Anthony Wins Обсуждение

profitBottle posted:
@oportunis

Let Tony answer, if he wants, the questions that are addressed to him.
You also forget about such a concept as the presumption of innocence, when no one except the accusing party is obliged to provide any evidence. So, I also want to know what kind of "proof" you are talking about.

You probably misunderstood me, I'm just a pamm ib client of accent and sure I don't have such information. But I can tell you for sure that none of the brokers, regardless of their reputation, will give you an audit of financials except for companies whose shares are publicly traded on the stock exchange.
If you think that this information can be provided, show who and when gave it to you. You defend icemarkets so much that it's even a little suspicious .. (I'm not against them, just my opinion).

VancouverRain posted:

Mathias88 posted:

VancouverRain posted:
My questions were not answered! They were just telling me to read again the document I signed when I registered.
We are dealing with a 10 million dollars "mistake" or fraud" here. Of course, non of the brokers will not show their books at anyone's request...and we are not talking about a few hundred dollars win or loss.

who are 'we' in your post? i have got the only thing is you are or were the follower of this account. you still didnt answer what exactly you were explained. well, so be it, apparently you have your own aims. I see you do not want to figure it out, you already KNOW and DECIDED everything for yourself.
what abstract numbers are you talking about? how much exactly did you lose? or maybe you have got a profit?
i already wrote something similar somewhere on the forum, but i can repeat it here:
investors must understand the risks of forex and diversify risks by investing in different accounts or areas. and if they got money to burn, then there is no need to talk about their money. this is my 2 cents

How much I have lost is not your business.

Who blow up the account? You can ask Tony!

vortexz posted:
Why all good traders use bad brokers? I don't get it

MP_89 posted:
and this is being told to me by a prehistoric man who, i suppose, still cannot believe all these "new technologies" and draws a market chart by hand. Richi dear don't make me laugh. 😁😁😁
what can someone like you know about artificial intelligence or the work of advisors?

MP_89 posted:
and this is being told to me by a prehistoric man who, i suppose, still cannot believe all these "new technologies" and draws a market chart by hand.

MP_89 posted:
ea'll help beginners by analyzing its work, the signals by which it opens and closes orders. over time beginners understand by what criteria their advisor opens new positions. and then beginners will already understand whether he wants to trade with ea or manualy.
and you twist my words!! i didn’t say i don’t follow market analysis at all. i said i don't do it fully.
and i repeat 100 times more that ea needs to be updated. of course if you don't do it you'll lose sooner or later.
so think before you write any nonsense, dear!

MP_89 posted:
you'll lose sooner or later.

Prest posted:

MP_89 posted:
and this is being told to me by a prehistoric man who, i suppose, still cannot believe all these "new technologies" and draws a market chart by hand.

Now I'll tell you a little about you. You probably lost your money so many times that you decided that the only way to earn it was not to participate, so you transferred this responsibility to an advisor. hah 😉

Samuelkoi posted:

Prest posted:

MP_89 posted:
and this is being told to me by a prehistoric man who, i suppose, still cannot believe all these "new technologies" and draws a market chart by hand.

Now I'll tell you a little about you. You probably lost your money so many times that you decided that the only way to earn it was not to participate, so you transferred this responsibility to an advisor. hah 😉

I'm glad that you have the same opinion as me. It seems to me that this person is simply out of touch with the reality of trading or wants to sell his ea.

MP_89 posted:

Samuelkoi posted:

MP_89 posted:

i think trade with ea helps the beginners better understand the market. and it’s quite good trading experience.

you asks me about arguments.
i'll tell you most important argument for ea. huge time savings.
1. i dont fully researching the current market situation, i dont make forecasts, etc. the advisor does all this for me.
2. i dont need to stay awake for days and monitor the minimum oscilation of each pips.
3. i get a constant profit.
want more arguments? trade with ea at least once. then you'll understand.

Oh, and how dos using EA help newcomer understand the market without trading?
It's not at all necessary to constantly be near the terminal to trade. You can take long-term trading as a basis, instead of nervous scalping.
In the first point, you say that you don't follow the market analysis. And wha will happen if a trend ea gets into a flat correction and you will not be near the terminal to turn it off?

ea'll help beginners by analyzing its work, the signals by which it opens and closes orders. over time beginners understand by what criteria their advisor opens new positions. and then beginners will already understand whether he wants to trade with ea or manualy.
and you twist my words!! i didn’t say i don’t follow market analysis at all. i said i don't do it fully.
and i repeat 100 times more that ea needs to be updated. of course if you don't do it you'll lose sooner or later.
so think before you write any nonsense, dear!

Prest posted:

MP_89 posted:
and this is being told to me by a prehistoric man who, i suppose, still cannot believe all these "new technologies" and draws a market chart by hand. Richi dear don't make me laugh. 😁😁😁
what can someone like you know about artificial intelligence or the work of advisors?

Hey, what can you know about me? Your conclusions are hasty due to the lack of arguments. The advisor cannot be a full substitute for manual trading in the market, which is directly dependent on the humans behavior.

I may accept the fact that advisors can be used, but only if you want to lose all your funds.

Prest posted:

MP_89 posted:
and this is being told to me by a prehistoric man who, i suppose, still cannot believe all these "new technologies" and draws a market chart by hand.

Now I'll tell you a little about you. You probably lost your money so many times that you decided that the only way to earn it was not to participate, so you transferred this responsibility to an advisor. hah 😉

Prest posted:

I don't deny that advisors using can be justified. But only if this advisor is made by the trader(user). But this trader must have extensive experience in manual trading + be able to program advisors. This is a fairly extensive knowledge. But I repeat, this does not remove all the responsibility.

Akalay posted:
What is best broker to trade with EA then? Do you know any?

Samuelkoi posted:

MP_89 posted:
ea'll help beginners by analyzing its work, the signals by which it opens and closes orders. over time beginners understand by what criteria their advisor opens new positions. and then beginners will already understand whether he wants to trade with ea or manualy.
and you twist my words!! i didn’t say i don’t follow market analysis at all. i said i don't do it fully.
and i repeat 100 times more that ea needs to be updated. of course if you don't do it you'll lose sooner or later.
so think before you write any nonsense, dear!

I have never met anyone who could learn to trade by analyzing the trade of ea. This is a freakish teaching in my opinion.
You don't follow all the time, but the market can change any minute, just as you step away from your pc.

You correctly said only one phrase during the posting:

MP_89 posted:
you'll lose sooner or later.

Paul_Neewt posted:
<>

SLK Fintech EA >>> Profit + 12000% Max drawndown 7%

Akalay posted:

MP_89 posted:

Samuelkoi posted:

MP_89 posted:

i think trade with ea helps the beginners better understand the market. and it’s quite good trading experience.

you asks me about arguments.
i'll tell you most important argument for ea. huge time savings.
1. i dont fully researching the current market situation, i dont make forecasts, etc. the advisor does all this for me.
2. i dont need to stay awake for days and monitor the minimum oscilation of each pips.
3. i get a constant profit.
want more arguments? trade with ea at least once. then you'll understand.

Oh, and how dos using EA help newcomer understand the market without trading?
It's not at all necessary to constantly be near the terminal to trade. You can take long-term trading as a basis, instead of nervous scalping.
In the first point, you say that you don't follow the market analysis. And wha will happen if a trend ea gets into a flat correction and you will not be near the terminal to turn it off?

ea'll help beginners by analyzing its work, the signals by which it opens and closes orders. over time beginners understand by what criteria their advisor opens new positions. and then beginners will already understand whether he wants to trade with ea or manualy.
and you twist my words!! i didn’t say i don’t follow market analysis at all. i said i don't do it fully.
and i repeat 100 times more that ea needs to be updated. of course if you don't do it you'll lose sooner or later.
so think before you write any nonsense, dear!

What is best broker to trade with EA then? Do you know any?