Forex Growth Bot
Прибыль : | +2644.71% |
Просадка | 94.46% |
Пипс: | 8075.5 |
Сделки | 2881 |
Выигрыш: |
|
Потери: |
|
Тип: | Реальный |
Кредитное плечо: | 1:200 |
Трейдинг: | Автоматически |
Edit Your Comment
Forex Growth Bot Обсуждение
Участник с Dec 20, 2010
107 комментариев
Jan 09, 2011 at 19:13
Участник с Dec 20, 2010
107 комментариев
No , that's fine, it won't interfere with the robot controls. Only if you close down MT4 completely.
Участник с Sep 29, 2010
40 комментариев
Jan 09, 2011 at 19:15
Участник с Sep 29, 2010
40 комментариев
fxgrowthbot posted:
No , that's fine, it won't interfere with the robot controls. Only if you close down MT4 completely.
Many thanks :)
Участник с Dec 06, 2010
13 комментариев
Jan 10, 2011 at 14:36
Участник с Dec 06, 2010
13 комментариев
Hi can you help, i am thinking of getting your robot, can i use it on FXCM its a 6 digit broker?
Do i need to change any settings?
Can this be used on only one MT4 account?
I have other questions
Do you have a skype acct or your support team on skype? That i can call on to get help setting this robot up on
thanks in advance
Do i need to change any settings?
Can this be used on only one MT4 account?
I have other questions
Do you have a skype acct or your support team on skype? That i can call on to get help setting this robot up on
thanks in advance
Участник с Nov 26, 2010
125 комментариев
Jan 10, 2011 at 16:15
Участник с Nov 26, 2010
125 комментариев
fxgrowthbot,
I wrote into support but didn't hear from them. If I want to run in the same account with 2 sets of settings will the trades conflict?
Lets say I run 1 set of trades on 1 chart at default. Then run another chart with slightly tweaked settings or even a different timeframe. Will this confuse the EA? I don't see any way to enter a magic number so that this might not be possible.
I wrote into support but didn't hear from them. If I want to run in the same account with 2 sets of settings will the trades conflict?
Lets say I run 1 set of trades on 1 chart at default. Then run another chart with slightly tweaked settings or even a different timeframe. Will this confuse the EA? I don't see any way to enter a magic number so that this might not be possible.
Участник с Sep 29, 2010
40 комментариев
Jan 10, 2011 at 21:29
Участник с Sep 29, 2010
40 комментариев
Hi forexgrothbot
Do i have to apply the FGB custom indicator to my chart or is there for the EA to use when it makes a trade?
Thanks
Graham
Do i have to apply the FGB custom indicator to my chart or is there for the EA to use when it makes a trade?
Thanks
Graham
Участник с Sep 29, 2010
40 комментариев
Jan 10, 2011 at 21:35
Участник с Sep 29, 2010
40 комментариев
rayong1 posted:
fxgrowthbot,
I wrote into support but didn't hear from them. If I want to run in the same account with 2 sets of settings will the trades conflict?
Lets say I run 1 set of trades on 1 chart at default. Then run another chart with slightly tweaked settings or even a different timeframe. Will this confuse the EA? I don't see any way to enter a magic number so that this might not be possible.
Hi Raymond
I have a tweaked version of the EA which allows me to set up MAGIC numbers for each chart.
I have a live account here: https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/forex-growth-bot/75835 which I set up today (no trades a yet)
I have 3 charts with basic setting except for the Volatility Factor. I have them set to 2.0, 2.5 & 3.0 respectvely
You are welcome to monitor the results if you like :)
Happy trading
Graham
Участник с Dec 20, 2010
107 комментариев
Jan 10, 2011 at 22:49
Участник с Dec 20, 2010
107 комментариев
You don't need to apply the indicator.
Raymond I believe we responded to your e-mail.
Raymond I believe we responded to your e-mail.
Участник с Dec 20, 2010
107 комментариев
Jan 10, 2011 at 22:50
Участник с Dec 20, 2010
107 комментариев
Axlk, yes it will work with your broker and it's locked to your PC.
We do have skype support but typically it's part of our advanced support package.
We do have skype support but typically it's part of our advanced support package.
Участник с Jul 27, 2010
32 комментариев
Jan 11, 2011 at 06:40
Участник с Jul 27, 2010
32 комментариев
fxgrowthbot,
Which broker, what version of Ea and what EA settings your are using for the results shown on this website ?
Also do you manually ever handle the tardes for this account ?
I am askng because the results are much better on this website than the account 1151607 on Thinkforex broker.
Thanks
Which broker, what version of Ea and what EA settings your are using for the results shown on this website ?
Also do you manually ever handle the tardes for this account ?
I am askng because the results are much better on this website than the account 1151607 on Thinkforex broker.
Thanks
Участник с Nov 26, 2010
2 комментариев
Jan 11, 2011 at 14:43
Участник с Nov 26, 2010
2 комментариев
I don't have idea why should hide the forex broker here... suspicious.
Участник с Dec 20, 2010
107 комментариев
Jan 11, 2011 at 16:00
Участник с Dec 20, 2010
107 комментариев
Hi Joe, are you referring to the statement on the website? on top ?
Участник с Dec 12, 2010
3 комментариев
Jan 12, 2011 at 00:35
Участник с Dec 12, 2010
3 комментариев
Locked to a PC = is it possible to change this "lock", in case I change e.g. VPS to a different provider?
Участник с Dec 20, 2010
107 комментариев
Участник с Dec 20, 2010
107 комментариев
Jan 12, 2011 at 05:14
Участник с Dec 20, 2010
107 комментариев
The broker.. is shown in info.. it's not hidden.
Участник с Dec 30, 2010
15 комментариев
Jan 12, 2011 at 10:29
Участник с Dec 30, 2010
15 комментариев
Has anyone gotten any trades this week with FGB?? Just curious. Mine hasn't taken any trades but its been a bit consolidated.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Участник с Nov 15, 2010
106 комментариев
Jan 12, 2011 at 10:29
Участник с Nov 15, 2010
106 комментариев
The broker is shown on his web site on the statement, but its hidden here at Myfx Book for what ever reasons.
Участник с Dec 30, 2010
15 комментариев
Jan 12, 2011 at 11:19
Участник с Dec 30, 2010
15 комментариев
MPierson posted:
Has anyone gotten any trades this week with FGB?? Just curious. Mine hasn't taken any trades but its been a bit consolidated.
Thanks.
OOOPS... never mind. No sooner said than trade taken :-)
Участник с May 10, 2010
360 комментариев
Jan 12, 2011 at 12:18
Участник с May 10, 2010
360 комментариев
This guy brings it to the point....😎
http://www.forexpeacearmy.com/public/review/www.forexgrowthbot.com
http://www.forexpeacearmy.com/public/review/www.forexgrowthbot.com
Участник с Aug 22, 2009
52 комментариев
Jan 12, 2011 at 12:32
Участник с Aug 22, 2009
52 комментариев
FXGrowthbot,
This is that post on Forexpeacearmy.Can you please comment on it ?
Thank you
No Rating
Date of Post: 2011-01-09
Review: Ok looks good doesn't it, now time for reality FOLKS!
Go to their website and download the 8year Strategy tester report!
What do you see well I'll tell you:
From 13/02/02 to 05/04/02 there are 32 losers on in a Row Ouch!!
From 28/01/02 to 09/05/02 there is a running DD of 45.8%.
I hear people saying ok these things happen so what it made a nice profit after the 8yrs and continues to do so on the live statement RIGHT well WRONG!
Let's look at something here shall we.
Firstly yes 2002 was a long time ago but it counts remember the rule what has happened in the past can happen again PERIOD that's why we back test RIGHT!
Secondly take a close look at the lot size on that back test its 0.1 ($1) against a $2500 starting balance, and the current live statement is using 0.05 (50c) against a $250 starting balance that's 5 times bigger, because if they had deposited $2500 on the live statement 10 x $250 that 0.05 lot would be 0.5 ($5) 10 times more, are with me so far?
So now let's look at that 45.8% DD again based on the current lot size against balance on the live statement that would be 5 x higher 229% which makes the system this EA uses on current lot size untradeable, so those results are not a true reflection of a realistic return over a long period, to make it a tradable EA those lot sizes should be set 5 times LOWER @ 0.01 (10c) against the $250 balance and hence the returns are suddenly not so impressive!!
Over the 8yrs the returns average out @ around 16% per month with a running DD of 45.8% and don't forget the 32 losers in a row I don't think those stats are very impressive do you??
Sorry to be a party pooper but I'm sick of these sites claiming they are selling a Rolls Royce and providing a Mini yes they both get you from a to b but if you choose to drive the Rolls it will run out of Petrol before you reach your final destination more than once as well!!
And remember to maintain the monthly % returns you have to compound your lot sizes (increase them against your balance) so that 229% DD will always be a risk, even with the right lot size a 45.8% DD is quite a high risk to make a miserable 16% a month, in my opinion anyway!
This is that post on Forexpeacearmy.Can you please comment on it ?
Thank you
No Rating
Date of Post: 2011-01-09
Review: Ok looks good doesn't it, now time for reality FOLKS!
Go to their website and download the 8year Strategy tester report!
What do you see well I'll tell you:
From 13/02/02 to 05/04/02 there are 32 losers on in a Row Ouch!!
From 28/01/02 to 09/05/02 there is a running DD of 45.8%.
I hear people saying ok these things happen so what it made a nice profit after the 8yrs and continues to do so on the live statement RIGHT well WRONG!
Let's look at something here shall we.
Firstly yes 2002 was a long time ago but it counts remember the rule what has happened in the past can happen again PERIOD that's why we back test RIGHT!
Secondly take a close look at the lot size on that back test its 0.1 ($1) against a $2500 starting balance, and the current live statement is using 0.05 (50c) against a $250 starting balance that's 5 times bigger, because if they had deposited $2500 on the live statement 10 x $250 that 0.05 lot would be 0.5 ($5) 10 times more, are with me so far?
So now let's look at that 45.8% DD again based on the current lot size against balance on the live statement that would be 5 x higher 229% which makes the system this EA uses on current lot size untradeable, so those results are not a true reflection of a realistic return over a long period, to make it a tradable EA those lot sizes should be set 5 times LOWER @ 0.01 (10c) against the $250 balance and hence the returns are suddenly not so impressive!!
Over the 8yrs the returns average out @ around 16% per month with a running DD of 45.8% and don't forget the 32 losers in a row I don't think those stats are very impressive do you??
Sorry to be a party pooper but I'm sick of these sites claiming they are selling a Rolls Royce and providing a Mini yes they both get you from a to b but if you choose to drive the Rolls it will run out of Petrol before you reach your final destination more than once as well!!
And remember to maintain the monthly % returns you have to compound your lot sizes (increase them against your balance) so that 229% DD will always be a risk, even with the right lot size a 45.8% DD is quite a high risk to make a miserable 16% a month, in my opinion anyway!
Участник с Nov 26, 2010
125 комментариев
Jan 12, 2011 at 17:07
Участник с Nov 26, 2010
125 комментариев
MPierson posted:
MPierson posted:
Has anyone gotten any trades this week with FGB?? Just curious. Mine hasn't taken any trades but its been a bit consolidated.
Thanks.
OOOPS... never mind. No sooner said than trade taken :-)
I got the same 3 trades open this week and almost the exact same 3 losses on FX Pro as on the account here. For some reason FX Primus only made 2 of those trades.
I'm still optimistic. These are just the first trades. After it draws down 10% of my account I'll start getting concerned.

*Коммерческое использование и спам не допускаются и могут привести к аннулированию аккаунта.
Совет: Размещенные изображения или ссылки на Youtube автоматически вставляются в ваше сообщение!
Совет: введите знак @ для автоматического заполнения имени пользователя, участвующего в этом обсуждении.