FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari (由 stevetrade)
该用户已经删除了这个系统。
Edit Your Comment
FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari讨论

forex_trader_7497
会员从Feb 20, 2010开始
50帖子
Feb 26, 2010 at 16:34
(已编辑 Feb 26, 2010 at 16:34)
会员从Feb 20, 2010开始
50帖子
pipst posted:
It doesn't look good when they keep swapping Fusion versions without notification, I agree. They would make themselves look a lot better if they talked/emailed their customers with their intentions and why they were doing it. Having said that it does say on the EA Lab section of their website (where Fusion is downloaded from) 'Important: The following FRWC Section is strictly experimental.' So as far as that goes nothing is set in stone.
Here is a link to my Demo of Fusion v1.1a. I made no changes to the ea whatsoever. Lots are 0.05 and Lots Risk Reductor is 5.0.
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/pipst/frwc-fusion-v11a-alpari-demo/18138
I am also running a test on LMD on its own with recommended settings and that is currently +4.09%.
There is certainly connection/disconnection issues when using a demo account which is a real pain and which also may be contributing to peoples differing results.
Lots Risk Reductor at 5.0 means that EACH position is going to risk 5% of your account. So let's say HiRIDER strategy 2 opens 10 positions for you simulataneously, then you are risking 50% of your account with just one HiRIDER strategy.
Feb 26, 2010 at 17:05
会员从Feb 18, 2010开始
4帖子
There are plenty of worrying swings as far as this ea is concerned and maybe that's just the very nature of it, I'm certainly no expert. I am just running it on demo for 30 days and if I am not happy with what I see after that, I will be requesting a refund. I probably wouldn't go live with the exact same settings that I have on demo anyway.
Feb 26, 2010 at 17:25
会员从Feb 25, 2010开始
4帖子
I have checked out your Trading account statements but they bare little relation to the live trading account posted on the FRWC website and even less relation to my Fusion trading account. I am just worried that no one is getting the right signals. I am running the Fusion with FXCM on a demo account, I have heard that sometimes demo accounts can sometimes give misleading result??
Feb 26, 2010 at 17:33
会员从Feb 26, 2010开始
4帖子
I have looked at the same results and agree with robint. If you compare your open trades with those currently displayed on FRWC's live web results, there is no comparison. Their current live trades, very different to yours, are showing a loss of $490.00 on trades set at 0.01. Convert that to your settings and you would be showing a very large loss right now. Add to that my demo account has little in common with either the live results or yours where I am running a FXCM demo as well and the confusin grows and grows.

forex_trader_7497
会员从Feb 20, 2010开始
50帖子
Feb 26, 2010 at 17:50
(已编辑 Feb 26, 2010 at 17:52)
会员从Feb 20, 2010开始
50帖子
EA will not open the same exact trades in different brokers. Even with the same brokers, it sometimes doesn't open the same trades. You could check this with any EA. Sometimes one person's EA open a trade and close with a loss, and sometimes another person has an open trade closing with profit. There's a lot of factors involved: spread, connectivity, reputation of brokers, etc.
会员从Feb 25, 2010开始
95帖子
Feb 27, 2010 at 00:00
会员从Feb 25, 2010开始
95帖子
eafinder posted:
Lots Risk Reductor at 5.0 means that EACH position is going to risk 5% of your account. So let's say HiRIDER strategy 2 opens 10 positions for you simulataneously, then you are risking 50% of your account with just one HiRIDER strategy.
Lots Risk Reductor is not the same as Maximum Risk per position. For one trade event which opens multiple positions, it reduces the next position's lot size by that factor.
Next position's lot size = Current position's lotsize - Current position's lotsize x Lots Risk Reductor/100
Useful when you cannot define a SL. Or for calculating the next position size when you do not, cannot, or can't bother to poll the leverage that the broker is providing.

forex_trader_7497
会员从Feb 20, 2010开始
50帖子
Feb 27, 2010 at 01:34
(已编辑 Feb 27, 2010 at 01:34)
会员从Feb 20, 2010开始
50帖子
Clearpaper posted:
eafinder posted:
Lots Risk Reductor at 5.0 means that EACH position is going to risk 5% of your account. So let's say HiRIDER strategy 2 opens 10 positions for you simulataneously, then you are risking 50% of your account with just one HiRIDER strategy.
Lots Risk Reductor is not the same as Maximum Risk per position. For one trade event which opens multiple positions, it reduces the next position's lot size by that factor.
Next position's lot size = Current position's lotsize - Current position's lotsize x Lots Risk Reductor/100
Useful when you cannot define a SL. Or for calculating the next position size when you do not, cannot, or can't bother to poll the leverage that the broker is providing.
Per the manual, it says the following:
LotsRiskReductor - defines the risk for Money Management system. For example, if you set LotsRiskReductor = 5, then EA will risk 5% of your available margin to open "a new position" and will calculate the lot size accordingly.
I don't think HiRIDER opening 10 trades is considered one trade event. I have put a limit to HiRIDER to 5 max trades prior to the disaster several days ago (I have since reduce it to a maximum of 2 now). I have put $10K money trading live with Fusion. UseMM = True, LotsRiskReductor = 1.5. My broker only accepts 0.1 minimum lot (mini account). Fusion opened 5 trades HiRIDER several days ago, each with 0.1 lot. This is risking 5 x 2.1% = 10% if the stop loss gets hit. Thankfully, it didn't hit the stop loss and yesterday it closed in 12 pips profit. What a dumb luck. If LotsRiskReductor works as you said, it won't open 5 trades around the same time, each with 0.1 lot since I have specified LotsRiskReductor = 1.5 (the default). Each HiRIDER trade is considered a separate event (separate "new position) even though it may be opened using the same strategy, around the same time and around similar price.
Fusion opened 3 trades Super Volcano for me yesterday around the same time with slightly different price point, each position also with 0.1 lot. This is definitely risking more than 1.5% of the equity in TOTAL for just one strategy. So I think SV opening 3 trades is considered a different position each time too.
To my experience, it looks like LotsRiskReductor is maximum risk per position.
Feb 27, 2010 at 02:09
会员从Feb 18, 2010开始
5帖子
Untill you guys discover or rediscover the beauty of EAless trading, you may probably keep complaining about things you cannot control. I keep wondering what the beauty of trading is with these EA's.
Trade manual people! That is when you begin to enjoy the monster called FOREX!!
Trade manual people! That is when you begin to enjoy the monster called FOREX!!
Dreams are Real When You Work Towards Them

forex_trader_7497
会员从Feb 20, 2010开始
50帖子
Feb 27, 2010 at 02:45
会员从Feb 20, 2010开始
50帖子
I've been enjoying manual trading and my main real account is still strictly manual.
But I must say EA and automated trading is really fun too. It has its own potential and limitation.
If you can combine several complementary EA (diversify and spread risk), reduce down the risk of each strategy to acceptable level and play with the MM, then there just may be a way to deliver a consistent performance and smooth equity curve every month. May not be that 100% that newbies are looking for, but 5-15% a month consistent profit / month is my target.
But I must say EA and automated trading is really fun too. It has its own potential and limitation.
If you can combine several complementary EA (diversify and spread risk), reduce down the risk of each strategy to acceptable level and play with the MM, then there just may be a way to deliver a consistent performance and smooth equity curve every month. May not be that 100% that newbies are looking for, but 5-15% a month consistent profit / month is my target.
会员从Aug 31, 2009开始
131帖子
Feb 27, 2010 at 03:04
(已编辑 Feb 27, 2010 at 03:06)
会员从Aug 31, 2009开始
131帖子
Chuks posted:
... I keep wondering what the beauty of trading is with these EA's.
Trade manual people! That is when you begin to enjoy the monster called FOREX!!
The beauty is that I'm profitably trading while I sleep, workout, go on a date, hang at the club, drink too much and fall out in the bathroom while upchucking in the toilet. (Ahhhh... Good Times) and NOT stuck in front of a screen staring at charts!!
It ain't easy being Cheesy!
Feb 27, 2010 at 07:09
会员从Feb 20, 2010开始
150帖子
Fulltime247 posted:
Chuks posted:
... I keep wondering what the beauty of trading is with these EA's.
Trade manual people! That is when you begin to enjoy the monster called FOREX!!
The beauty is that I'm profitably trading while I sleep, workout, go on a date, hang at the club, drink too much and fall out in the bathroom while upchucking in the toilet. (Ahhhh... Good Times) and NOT stuck in front of a screen staring at charts!!
You the man Fulltime! Ea's are the way to go. Manual trading drains your energy. The challenge is to develop EA's that are intelligent and can be aware of market conditions and developments that are at least obvious, such as we would be aware of them. Letting a trade go negative -600 pips is silly. Unfortunately we are in the early stages of EA complexity. Conservative settings are the way to begin trading with this collection of EAs.
Many thanks to the guys who are posting their demo and live accounts for us to analyze. I ask that anyone on demo please include as many currencies as possible so we can see how these EAs handle different currencies. I notice several guys are excluding the yen crosses. These crosses are massive money makers. Let's see how the Ea's handle these currencies.
P.S. does anyone have any idea what Euro/Yen, the best yen cross IMO is not traded? Pound Yen is a monster of volatility compared to Euro Yen.
Cheers
A strategy must significantly profit in a 10 year backtest to have a chance in Live trading - Mine Does!
会员从Feb 25, 2010开始
95帖子
Feb 27, 2010 at 09:25
(已编辑 Feb 27, 2010 at 09:54)
会员从Feb 25, 2010开始
95帖子
eafinder posted:
Per the manual, it says the following:
LotsRiskReductor - defines the risk for Money Management system. For example, if you set LotsRiskReductor = 5, then EA will risk 5% of your available margin to open "a new position" and will calculate the lot size accordingly.
I don't think HiRIDER opening 10 trades is considered one trade event. I have put a limit to HiRIDER to 5 max trades prior to the disaster several days ago (I have since reduce it to a maximum of 2 now). I have put $10K money trading live with Fusion. UseMM = True, LotsRiskReductor = 1.5. My broker only accepts 0.1 minimum lot (mini account). Fusion opened 5 trades HiRIDER several days ago, each with 0.1 lot. This is risking 5 x 2.1% = 10% if the stop loss gets hit. Thankfully, it didn't hit the stop loss and yesterday it closed in 12 pips profit. What a dumb luck. If LotsRiskReductor works as you said, it won't open 5 trades around the same time, each with 0.1 lot since I have specified LotsRiskReductor = 1.5 (the default). Each HiRIDER trade is considered a separate event (separate "new position) even though it may be opened using the same strategy, around the same time and around similar price.
Thanks for posting your obversations and tests, eafinder, and all the rest too, it really helps in understanding how this Fusion works.
I had one a/c set up with Fusion, starting equity $5k, Lots = 0.0, UseMM = True, LotsRiskReductor = 17.0 (very high). Fusion(HiRider s2) opened 10 trades with the lotsizing as such.
Recorded__.Reduction
Lot size____Factor
0.62
0.51______17.74
0.43______15.69
0.35______18.60
0.29______17.14
0.24______17.24
0.20______16.67
0.16______20.00
0.13______18.75
0.11______15.58
It did reduce the lot size. The reduction factor is not exactly 17 probably due to the price changes (affecting the margin -> x100 effect) as the trades are being placed. Or because the lot sizes couldn't have a 3rd decimel place.
Would like to have other people post their HiRider trades if using MM and post their LRR too, if possible. (Stop lurking and post, you wankers. ;) )
I reckon the difference in performance we had is due to me setting Lots=0.0 to enable the MM. Something the manual did not tell us to do. And I'm sure, like me, you might have found the manuals sorely lacking in instructions and explanations. Too simplistic, and in the case of LRR, simply wrong.
One thing I don't know is how the 1st trade's lot size is calculated. $5k balance, LRR=17, 1st trade is 0.62. Anyone understand why?
eafinder posted:
Fusion opened 3 trades Super Volcano for me yesterday around the same time with slightly different price point, each position also with 0.1 lot. This is definitely risking more than 1.5% of the equity in TOTAL for just one strategy. So I think SV opening 3 trades is considered a different position each time too.
One observation about Super Volcano is that without setting SL via pip or Maximum Risk, it closes only when the right trigger occurs. The Maximum Risk setting was taken out of the Super Volcano component of Fusion. I don't know why. I suppose it might have conflicted with the global MM setting and we're now left with the manual pip SL. Another thing about the standalone Super Volcano is that I don't think it calculates lotsizing. You have to define lotsize then maximum risk can be calculated from that.

forex_trader_7497
会员从Feb 20, 2010开始
50帖子
Feb 27, 2010 at 17:55
会员从Feb 20, 2010开始
50帖子
Clearpaper posted:
Thanks for posting your obversations and tests, eafinder, and all the rest too, it really helps in understanding how this Fusion works.
I had one a/c set up with Fusion, starting equity $5k, Lots = 0.0, UseMM = True, LotsRiskReductor = 17.0 (very high). Fusion(HiRider s2) opened 10 trades with the lotsizing as such.
Recorded__.Reduction
Lot size____Factor
0.62
0.51______17.74
0.43______15.69
0.35______18.60
0.29______17.14
0.24______17.24
0.20______16.67
0.16______20.00
0.13______18.75
0.11______15.58
It did reduce the lot size. The reduction factor is not exactly 17 probably due to the price changes (affecting the margin -> x100 effect) as the trades are being placed. Or because the lot sizes couldn't have a 3rd decimel place.
Would like to have other people post their HiRider trades if using MM and post their LRR too, if possible. (Stop lurking and post, you wankers. ;) )
I reckon the difference in performance we had is due to me setting Lots=0.0 to enable the MM. Something the manual did not tell us to do. And I'm sure, like me, you might have found the manuals sorely lacking in instructions and explanations. Too simplistic, and in the case of LRR, simply wrong.
One thing I don't know is how the 1st trade's lot size is calculated. $5k balance, LRR=17, 1st trade is 0.62. Anyone understand why?
Thanks for posting your trade too. Indeed we have a lot of things to understand to properly manage the risk well. I try to search google to find what LLR really means, so far not a good information. Most sites say LLR is the % risk of "available margin"
I also don't understand why it chooses 0.62 as the first lot in your case. If LRR 17 really means risking 17% of "available margin", then if your equity is fully at $5000 before HiRIDER opens the first lot, then taking into account 210 pips stop loss, the first lot size should be 0.40 (risking 17% of available margin if the stop loss gets hit). In subsequent lot size, the available margin shrinks by the amount of the first lot, and thus the second trade lot size should be smaller.
You are right I put lot size = 0.1, UseMM=true, LRR = 1.5, and all of my different strategy opens a position each at 0.1. My broker doesn't accept micro lot size.
One observation about Super Volcano is that without setting SL via pip or Maximum Risk, it closes only when the right trigger occurs. The Maximum Risk setting was taken out of the Super Volcano component of Fusion. I don't know why. I suppose it might have conflicted with the global MM setting and we're now left with the manual pip SL. Another thing about the standalone Super Volcano is that I don't think it calculates lotsizing. You have to define lotsize then maximum risk can be calculated from that.
Another thing to understand. I have asked FRWC customer support about the SV terms as well (Risk and MaximumDecreaseFactor), but the response is not really answering the question. I don't think the customer service really knows what it is thsemvles either.
会员从Feb 25, 2010开始
95帖子
Feb 27, 2010 at 20:46
(已编辑 Feb 27, 2010 at 20:47)
会员从Feb 14, 2010开始
16帖子
Maybe I am being overly simplistic here, but is it really so hard to just set it to MM off, .01 or .02 per $1,000 invested, and let it trade reasonably? If you do that, you dont have to know what LRR is (or, at the least, you can learn about it without haphazardly applying it to your accounts, ESPECIALLY if they are real-money ones). Fixed lots of .01-.02 per $1,000 of equity is safe and profitable trading.
会员从Feb 25, 2010开始
95帖子
Feb 27, 2010 at 21:47
会员从Feb 25, 2010开始
95帖子
Ah.... I finally worked it out. My brain is melting. You were right. LRR is what it is stated to be.
Equity = $5,000
Leverage = 1:100
Margin available to trade = $5,000 x 100 = $500,000
LRR = 17
Amt to use for next trade = $500,000 x 0.17 = $85,000
The trade is EURUSD, exchange rate at that point was 1.3614
Amount of EUR to buy = $85,000/1.3614 = EUR 62,435.73 = 0.62 lots
--------------
Next trade will be calculated from the remaining leveraged amount = $500,000 - $85,000 = $415,000
Amt to use for next trade = $415,000 x 0.17 = $70,550
Amount of EUR to buy = $70,550/1.3614 = EUR 51,825.46 = 0.51 lots
--------------
And so on....
--------------
I feel pretty,
Oh, so pretty,
I feel pretty and witty and bright!
And I pity
Any girl who isn't me tonight.
Ah... that's a weight off my chest. And no, I'm not a girl.
O--kay.... Had you not posted, I probably wouldn't have worked it out. On to other things. I notice that SL does not come into the picture at all in the calculations above.
Just thinking about it, LLR applies a very useful technique for managing lot sizing. However its name is a little misleading. You technically don't manage your risk whatsoever. If there's no SL, your risk is 100%.
It would be better called "% Margin Used For Next Position", simply to avoid all the confusion. I mean, seriously. Haha...
That said, one lesson learnt from this week's Super Volcano performance is to put a SL. And I believe one goal now is to determine how high/low a SL to put for Super Volcano to maximise the efficacy of Fusion as a whole.
Possibly another one is to figure out the triggering criteria for SuperVolcano, I suspect pipst's a/c didn't trigger the loss and subsequent win trades that steve's and a number of other people's did is because of slippage or latency. Super Volcano's trigger window seems quite small.
Equity = $5,000
Leverage = 1:100
Margin available to trade = $5,000 x 100 = $500,000
LRR = 17
Amt to use for next trade = $500,000 x 0.17 = $85,000
The trade is EURUSD, exchange rate at that point was 1.3614
Amount of EUR to buy = $85,000/1.3614 = EUR 62,435.73 = 0.62 lots
--------------
Next trade will be calculated from the remaining leveraged amount = $500,000 - $85,000 = $415,000
Amt to use for next trade = $415,000 x 0.17 = $70,550
Amount of EUR to buy = $70,550/1.3614 = EUR 51,825.46 = 0.51 lots
--------------
And so on....
--------------
I feel pretty,
Oh, so pretty,
I feel pretty and witty and bright!
And I pity
Any girl who isn't me tonight.
Ah... that's a weight off my chest. And no, I'm not a girl.
O--kay.... Had you not posted, I probably wouldn't have worked it out. On to other things. I notice that SL does not come into the picture at all in the calculations above.
Just thinking about it, LLR applies a very useful technique for managing lot sizing. However its name is a little misleading. You technically don't manage your risk whatsoever. If there's no SL, your risk is 100%.
It would be better called "% Margin Used For Next Position", simply to avoid all the confusion. I mean, seriously. Haha...
That said, one lesson learnt from this week's Super Volcano performance is to put a SL. And I believe one goal now is to determine how high/low a SL to put for Super Volcano to maximise the efficacy of Fusion as a whole.
Possibly another one is to figure out the triggering criteria for SuperVolcano, I suspect pipst's a/c didn't trigger the loss and subsequent win trades that steve's and a number of other people's did is because of slippage or latency. Super Volcano's trigger window seems quite small.
Feb 27, 2010 at 22:00
会员从Dec 28, 2009开始
54帖子
hey guys what r u talkin about? its not about consistent profit..its all about the cost of this big SHIT... u can find better systems on forexfactory for peanuts ..nada...
and for the other one...when im clubbin or f**in i aint thinkin of forex ..luckily... so nobody tells you you shld make profit every day...people who think they will get money just like that are wrong...dont worry so was I...it was a necessary ..we learn on mistakes..
and for the other one...when im clubbin or f**in i aint thinkin of forex ..luckily... so nobody tells you you shld make profit every day...people who think they will get money just like that are wrong...dont worry so was I...it was a necessary ..we learn on mistakes..

*商业用途和垃圾邮件将不被容忍,并可能导致账户终止。
提示:发布图片/YouTube网址会自动嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:键入@符号,自动完成参与此讨论的用户名。