Show your profitable account here.

togr posted:

unlimitedgainsfx posted:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/unlimitedgainsfx/profits/2440906

@unlimitedgainsfx
You had already made ONE trade. OH so much congratulations ;)

20 trades made actually, and yes Thank you.

Canlove posted:
Check it out https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Canlove/canlove/2431834

Did you crash your whole balance in the last week of January?

vzografos posted:

togr posted:


Who is bigger fool :)

Actually I think you already answered that question.
But ok. You seem to believe that it is a great strategy and no matter what numbers people show you that it is too risk, you are obviously convinced otherwise. Fair enough!.

If you are so certain about the stability of his system why dont you invest a few thousand with him and then you can have great returns too.

I dont need to invest to his system as I posses my own profitable system which I trust
My point was that strategy is better then many others posted here

unlimitedgainsfx posted:

togr posted:

unlimitedgainsfx posted:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/unlimitedgainsfx/profits/2440906

@unlimitedgainsfx
You had already made ONE trade. OH so much congratulations ;)

20 trades made actually, and yes Thank you.

with TWO days of trading history ... you just HAD to jump on a hot thread without even bother to read what it was all about ..

*slow clap*

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Hulan/smart/2442879

togr posted:

vzografos posted:

togr posted:


Who is bigger fool :)

Actually I think you already answered that question.
But ok. You seem to believe that it is a great strategy and no matter what numbers people show you that it is too risk, you are obviously convinced otherwise. Fair enough!.

If you are so certain about the stability of his system why dont you invest a few thousand with him and then you can have great returns too.

I dont need to invest to his system as I posses my own profitable system which I trust
My point was that strategy is better then many others posted here

Maybe you should consider investing with some trader as the systems that you have are nothing more than very average. The best strategy out of 30 you have posted is not much better than the average strategy posted on this thread. Besides, you use mostly brokers that are a joke and no serious trader would use. If I were you, I would focus more on trading than posting on this forum. Looks like you spend too much time here instead of trying to improve your average trading skills. Cheers mate

ronin75 posted:

unlimitedgainsfx posted:

togr posted:

unlimitedgainsfx posted:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/unlimitedgainsfx/profits/2440906

@unlimitedgainsfx
You had already made ONE trade. OH so much congratulations ;)

20 trades made actually, and yes Thank you.

with TWO days of trading history ... you just HAD to jump on a hot thread without even bother to read what it was all about ..

*slow clap*

I am sorry if you found my post not suitable for this thread.

System:
https://www.myfxbook.com/strategies/ai-capital/138433

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/arpan366/pps-eventstrategy/2419114 (broker error in Nov17)
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/arpan366/icm-mr-daily/2419110
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/arpan366/pps-harmonics/2419112

I don't get why Traders are posting accounts with bigger average losses than winning trades,do they not understand the basics of trading/money management?

snapdragon1970 posted:
I don't get why Traders are posting accounts with bigger average losses than winning trades,do they not understand the basics of trading/money management?

Average loss vs avg winning trade is not really important if other aspects of money management are respected. If you think thats the only aspect of money management then your view of it is very simplistic. There are plenty long term profitable accounts which, by your logic, should already be wiped out long time ago.

snapdragon1970 posted:
I don't get why Traders are posting accounts with bigger average losses than winning trades,do they not understand the basics of trading/money management?

Are you talking about any specific system?

In general, if you have a win rate of 70% and a average loss/average win of 1.5:1, you expectancy is 0.7*0.67 - 0.3*1 = 0.17R, which is positive, quite decent for a system and doesn't invalidate any money/risk management principles.

In addition, it does not break any rules specified by the OP, so i guess its ok to post here?

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/slayeraeb/asian-scalper-pamm/1975703


Trying to be consistent and profitable for two years

Adribaasmet posted:

vzografos posted:

fxsc1lper posted:
this is my account with 300 % profit and 6 % drawdown

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/fxsc1lper/super-strategy/2437626

I mean its ok although only limited history.
However what I dont really like is the fact that you started with 100 and 0.01 lots (thats 1:10 leverage which is a bit too much for my taste). Now at least with 300 or so balance you are at 1:3 with 0.01.

Still the pips are pretty decent so far. Of course due to the moderately high leverage it could have gone the opposite way. I cannot judge that due to the limited history as I said. Hope it works for you in the future. Best of luck

I don’t know why most of the attached accounts are very recent! I am looking for a long time successful account (minimum 2 years).

working on that minimum.

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/slayeraeb/asian-scalper-pamm/1975703/FW5f8MAKrUJMHkNczhxp

sheshwan posted:

snapdragon1970 posted:
I don't get why Traders are posting accounts with bigger average losses than winning trades,do they not understand the basics of trading/money management?

Average loss vs avg winning trade is not really important if other aspects of money management are respected. If you think thats the only aspect of money management then your view of it is very simplistic. There are plenty long term profitable accounts which, by your logic, should already be wiped out long time ago.

Why don't you share with us what other money management systems would be of benefit,since my view is simplistic in your view.

sheshwan posted:

togr posted:

vzografos posted:

togr posted:


Who is bigger fool :)

Actually I think you already answered that question.
But ok. You seem to believe that it is a great strategy and no matter what numbers people show you that it is too risk, you are obviously convinced otherwise. Fair enough!.

If you are so certain about the stability of his system why dont you invest a few thousand with him and then you can have great returns too.

I dont need to invest to his system as I posses my own profitable system which I trust
My point was that strategy is better then many others posted here

Maybe you should consider investing with some trader as the systems that you have are nothing more than very average. The best strategy out of 30 you have posted is not much better than the average strategy posted on this thread. Besides, you use mostly brokers that are a joke and no serious trader would use. If I were you, I would focus more on trading than posting on this forum. Looks like you spend too much time here instead of trying to improve your average trading skills. Cheers mate

Says the guy with no system connected haha

snapdragon1970 posted:

sheshwan posted:

snapdragon1970 posted:
I don't get why Traders are posting accounts with bigger average losses than winning trades,do they not understand the basics of trading/money management?

Average loss vs avg winning trade is not really important if other aspects of money management are respected. If you think thats the only aspect of money management then your view of it is very simplistic. There are plenty long term profitable accounts which, by your logic, should already be wiped out long time ago.

Why don't you share with us what other money management systems would be of benefit,since my view is simplistic in your view.

Its not my job to do that. I think you can manage to do it yourself. Its simple, just how you like it😀

slayeraeb2 posted:

Adribaasmet posted:

vzografos posted:

fxsc1lper posted:
this is my account with 300 % profit and 6 % drawdown

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/fxsc1lper/super-strategy/2437626

I mean its ok although only limited history.
However what I dont really like is the fact that you started with 100 and 0.01 lots (thats 1:10 leverage which is a bit too much for my taste). Now at least with 300 or so balance you are at 1:3 with 0.01.

Still the pips are pretty decent so far. Of course due to the moderately high leverage it could have gone the opposite way. I cannot judge that due to the limited history as I said. Hope it works for you in the future. Best of luck

I don’t know why most of the attached accounts are very recent! I am looking for a long time successful account (minimum 2 years).

working on that minimum.

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/slayeraeb/asian-scalper-pamm/1975703/FW5f8MAKrUJMHkNczhxp

That’s really amazing! Such a long history! Really I impressed.

snapdragon1970 posted:

sheshwan posted:

snapdragon1970 posted:
I don't get why Traders are posting accounts with bigger average losses than winning trades,do they not understand the basics of trading/money management?

Average loss vs avg winning trade is not really important if other aspects of money management are respected. If you think thats the only aspect of money management then your view of it is very simplistic. There are plenty long term profitable accounts which, by your logic, should already be wiped out long time ago.

Why don't you share with us what other money management systems would be of benefit,since my view is simplistic in your view.

I am not here to promote anything so I will not post any particular account. But with 2min of quick searching through Systems and I found 5 systems with 2 year+ trading history on regulated brokers that have average loss at least 2x higher than avg win. And thats going just through the first couple of pages of the list not even looking at all the systems that popped up. I looked maybe at 10 systems that were on the list and on the list there were 17!! pages that passed my filter. So what do you say about that? Will you still claim that avg win vs avg loss is the most important aspect of MM? 😁