CAD-Trader (由 ebnerfred)

该用户已经删除了这个系统。

CAD-Trader讨论

Mar 17, 2011 at 07:06
4,902浏览
53 Replies
会员从Jun 14, 2010开始   28帖子
Jun 16, 2011 at 17:18
Well I hit stop loss last night on my 15% risk settings :( I'm down 8% since inception a couple weeks ago.
With God, all things are possible!
会员从May 28, 2011开始   8帖子
Jun 16, 2011 at 21:15
216.121.6.245:443

12895

Ab166551

my acct just grows daily, no complaints here! ver 2.1 default settings, but 'Increase Lots' @ True.



会员从Sep 24, 2010开始   7帖子
Jun 16, 2011 at 22:35
Lets have your complete settings Buddfx to see where were going wrong
forex_trader_23106
会员从Nov 19, 2010开始   45帖子
Jun 16, 2011 at 22:40
Caution: If MM = False and you choose your own lotsize, then it appears SecuritySL is not in effect. i.e. it will not close your losing positions at desired % loss.
I currently have 8 open sell positions on and earlier today was -25% open drawdown on account balance and all positions are still open. This is with a setting of 20% SecuritySL.
会员从May 28, 2011开始   8帖子
Jun 16, 2011 at 22:56
pips 11
MM true
lot size .01
maxspread 8
win per trade 12
risk 4.5
securitySL 50
increase lots true
number of trades 3
increase factor 1.5

ok now i remember i changed 'number of trades' to 3 and 'increase lots' to true, that's it. -hope this helps
会员从Jan 29, 2011开始   18帖子
Jun 19, 2011 at 04:16

sgibbs2000 posted:
    Caution: If MM = False and you choose your own lotsize, then it appears SecuritySL is not in effect. i.e. it will not close your losing positions at desired % loss.
I currently have 8 open sell positions on and earlier today was -25% open drawdown on account balance and all positions are still open. This is with a setting of 20% SecuritySL.

If you have MM = false, then also SecuritySL should work. It does for my account.
会员从Jan 29, 2011开始   18帖子
Jun 20, 2011 at 07:38

sgibbs2000 posted:
    Yes I run the old version. True it technically is not a hedge until there is 2 open trades going in opposite directions.
However, US brokers consider it a hedge just by placing opposite orders at the same time on the same pair and therefore automantically cancel one side the of the trade. Thus only leaving either a buy limit or a sell limit. The new US regs also did away with bracket trading for news breakouts, ect. since those types of trades had 2 pending orders on the same pair as well.

If there was a way to make the limit orders internal like you mentioned above, I believe this would make the EA US compliant.
That would be great.

Thanks ebnerfred.
I have a version now, that should work for MBTrading, because I hide the limit orders now.
Can you send a mail to [email protected] with your Plimus reference, that you got when you bought the EA, then I will send the version for MBT to you.
会员从May 28, 2011开始   8帖子
Jun 29, 2011 at 05:05
my acct still going strong!!! i think im ready to move up to mini acct and make $1000 deposit
rob559
forex_trader_29148
会员从Feb 11, 2011开始   1916帖子
Jul 20, 2011 at 13:26 (已编辑 Jul 20, 2011 at 13:26)
any update on it?
会员从Sep 24, 2010开始   7帖子
Jul 20, 2011 at 13:33
demo account blown, and got a refund.
会员从Jun 17, 2011开始   11帖子
Aug 06, 2011 at 12:53
the ea is disabled why?
会员从Jan 29, 2011开始   18帖子
Aug 07, 2011 at 16:47
the ea is disabled at the moment because of the unclear marktet conditions
forex_trader_16044
会员从Jul 31, 2010开始   70帖子
Oct 04, 2011 at 18:33
Stop out!
Ohh, my god...
会员从Jun 17, 2011开始   11帖子
Oct 04, 2011 at 21:11
grid strategy without filters is a matter of months to a blow account
登录 / 注册 to comment
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*商业用途和垃圾邮件将不被容忍,并可能导致账户终止。
提示:发布图片/YouTube网址会自动嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:键入@符号,自动完成参与此讨论的用户名。