FXStabilizerAUD - Durable

Пользователь удалил эту систему.

FXStabilizerAUD - Durable Обсуждение

Apr 07, 2013 at 22:58
3,905 Просмотры
49 Replies
Участник с May 20, 2016   28 комментариев
Jul 09, 2016 at 19:37
fx_skill posted:
choilun123 posted:
HI,

I'd like to ask about the EA, it have had different orders from backtest to real account. what is the detection for open order?
Is it real safe when differ from BT?
I may put large capital for durable mode and use 100% auto risk when the risk is real calculated.

Regards,

Adrian

Results of backtest is depends on quality of quotes. Bad history data can be even with 99% modelling quality. It's depends on history gaps. We don't saw difference of real trading from backtesting results but it's possible. Any way live trading is more important and it has more relevance. The main thing, that all our customers have the same results as we are have at our live account. FXStabilizer uses indicator to detect when trend already safe for system and EA open the trade.

Please for more information and more quick response contact us here: [email protected]



Thanks for ur replies.
Anyway, I have one additional question. In case the market's volatility is being rapid, the spread has much larger than normal (over 100 pips) Maybe on 2008 Oct. etc. This would touch the SL and blow the account as seem like very tight on the last martigale. Do yours recommend to use Fixed spread account instead of flowing one? Thanks for reply again.

Adrian
forex_trader_76137
Участник с May 03, 2012   59 комментариев
Jul 17, 2016 at 13:21
choilun123 posted:
fx_skill posted:
choilun123 posted:
HI,

I'd like to ask about the EA, it have had different orders from backtest to real account. what is the detection for open order?
Is it real safe when differ from BT?
I may put large capital for durable mode and use 100% auto risk when the risk is real calculated.

Regards,

Adrian

Results of backtest is depends on quality of quotes. Bad history data can be even with 99% modelling quality. It's depends on history gaps. We don't saw difference of real trading from backtesting results but it's possible. Any way live trading is more important and it has more relevance. The main thing, that all our customers have the same results as we are have at our live account. FXStabilizer uses indicator to detect when trend already safe for system and EA open the trade.

Please for more information and more quick response contact us here: [email protected]



Thanks for ur replies.
Anyway, I have one additional question. In case the market's volatility is being rapid, the spread has much larger than normal (over 100 pips) Maybe on 2008 Oct. etc. This would touch the SL and blow the account as seem like very tight on the last martigale. Do yours recommend to use Fixed spread account instead of flowing one? Thanks for reply again.

Adrian


Yes, we prefer to use fixed spread. On our real account we have 3 pips spread at AUDUSD (at many brokers it could be 2 pips) and we have good results. But it works well with floating spread too. For all the time we have no bad feedbacks from customers with floating spread.
Участник с May 20, 2016   28 комментариев
Jul 31, 2016 at 06:48
Hi Vendor,

Just test with 5-digit broker @ 10pips (1pip in 4-digit) on Oct 2008. There is a differ in 6th Oct and blow up the martingale. If change the spread to 20pips (same as yours test), that is as same as yours. So very confused about yours EA wether in trap with accuracy mistake. Pls notice that matter. Thanks.

BR,
Adrian
forex_trader_76137
Участник с May 03, 2012   59 комментариев
Aug 03, 2016 at 22:31
choilun123 posted:
Hi Vendor,

Just test with 5-digit broker @ 10pips (1pip in 4-digit) on Oct 2008. There is a differ in 6th Oct and blow up the martingale. If change the spread to 20pips (same as yours test), that is as same as yours. So very confused about yours EA wether in trap with accuracy mistake. Pls notice that matter. Thanks.

BR,
Adrian

Hello Adrian,
Thank you for this information. Please send us this backtest to our support: [email protected] . Also it's needs to be checked quotes for gaps (price holes) at that period on visualization mode. Possibly it's just a bad quality of history quotes. Any way we will solve the problem if it takes place.
Участник с Dec 15, 2016   4 комментариев
Dec 18, 2016 at 08:55
the EA does not work anymore?
why?
Участник с May 20, 2016   28 комментариев
Dec 23, 2016 at 12:37
so soon to blow up...so disappointed
Участник с Nov 06, 2015   91 комментариев
Dec 23, 2016 at 21:14
Well, it was almost 5 years. But martingales always blow up.

However the robot is so good that if you put it in tubo mode you may recover in three months.
Участник с May 04, 2012   1608 комментариев
Dec 24, 2016 at 18:24 (отредактировано Dec 24, 2016 at 18:25)
One day's losses have wiped out ALL profits since April 15, 2015...

20 months' gains are gone in a flash...

The only problem with Maringales is not IF, but WHEN such things happen...
Участник с Mar 23, 2017   3 комментариев
Dec 31, 2017 at 11:05
Shall we use cent account with turbo mode?
Участник с Jan 14, 2023   1 комментариев
Jan 23, 2023 at 03:45
Hi Fx_Skill,

How are you? Is there a way to make this EA bot comply with US FIFO rule? Thanks!
Basically, FIFO doesn't allow US broker to sell or buy the same lot size until first order is closed.

For example,

Order #1 Sell 0.01 lot - OK
Order #2 Sell 0.01 lot - Not allow

Order #1 Sell 0.01 lot - Ok
Order #2 Buy 0.01 lot - OK
Order #3 Sell 0.01 lot - OK

Regards,
Tom
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*Коммерческое использование и спам не допускаются и могут привести к аннулированию аккаунта.
Совет: Размещенные изображения или ссылки на Youtube автоматически вставляются в ваше сообщение!
Совет: введите знак @ для автоматического заполнения имени пользователя, участвующего в этом обсуждении.