Forex Growth Bot
Прибыль : | +2644.71% |
Просадка | 94.46% |
Пипс: | 8075.5 |
Сделки | 2881 |
Выигрыш: |
|
Потери: |
|
Тип: | Реальный |
Кредитное плечо: | 1:200 |
Трейдинг: | Автоматически |
Edit Your Comment
Forex Growth Bot Обсуждение
Участник с Mar 04, 2011
286 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 03:44
Участник с Mar 04, 2011
286 комментариев
daily_martingle posted:
there is no need to hedge ur trade. i dont know why FGB developers are not clever enough. look at this link i am using FGB too. but the result is so much better. becouse i am using it in a difffrent way.
https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/way-to-win/110327
in fact i am using another EA's on this account too. but the result on EURUSD in belong to FGB.68% won on this pair.
after every trade i am deleting the SL. and if the market was in profit i will use trailing stop 20 or 25.
but when the market goes in the opposite way i use manual martingle system , at least 100 pip step.
in this way i will never get cought.
its good to some EA use martingle system to avoid losses.
<b>but when the market goes in the opposite way i use manual martingle system , at least 100 pip step.<\/b>
Can you write this in detail ?
so every other can use FGB in more better way..
thanks
forex_trader_12567
Участник с May 29, 2010
276 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 04:27
Участник с May 29, 2010
276 комментариев
daily_martingle posted:
there is no need to hedge ur trade. i dont know why FGB developers are not clever enough. look at this link i am using FGB too. but the result is so much better. becouse i am using it in a difffrent way.
https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/way-to-win/110327
in fact i am using another EA's on this account too. but the result on EURUSD in belong to FGB.68% won on this pair.
after every trade i am deleting the SL. and if the market was in profit i will use trailing stop 20 or 25.
but when the market goes in the opposite way i use manual martingle system , at least 100 pip step.
in this way i will never get cought.
its good to some EA use martingle system to avoid losses.
hmm.. nice strategy, good for you who still able do manual dude. may be i should take a time for that. is there anyone know how to make any e-mail or alert to e-mail after FGB open the trade? so, i can monitor it better, and try this strategy.
forex_trader_34364
Участник с Apr 18, 2011
239 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 05:07
Участник с Apr 18, 2011
239 комментариев
Pakfx posted:
daily_martingle posted:
there is no need to hedge ur trade. i dont know why FGB developers are not clever enough. look at this link i am using FGB too. but the result is so much better. becouse i am using it in a difffrent way.
https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/way-to-win/110327
in fact i am using another EA's on this account too. but the result on EURUSD in belong to FGB.68% won on this pair.
after every trade i am deleting the SL. and if the market was in profit i will use trailing stop 20 or 25.
but when the market goes in the opposite way i use manual martingle system , at least 100 pip step.
in this way i will never get cought.
its good to some EA use martingle system to avoid losses.
<b>but when the market goes in the opposite way i use manual martingle system , at least 100 pip step.<\/b>
Can you write this in detail ?
so every other can use FGB in more better way..
thanks
its so simple. for example: FGB opened sell position on 26.05.2011 15:00 , at price 1.4099. at firs we shoul turn on the assige pt and Sl in FGB setting. in this way we can see the take profit and stop loss price. i am deleting the stop loss and if the trade opened on 0.01 lot i put a sell limit order 100 pips above the FGB order with 0.02 lots (1.4199) . after that i will modify the TP.
in this case we need at least 300 $ main deposit. in martingle systems we cant use large Lot. but we always have profit.
take a look and monitor this martingle system. u will undrestand waht am i trying to say.
https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/wallstreet-forex-robot/117841
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 12:52
(отредактировано Jun 03, 2011 at 12:54)
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
daily_martingle posted:
Pakfx posted:
daily_martingle posted:
there is no need to hedge ur trade. i dont know why FGB developers are not clever enough. look at this link i am using FGB too. but the result is so much better. becouse i am using it in a difffrent way.
https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/way-to-win/110327
in fact i am using another EA's on this account too. but the result on EURUSD in belong to FGB.68% won on this pair.
after every trade i am deleting the SL. and if the market was in profit i will use trailing stop 20 or 25.
but when the market goes in the opposite way i use manual martingle system , at least 100 pip step.
in this way i will never get cought.
its good to some EA use martingle system to avoid losses.
<b>but when the market goes in the opposite way i use manual martingle system , at least 100 pip step.<\/b>
Can you write this in detail ?
so every other can use FGB in more better way..
thanks
its so simple. for example: FGB opened sell position on 26.05.2011 15:00 , at price 1.4099. at firs we shoul turn on the assige pt and Sl in FGB setting. in this way we can see the take profit and stop loss price. i am deleting the stop loss and if the trade opened on 0.01 lot i put a sell limit order 100 pips above the FGB order with 0.02 lots (1.4199) . after that i will modify the TP.
in this case we need at least 300 $ main deposit. in martingle systems we cant use large Lot. but we always have profit.
take a look and monitor this martingle system. u will undrestand waht am i trying to say.
https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/wallstreet-forex-robot/117841
Martingale system is too dangerous.
I think use a martingale strategy together with stop loss could be a middleway less dangerous solution.
For example kangaroo ea use something similar:
cover bad positions with martingale (max 6 and fixedsize (not increased lost size)) and always set a stop loss limit like 20% of account for each group of positions. So in the worst badly situation you don't burst your account but have just a 20% loss.
Something like this would need to be implemented and tested.
forex_trader_34364
Участник с Apr 18, 2011
239 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 17:00
Участник с Apr 18, 2011
239 комментариев
prototipo posted:
daily_martingle posted:
Pakfx posted:
daily_martingle posted:yes u r right. it is danger but i dont have enough time to calculate
Martingale system is too dangerous.
I think use a martingale strategy together with stop loss could be a middleway less dangerous solution.
For example kangaroo ea use something similar:
cover bad positions with martingale (max 6 and fixedsize (not increased lost size)) and always set a stop loss limit like 20% of account for each group of positions. So in the worst badly situation you don't burst your account but have just a 20% loss.
Something like this would need to be implemented and tested.
if the trader uses safe lots for every trade it will be safe.
FGB always trades in the correct direction of the trend. the problem is low SL, 30 or 40 pips. thats why it losses lots of trades.
the developers must work more on this problem, if they do this EA would be the best in the world
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 17:11
(отредактировано Jun 03, 2011 at 17:21)
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
.
Участник с Mar 04, 2011
286 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 17:15
Участник с Mar 04, 2011
286 комментариев
daily_martingle posted:
prototipo posted:
daily_martingle posted:
Pakfx posted:
daily_martingle posted:yes u r right. it is danger but i dont have enough time to calculate
Martingale system is too dangerous.
I think use a martingale strategy together with stop loss could be a middleway less dangerous solution.
For example kangaroo ea use something similar:
cover bad positions with martingale (max 6 and fixedsize (not increased lost size)) and always set a stop loss limit like 20% of account for each group of positions. So in the worst badly situation you don't burst your account but have just a 20% loss.
Something like this would need to be implemented and tested.
if the trader uses safe lots for every trade it will be safe.
FGB always trades in the correct direction of the trend. the problem is low SL, 30 or 40 pips. thats why it losses lots of trades.
the developers must work more on this problem, if they do this EA would be the best in the world
yes your right till then its better to have n eye on every trade. and use proper sl tp and trailling stop setting.. one have to test the best tp sl and trail stop for FGB if we find any thing good the will make it the best.
any way its correct it opens all the order in correct direction.. if we the EA simply put the sl in entry position that can also prevent loss. or we can try it with other EA ..
I will try to contact any programer that can make this i hope this will help preventing the loss.
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 17:20
(отредактировано Jun 03, 2011 at 17:25)
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
I backtested the FGB EA from 2004 to now. The result is about 9000% gain.
The backtest confirm the drawdown of may (it means that backtest match with live and it's realiable)
My opinion is that FGB is programmed on the medium trend power history data, and now the power of each trend is quite lower than the history. I think soon the EurUsd will get to normal behaviour and EA will start profit again.
My advice to everybody is to use a good money management, accept this drawdown and wait EA start profit again (it will) without change strategy. The backtest says that the strategy is already the best strategy.
The main difference between a good trader and a loser one is that a good trader use proper money management, accept the drawdown and trust in the good strategy waiting profit. The loser everytime meet a drawdown doesn't accept the pain, think the strategy's not working and change it or throw it away after a few days.
My advice is:
WAIT
BE PATIENT
ACCEPT THE PAIN OF THE DRAWDOWN
EVERYTIME YOU FEEL A PAIN DUE TO THE DRAWDOWN, OPEN THE STRATEGY TESTER AND ENJOY WITH IT
The backtest confirm the drawdown of may (it means that backtest match with live and it's realiable)
My opinion is that FGB is programmed on the medium trend power history data, and now the power of each trend is quite lower than the history. I think soon the EurUsd will get to normal behaviour and EA will start profit again.
My advice to everybody is to use a good money management, accept this drawdown and wait EA start profit again (it will) without change strategy. The backtest says that the strategy is already the best strategy.
The main difference between a good trader and a loser one is that a good trader use proper money management, accept the drawdown and trust in the good strategy waiting profit. The loser everytime meet a drawdown doesn't accept the pain, think the strategy's not working and change it or throw it away after a few days.
My advice is:
WAIT
BE PATIENT
ACCEPT THE PAIN OF THE DRAWDOWN
EVERYTIME YOU FEEL A PAIN DUE TO THE DRAWDOWN, OPEN THE STRATEGY TESTER AND ENJOY WITH IT
Участник с Jan 25, 2010
13 комментариев
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 18:57
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
250 pips profit on my account
I closed the positions manually, they were alreasdy near to the profit, I thought it didn't worth to risk the overweek for 50 more pips
I closed the positions manually, they were alreasdy near to the profit, I thought it didn't worth to risk the overweek for 50 more pips
Участник с Feb 18, 2011
17 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 19:05
Участник с Feb 18, 2011
17 комментариев
prototipo posted:
daily_martingle posted:
Pakfx posted:
daily_martingle posted:
there is no need to hedge ur trade. i dont know why FGB developers are not clever enough. look at this link i am using FGB too. but the result is so much better. becouse i am using it in a difffrent way.
https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/way-to-win/110327
in fact i am using another EA's on this account too. but the result on EURUSD in belong to FGB.68% won on this pair.
after every trade i am deleting the SL. and if the market was in profit i will use trailing stop 20 or 25.
but when the market goes in the opposite way i use manual martingle system , at least 100 pip step.
in this way i will never get cought.
its good to some EA use martingle system to avoid losses.
<b>but when the market goes in the opposite way i use manual martingle system , at least 100 pip step.<\/b>
Can you write this in detail ?
so every other can use FGB in more better way..
thanks
its so simple. for example: FGB opened sell position on 26.05.2011 15:00 , at price 1.4099. at firs we shoul turn on the assige pt and Sl in FGB setting. in this way we can see the take profit and stop loss price. i am deleting the stop loss and if the trade opened on 0.01 lot i put a sell limit order 100 pips above the FGB order with 0.02 lots (1.4199) . after that i will modify the TP.
in this case we need at least 300 $ main deposit. in martingle systems we cant use large Lot. but we always have profit.
take a look and monitor this martingle system. u will undrestand waht am i trying to say.
https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/wallstreet-forex-robot/117841
Martingale system is too dangerous.
I think use a martingale strategy together with stop loss could be a middleway less dangerous solution.
For example kangaroo ea use something similar:
cover bad positions with martingale (max 6 and fixedsize (not increased lost size)) and always set a stop loss limit like 20% of account for each group of positions. So in the worst badly situation you don't burst your account but have just a 20% loss.
Something like this would need to be implemented and tested.
Kangaroo is Kangaroo...
Участник с Feb 18, 2011
17 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 19:17
Участник с Feb 18, 2011
17 комментариев
prototipo posted:
I backtested the FGB EA from 2004 to now. The result is about 9000% gain.
The backtest confirm the drawdown of may (it means that backtest match with live and it's realiable)
My opinion is that FGB is programmed on the medium trend power history data, and now the power of each trend is quite lower than the history. I think soon the EurUsd will get to normal behaviour and EA will start profit again.
My advice to everybody is to use a good money management, accept this drawdown and wait EA start profit again (it will) without change strategy. The backtest says that the strategy is already the best strategy.
The main difference between a good trader and a loser one is that a good trader use proper money management, accept the drawdown and trust in the good strategy waiting profit. The loser everytime meet a drawdown doesn't accept the pain, think the strategy's not working and change it or throw it away after a few days.
My advice is:
WAIT
BE PATIENT
ACCEPT THE PAIN OF THE DRAWDOWN
EVERYTIME YOU FEEL A PAIN DUE TO THE DRAWDOWN, OPEN THE STRATEGY TESTER AND ENJOY WITH IT
Thank you for this wonderful comment.
You are quite right. I have changed the strategy by adding a Trailing Stop EA. This is a temporary measure until my optimization ends (23 days left zzz). When I get my ideal set I will return to the original strategy. By now I got better results than the reference account.
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 19:20
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
earquake posted:
prototipo posted:
daily_martingle posted:
Pakfx posted:
daily_martingle posted:
there is no need to hedge ur trade. i dont know why FGB developers are not clever enough. look at this link i am using FGB too. but the result is so much better. becouse i am using it in a difffrent way.
https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/way-to-win/110327
in fact i am using another EA's on this account too. but the result on EURUSD in belong to FGB.68% won on this pair.
after every trade i am deleting the SL. and if the market was in profit i will use trailing stop 20 or 25.
but when the market goes in the opposite way i use manual martingle system , at least 100 pip step.
in this way i will never get cought.
its good to some EA use martingle system to avoid losses.
<b>but when the market goes in the opposite way i use manual martingle system , at least 100 pip step.<\/b>
Can you write this in detail ?
so every other can use FGB in more better way..
thanks
its so simple. for example: FGB opened sell position on 26.05.2011 15:00 , at price 1.4099. at firs we shoul turn on the assige pt and Sl in FGB setting. in this way we can see the take profit and stop loss price. i am deleting the stop loss and if the trade opened on 0.01 lot i put a sell limit order 100 pips above the FGB order with 0.02 lots (1.4199) . after that i will modify the TP.
in this case we need at least 300 $ main deposit. in martingle systems we cant use large Lot. but we always have profit.
take a look and monitor this martingle system. u will undrestand waht am i trying to say.
https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/wallstreet-forex-robot/117841
Martingale system is too dangerous.
I think use a martingale strategy together with stop loss could be a middleway less dangerous solution.
For example kangaroo ea use something similar:
cover bad positions with martingale (max 6 and fixedsize (not increased lost size)) and always set a stop loss limit like 20% of account for each group of positions. So in the worst badly situation you don't burst your account but have just a 20% loss.
Something like this would need to be implemented and tested.
Kangaroo is Kangaroo...
absolutely, Ozzie and Dutch are the best
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 19:21
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
earquake posted:
prototipo posted:
I backtested the FGB EA from 2004 to now. The result is about 9000% gain.
The backtest confirm the drawdown of may (it means that backtest match with live and it's realiable)
My opinion is that FGB is programmed on the medium trend power history data, and now the power of each trend is quite lower than the history. I think soon the EurUsd will get to normal behaviour and EA will start profit again.
My advice to everybody is to use a good money management, accept this drawdown and wait EA start profit again (it will) without change strategy. The backtest says that the strategy is already the best strategy.
The main difference between a good trader and a loser one is that a good trader use proper money management, accept the drawdown and trust in the good strategy waiting profit. The loser everytime meet a drawdown doesn't accept the pain, think the strategy's not working and change it or throw it away after a few days.
My advice is:
WAIT
BE PATIENT
ACCEPT THE PAIN OF THE DRAWDOWN
EVERYTIME YOU FEEL A PAIN DUE TO THE DRAWDOWN, OPEN THE STRATEGY TESTER AND ENJOY WITH IT
Thank you for this wonderful comment.
You are quite right. I have changed the strategy by adding a Trailing Stop EA. This is a temporary measure until my optimization ends (23 days left zzz). When I get my ideal set I will return to the original strategy. By now I got better results than the reference account.
Don't understand
Why 23 days?
Участник с Feb 18, 2011
17 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 19:22
Участник с Feb 18, 2011
17 комментариев
I certify that these parameters make FGB compatible with Trailing Stop EAs.
InternalControl = false
ManualTradeControl = true
InternalControl = false
ManualTradeControl = true
Участник с Feb 18, 2011
17 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 19:26
Участник с Feb 18, 2011
17 комментариев
prototipo posted:
Don't understand
Why 23 days?
It's the time until optimization ends...
Участник с Oct 01, 2010
27 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 19:31
Участник с Oct 01, 2010
27 комментариев
YES...and while the strategy stester is open already...try 9,69,1.7 instead of 5,60,2
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 20:01
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
in may, I have a smaller drawdown (about 5% less)
from 2004 to now I have a bigger profit (about 30% more)
from 2004 to now I have a bigger profit (about 30% more)
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
Jun 03, 2011 at 20:36
Участник с Jul 21, 2010
119 комментариев
prototipo posted:
It's a Very good setting
ehm... analyzing better the test result I see that your settings give a bigger drawdown from 2004 to now, but bigger profit, basically it's a more aggressive setting
*Коммерческое использование и спам не допускаются и могут привести к аннулированию аккаунта.
Совет: Размещенные изображения или ссылки на Youtube автоматически вставляются в ваше сообщение!
Совет: введите знак @ для автоматического заполнения имени пользователя, участвующего в этом обсуждении.