sPhantom Auto Trader (By sPhantom)
Прибыль : | +694.0% |
Просадка | 91.94% |
Пипс: | 1266.4 |
Сделки | 261 |
Выигрыш: |
|
Потери: |
|
Тип: | Реальный |
Кредитное плечо: | 1:400 |
Трейдинг: | Автоматически |
Edit Your Comment
sPhantom Auto Trader Обсуждение
Участник с Nov 22, 2010
12 комментариев
Apr 16, 2014 at 20:08
Участник с Nov 22, 2010
12 комментариев
to all guys who are criticizing sphantom, i agree with you all but i need an explanation for 2013 results that what made me pay 300$ for this crap.😡
Участник с May 08, 2012
316 комментариев
Apr 16, 2014 at 21:54
Участник с May 08, 2012
316 комментариев
beko posted:
to all guys who are criticizing sphantom, i agree with you all but i need an explanation for 2013 results that what made me pay 300$ for this crap.😡
The markets have changed. What once worked, does not now. It may again, it may tomorrow, but it hasn't the past couple months. I traded Forex Envy for the last two years and made a ton of money. Recently, its broken. You just have to watch them, or trade them with reduced capital until things again change.
You need to be on a never ending systems quest. Reviewing, testing, watching. Thats' the price of glory.
War is when your government tells you who the enemy is. Revolution is when you figure out, for yourself, who the enemy is.
Участник с Sep 20, 2013
36 комментариев
Apr 17, 2014 at 02:06
Участник с Sep 20, 2013
36 комментариев
beko posted:
to all guys who are criticizing sphantom, i agree with you all but i need an explanation for 2013 results that what made me pay 300$ for this crap.😡
Somebody said a 99% quality backtest from 2007 on is the minimum industry standard nowadays for commercial EA's.
Участник с Feb 21, 2014
16 комментариев
Apr 17, 2014 at 06:38
Участник с Feb 21, 2014
16 комментариев
jiang posted:beko posted:
to all guys who are criticizing sphantom, i agree with you all but i need an explanation for 2013 results that what made me pay 300$ for this crap.😡
Somebody said a 99% quality backtest from 2007 on is the minimum industry standard nowadays for commercial EA's.
this is still not good enough to confirms that the EA can work in the future...
you can be good with years of backtest and finally lost everything just because the market moves in the wrong direction at the wrong time...
Участник с Jun 03, 2013
79 комментариев
Apr 17, 2014 at 06:49
Участник с Jun 03, 2013
79 комментариев
Lucky I stop this EA after first DD, at least not blow my account.
Участник с Aug 25, 2011
2 комментариев
Apr 23, 2014 at 06:16
Участник с Aug 25, 2011
2 комментариев
sphantom could be a great EA if you control all opened position. Price action, levels and 2 additional grid steps - that's all what you need for success.
Участник с Sep 21, 2013
81 комментариев
Apr 23, 2014 at 07:45
Участник с Sep 21, 2013
81 комментариев
kazinik posted:
sphantom could be a great EA if you control all opened position. Price action, levels and 2 additional grid steps - that's all what you need for success.
lol dont suggest high drawdown EAs
Участник с Aug 30, 2013
280 комментариев
Apr 25, 2014 at 00:00
Участник с Aug 30, 2013
280 комментариев
Large profits always look good Arya but if you looked very carefully you would have seen this guy opened orders at the start with 100% of his equity in his similar to the sphantom except using bigger risk, the difference he was lucky enough to survive also he started without using SL but started using SL after he made lots of profits which means he's lowering risk. Issue is you want to join when his luck ran out as can be seen from his latest results where his SL is causing big losses.
So in conclusion the sphantom risked 30% all the way where he started with 100% risk but he had better performance obviously due to manual trading where he was able to get quickly get out sometimes with profits and other time with small losses, as apposed to using an EA.
So in conclusion the sphantom risked 30% all the way where he started with 100% risk but he had better performance obviously due to manual trading where he was able to get quickly get out sometimes with profits and other time with small losses, as apposed to using an EA.
Участник с Sep 21, 2013
81 комментариев
Apr 25, 2014 at 04:33
Участник с Sep 21, 2013
81 комментариев
btw, forexpipcatcha is talking about johnpaul77 service, not fxhunter.
Участник с Nov 22, 2010
12 комментариев
Apr 27, 2014 at 21:05
Участник с Nov 22, 2010
12 комментариев
keep going sphantom, i know that i'm gonna make a lot of profit using you then i'm gonna loose it again in one trade :)
Участник с Jun 03, 2013
79 комментариев
Apr 28, 2014 at 13:53
Участник с Jun 03, 2013
79 комментариев
Hi ! I am going to sell this licenses and get some money back. Please PM me the price that you want. Thanks.
Участник с Nov 13, 2010
44 комментариев
May 07, 2014 at 17:52
Участник с Nov 13, 2010
44 комментариев
On every trade, you have to keep in mind that you'll either make a few pips or blow your account. That's how these no/huge stoploss EAs work.
Участник с Aug 30, 2013
280 комментариев
May 07, 2014 at 22:13
Участник с Aug 30, 2013
280 комментариев
not on every trade for this EA but on the second trade in this case lol
Участник с May 08, 2012
316 комментариев
May 08, 2014 at 03:29
Участник с May 08, 2012
316 комментариев
Michigander posted:beko posted:
to all guys who are criticizing sphantom, i agree with you all but i need an explanation for 2013 results that what made me pay 300$ for this crap.😡
The markets have changed. What once worked, does not now. It may again, it may tomorrow, but it hasn't the past couple months. I traded Forex Envy for the last two years and made a ton of money. Recently, its broken. You just have to watch them, or trade them with reduced capital until things again change.
You need to be on a never ending systems quest. Reviewing, testing, watching. Thats' the price of glory.
Michigander Retard: i envy your skill to do that. Markets change daily, so far as I can tell. I have a prescient guru who can make you millions for $100/month!!! What the hell does that mean that markets change? markets do not change, they go up and down, always!!! what we do is chase them! love you man!!!
War is when your government tells you who the enemy is. Revolution is when you figure out, for yourself, who the enemy is.
Участник с Mar 17, 2013
9 комментариев
May 08, 2014 at 04:24
Участник с Mar 17, 2013
9 комментариев
funny video,, that's all
Участник с Apr 20, 2013
160 комментариев
May 08, 2014 at 17:59
Участник с Apr 20, 2013
160 комментариев
hahhah that video was funny
Участник с Nov 13, 2010
44 комментариев
May 10, 2014 at 13:06
Участник с Nov 13, 2010
44 комментариев
Take a look at my account, very good steady result. Message me if want to know how.

forex_trader_190541
Участник с May 15, 2014
3 комментариев
May 15, 2014 at 10:00
Участник с May 15, 2014
3 комментариев
@bkforex quite a short history, isnt it?
Участник с Nov 05, 2013
7 комментариев
May 16, 2014 at 14:08
Участник с Nov 05, 2013
7 комментариев
I have to cringe.. Many people bagged those who forewarned the great prosperity of Sphantom even for those ones to ridiculously suggest that they may be remotely closely related to Fxpapa. Sure enough here lies the bottom of the pit.. Those who invested then compounded are now gone.. Those who used this as a supplement trade may have survived.. When they reappear under a new name which they will, you will see the same type of people defend their very narrow time frame profits only due to their heavy personal investments which these bunnies will lose to these people again.You will also see the Samaritans of this world suggest some reality to this type of productt.... Wise up mob..! If it's to good to be true..then it is!
Участник с Dec 31, 2012
97 комментариев
May 16, 2014 at 15:55
Участник с Dec 31, 2012
97 комментариев
Wow, there are still people on this board?? After that last SL I thought everyone took off.
BLTW777@

*Коммерческое использование и спам не допускаются и могут привести к аннулированию аккаунта.
Совет: Размещенные изображения или ссылки на Youtube автоматически вставляются в ваше сообщение!
Совет: введите знак @ для автоматического заполнения имени пользователя, участвующего в этом обсуждении.