Edit Your Comment
how does myfxbook calculate drawdown?
会员从Nov 21, 2011开始
1601帖子
Jun 04, 2014 at 09:24
会员从Nov 21, 2011开始
1601帖子
Drawdown is calculated from peak-to-valley based on both equity and balance, since inception.
Drawdown can only increase.
Formula should be something like that:
If (Equity < 0 and Equity/Balance*100 > Actual Drawdown) => So Drawdown is updated with the new value.
Drawdown can only increase.
Formula should be something like that:
If (Equity < 0 and Equity/Balance*100 > Actual Drawdown) => So Drawdown is updated with the new value.
会员从Nov 21, 2011开始
1601帖子

forex_trader_28881
会员从Feb 07, 2011开始
691帖子
Jun 04, 2014 at 11:43
会员从Feb 07, 2011开始
691帖子
And it's also completely in-accurate. MT thing. Industry thing apparently....
DD should be current equity vs highest equity, or lowest vs highest equity.
However, they have a second method which is more correct. The DD tab. It's different to how DD is calculated in the systems main page, you'll see the figure is different. I use that one, more accurate.
DD should be current equity vs highest equity, or lowest vs highest equity.
However, they have a second method which is more correct. The DD tab. It's different to how DD is calculated in the systems main page, you'll see the figure is different. I use that one, more accurate.

forex_trader_28881
会员从Feb 07, 2011开始
691帖子
Jun 05, 2014 at 05:07
(已编辑 Jun 05, 2014 at 05:10)
会员从Feb 07, 2011开始
691帖子
Calculation 1:
Highest Balance - Equity
Calculation 2 I think is:
Highest Equity - Current Equity.
You'd have look at their blog to see what it really is.
http://blog.myfxbook.com/2012/02/20/equity-based-drawdown-new-metrics/
Highest Balance - Equity
Calculation 2 I think is:
Highest Equity - Current Equity.
You'd have look at their blog to see what it really is.
http://blog.myfxbook.com/2012/02/20/equity-based-drawdown-new-metrics/
Jun 19, 2014 at 12:03
会员从Jun 09, 2011开始
183帖子
CrazyTrader posted:
Drawdown is calculated from peak-to-valley based on both equity and balance, since inception.
Drawdown can only increase.
Formula should be something like that:
If (Equity < 0 and Equity/Balance*100 > Actual Drawdown) => So Drawdown is updated with the new value.
Thanks for sharing man
http://www.freeforexrebates .info
Jun 27, 2014 at 21:12
会员从Jun 26, 2014开始
8帖子
DD = Max(balance(t) - equity(t)) / balance(t)
Go to: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/aatie/squatjumps5-account1/958093
you will see that t = 18 March 2014 and that Max(balance(t) - equity(t)) = 2250 and balance(t) = 11500
so the DD = 2250/11500 = 19.6
If you are looking for a conservative system, innovative ideas, take a look to the account above.
Go to: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/aatie/squatjumps5-account1/958093
you will see that t = 18 March 2014 and that Max(balance(t) - equity(t)) = 2250 and balance(t) = 11500
so the DD = 2250/11500 = 19.6
If you are looking for a conservative system, innovative ideas, take a look to the account above.
Creator of "Squat Jump" conservative Forex trading strategy
会员从Nov 21, 2011开始
1601帖子
Jun 28, 2014 at 09:22
会员从Jun 26, 2014开始
8帖子
CrazyTrader posted:aatie posted:
If you are looking for a conservative system, innovative ideas, take a look to the account above.
Hi,
I think you should tell us more about it.
Thank u for your interest.
Kindly find attached five documents that describe the strategy.
Creator of "Squat Jump" conservative Forex trading strategy
会员从Nov 21, 2011开始
1601帖子
会员从Jun 25, 2014开始
12帖子
Jun 28, 2014 at 21:04
会员从Jun 25, 2014开始
12帖子
Boys and Girls,
the most important thing is WHEN this drawdown is calculated. As we all know in the markets the movement within a one minute can be very large for example 100 ticks down and then in next 5 minutes 100 ticks back up.
Now if the DD calculation is done only at the end of the position you do not see the real drawdown of the system. The drawdown during the position.
-> during that 100 tick drop your account may be wiped out completely depending of course the level of the risk in the position
So what is the frequency when the DD is calculated here in myfxbook ?
the most important thing is WHEN this drawdown is calculated. As we all know in the markets the movement within a one minute can be very large for example 100 ticks down and then in next 5 minutes 100 ticks back up.
Now if the DD calculation is done only at the end of the position you do not see the real drawdown of the system. The drawdown during the position.
-> during that 100 tick drop your account may be wiped out completely depending of course the level of the risk in the position
So what is the frequency when the DD is calculated here in myfxbook ?
Go With The Flow
会员从Nov 21, 2011开始
1601帖子
Jun 28, 2014 at 23:51
会员从Nov 21, 2011开始
1601帖子
TickSeeker posted:
Boys and Girls,
the most important thing is WHEN this drawdown is calculated. As we all know in the markets the movement within a one minute can be very large for example 100 ticks down and then in next 5 minutes 100 ticks back up.
Now if the DD calculation is done only at the end of the position you do not see the real drawdown of the system. The drawdown during the position.
-> during that 100 tick drop your account may be wiped out completely depending of course the level of the risk in the position
So what is the frequency when the DD is calculated here in myfxbook ?
each tick!
会员从Jun 25, 2014开始
12帖子
Sep 25, 2014 at 07:14
会员从Aug 19, 2013开始
9帖子
I am not sure that the above statements are correct.
The way I am reading myfxbook's calculations, the Drawdown and Max Drawdowns are calculated on a CLOSED TRADES basis. It is not evaluating DD based on Equity. So if I am right, this method is highly favoring flawed grid and martingale systems which often carry heavy floating losses while only closing profitable trades... until they crash out. Take this logic to an extreme case, myfxbook's stats may not disclose a system's actual DD until equity hits margin call trigger and the account blows up.
For example, one of my systems carries some profitable trades for a long time with little drawdowns. Yet, it has been credited with a 20% maxDD based on closed trades only while Equity never ever pulled back by even a quarter of that.
This would make myfxbook's DD calculation and overall true system risk assessment highly unreliable.
The way I am reading myfxbook's calculations, the Drawdown and Max Drawdowns are calculated on a CLOSED TRADES basis. It is not evaluating DD based on Equity. So if I am right, this method is highly favoring flawed grid and martingale systems which often carry heavy floating losses while only closing profitable trades... until they crash out. Take this logic to an extreme case, myfxbook's stats may not disclose a system's actual DD until equity hits margin call trigger and the account blows up.
For example, one of my systems carries some profitable trades for a long time with little drawdowns. Yet, it has been credited with a 20% maxDD based on closed trades only while Equity never ever pulled back by even a quarter of that.
This would make myfxbook's DD calculation and overall true system risk assessment highly unreliable.
A Universal Algorithm. A Trading Edge in ANY Market.
会员从Jun 25, 2014开始
12帖子
Sep 25, 2014 at 20:42
会员从Jun 25, 2014开始
12帖子
esmfx1 posted:
Good point.
Curious to read the answers.
I thought this was done... but was not... this was a good lesson: You have to check EVERYTHING BY YOURSELF. DO NOT TRUST ANYBODY !!
Can someone from the staff of myfxbook.com tell us what is the situation in this topic ?
Where the system is calcuation the drawdowns exactly ?
How can we trust to the results from this whole web site if the DD is calculated by the wrong way ?
Go With The Flow

*商业用途和垃圾邮件将不被容忍,并可能导致账户终止。
提示:发布图片/YouTube网址会自动嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:键入@符号,自动完成参与此讨论的用户名。