Advertisement
My dilemma
forex_trader_139412
会员从Jul 16, 2013开始
352帖子
Nov 23, 2015 at 14:56
As I have pointed out in another thread (which blocked me)
I have stopped pursuing this as it only looked good, trading without stops. Once or twice a bad trade was taken, a worse trade than 10 year backtests revealed, and because there was no stop it just carried on going south until hitting mc or being closed manually..
I wish someone had pointed out to me then that "straight line" EAs look good, but eventually bites you in the backside..
I have stopped pursuing this as it only looked good, trading without stops. Once or twice a bad trade was taken, a worse trade than 10 year backtests revealed, and because there was no stop it just carried on going south until hitting mc or being closed manually..
I wish someone had pointed out to me then that "straight line" EAs look good, but eventually bites you in the backside..
forex_trader_149646
会员从Sep 09, 2013开始
406帖子
Nov 26, 2015 at 07:58
RSTrading posted:
I wish someone had pointed out to me then that "straight line" EAs look good, but eventually bites you in the backside..
Should be obvious RST. Straight lines often use poor R:R to achieve just that.
Risk 1000 Pips to earn 2 pips, you'll get many winners before that loser comes( also 1000 pip move would take normally a few months to take place.). In theory, if you can achieve 500 New scalps to offset that 1 loser, you could essentially recover, but adding another position changes your money management structure unless you already built it in when deciding your first lotsize.
forex_trader_139412
会员从Jul 16, 2013开始
352帖子
Nov 26, 2015 at 08:17
Yes, in hindsight.. It was pretty dumb..
*商业用途和垃圾邮件将不被容忍，并可能导致账户终止。
提示：发布图片/YouTube网址会自动嵌入到您的帖子中！
提示：键入@符号，自动完成参与此讨论的用户名。
