Anyone noticed any discrepancies (problems) with MFP Autotrading ?
May 03, 2014 at 22:45
390 Просмотры
7 Replies
Участник с Jan 20, 2010
45 комментариев
May 03, 2014 at 22:45
(отредактировано May 03, 2014 at 22:47)
Hello all. I tried Zulutrade before ,and I found it completely unreliable ,or may I say , scam. I have a famous review on it ,back in 2010.
I am familiar with many disconnection problems ,slippage ,Orphan trades (trades that have not been closed on our terminal) , difference in quotes ,profit,loss..etc,
Anyone noticed any of these problems with MFB ?? All I see is followers complaining about traders performance ,but I don't see any complaint about MFB system. Which is a good sign.
I am also contemplating Mlq5 auto trading , but these guys are really lax ,and they don't have any standards towards signal providers. Any bad trader can supply signals. I like the idea of MFB providing strict criterion to allow traders to provide their signals. Which implies that MFB care about protecting their clients funds😇.
I am familiar with many disconnection problems ,slippage ,Orphan trades (trades that have not been closed on our terminal) , difference in quotes ,profit,loss..etc,
Anyone noticed any of these problems with MFB ?? All I see is followers complaining about traders performance ,but I don't see any complaint about MFB system. Which is a good sign.
I am also contemplating Mlq5 auto trading , but these guys are really lax ,and they don't have any standards towards signal providers. Any bad trader can supply signals. I like the idea of MFB providing strict criterion to allow traders to provide their signals. Which implies that MFB care about protecting their clients funds😇.
Участник с Jan 14, 2014
386 комментариев
May 04, 2014 at 01:34
There are many good traders out there on myfxbook, why you need looking for somewhere else? 😕
Участник с Jan 20, 2010
45 комментариев
May 04, 2014 at 11:20
Yes man. I see many great traders. I am just asking about MFB system. Also sometimes the Broker will try to vandalise your tradings and make you lose money.
Участник с Feb 22, 2011
4862 комментариев
May 05, 2014 at 12:37
It is strange that MFB is offering just couple of systems to autotrade.
While there are many better systems on MFB
I wonder if this on purpose to e.g make a lot of trades and thus a lot of commission.
or if it is just stupidity?
While there are many better systems on MFB
I wonder if this on purpose to e.g make a lot of trades and thus a lot of commission.
or if it is just stupidity?
Участник с Jan 14, 2014
386 комментариев
May 05, 2014 at 14:44
togr posted:
It is strange that MFB is offering just couple of systems to autotrade.
While there are many better systems on MFB
I wonder if this on purpose to e.g make a lot of trades and thus a lot of commission.
or if it is just stupidity?
I think because of traders just have 0.5 pip/winning trades only 😳
If traders have commission based on performance (20 or 25%) I am sure there are a lot traders joining.
Участник с Feb 22, 2011
4862 комментариев
May 05, 2014 at 14:46
ProTradersGroup posted:togr posted:
It is strange that MFB is offering just couple of systems to autotrade.
While there are many better systems on MFB
I wonder if this on purpose to e.g make a lot of trades and thus a lot of commission.
or if it is just stupidity?
I think because of traders just have 0.5 pip/winning trades only 😳
If traders have commission based on performance (20 or 25%) I am sure there are a lot traders joining.
The reward is sufficient but I think MFG guys do reject many systems
Участник с Jan 14, 2014
386 комментариев
May 05, 2014 at 14:47
I don't think so 😄
Участник с Jan 20, 2010
45 комментариев
May 05, 2014 at 14:59
i think there are maltitude of good traders that are not interested enough in auto trading. Percentage based can be very bad . Because it will motivate traders to adopt dangerous strategies.
*Коммерческое использование и спам не допускаются и могут привести к аннулированию аккаунта.
Совет: Размещенные изображения или ссылки на Youtube автоматически вставляются в ваше сообщение!
Совет: введите знак @ для автоматического заполнения имени пользователя, участвующего в этом обсуждении.
