very very disciplined specially with your money management. I am searching for similar set up and have been intensively studying and experimenting with friends over the last year and a half (doing forward tests and running tons of 5 year long backtests). I say it is not easy but i think we have couple of quite promising scenarios worked out :)


Yes, MM is as important as the strategy itself. My current EA is a result of 4 years's of trial-error (mostly error) and hundreds of hours of screen-time of two traders and a talented programmer. I suggest reading Malcolm Gladwell's bestseller book, the 'Outliers', which explains the 'secret' behind all major achievements. (You will be surprised...)

Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
forexpipcatcher
Feb 19 2013 at 11:23
286 комментариев
Have you any clue to what ouliers are?
I teach these kind of things daily! Your problem is random sampling over a population which there does not exit any consistent pattern. Although fools think they detect a pettern only to learn later it's a misconception.
Programmers are not talented otherwise they would be professional traders making money lol. They are talented scammers out to get anyones money, that is what they ecel at, as for Malcoms Bullshitwells I don't read any losers achievements or I will end up like them. However I will read something from someone with a proven track record i.e has a fortune made from trading etc not someone pretending to have known another with a fortune from trading like 99% of scammers say they have.

I wouldn't mind seeing your MT4 statement (just the analysis table). That would if analysed correctly show statistically your chances of survival over an extended period of time and if your MM dampens your chances of success as time approaches infinity.

Пожалуйста, войдите в систему, чтобы комментировать .