NCM Conservative (由 icmfund)
该用户已经删除了这个系统。
NCM Conservative讨论
Feb 27, 2020 at 11:43
@marco_mmbiz We have tested several pairs with our EA and decided to stick with the GBPCAD pair only. So far it seems that we've made a good choice with this pair & strategy.
No pain no gain
Feb 28, 2020 at 10:51
marco_mmbiz posted:
Looks good. Can I ask, why you've only been using GBPCAD? I understand if someone is doing EURUSD, GBPUSD, USDZAR, USDJPY, and so on only, but GBPCAD only I see for the very first time.
They don't know ) NCM it reseller but not author of this EA .
Mar 09, 2020 at 23:10
I am interested in following your signal on Signal Start. I am puzzled by the this in your listing on Signal Start: "Only works with IC Markets". Is that correct? I can understand that if I subscribe on your website, I need an account at IC Markets, but it shouldn't matter if I go through Signal Start.
Mar 10, 2020 at 11:11
@aranciata That is correct. We tested several brokers and it was clear that IC Markets has by far the best spread in the Asian session. That is the reason we only allow IC Markets for our local copy service. However you can use any other broker at SignalStart but keep in mind that you can get significantly different results because of the different trading conditions.
Check out https://myfxbook.com/forex-broker-spreads for live spreads and see if your broker has better spreads than IC Markets at the Asian session.
Check out https://myfxbook.com/forex-broker-spreads for live spreads and see if your broker has better spreads than IC Markets at the Asian session.
No pain no gain
Mar 10, 2020 at 17:52
icmfund posted:
@aranciata That is correct. We tested several brokers and it was clear that IC Markets has by far the best spread in the Asian session. That is the reason we only allow IC Markets for our local copy service. However you can use any other broker at SignalStart but keep in mind that you can get significantly different results because of the different trading conditions.
Check out https://myfxbook.com/forex-broker-spreads for live spreads and see if your broker has better spreads than IC Markets at the Asian session.
I never heard back on your results from testing ATC Brokers "NON-US" broker spreads. By my discussions with Dave Manoukian, the GBPCAD spreads were frequently better than IC Markets
test the waters, before you dive in
Mar 17, 2020 at 09:18
icmfund posted:
We are still trading very cautiously with lowered risk until market gets back to normal. So far +3.27% gain in March and we still have 2 weeks of trading from this month.
Glad to see a signal provider considers clients' risk.
most providers just want to get more and more commission or subscription fee.
会员从Jan 09, 2020开始
2帖子
Mar 26, 2020 at 11:10
When I can use the free trial? You can know in advance?
Apr 01, 2020 at 18:43
@abbatoir82 Please subscribe to our list on our website and we will notify you in e-mail.
No pain no gain
会员从Jan 09, 2020开始
2帖子
Apr 07, 2020 at 14:23
Done
Apr 13, 2020 at 19:19
Today, the maximum drawdown has mysteriously changed from 15% to 12%. Any ideas why?
Also, ordering the trades which have resulted in the largest pip loss:
11.12.2018 22:00 11.13.2018 20:38 GBPCAD Sell 0.02 - - 1.70044 1.71815 -177.1 -26.83 22h 38m -5.12%
11.13.2018 09:55 11.13.2018 20:38 GBPCAD Sell 0.02 - - 1.70495 1.71816 -132.1 -20.07 10h 43m -4.04%
11.13.2018 13:22 11.13.2018 20:38 GBPCAD Sell 0.02 - - 1.70944 1.71808 -86.4 -13.18 7h 16m -2.76%
11.13.2018 14:33 11.13.2018 20:38 GBPCAD Sell 0.06 - - 1.71411 1.71805 -39.4 -18.26 6h 5m -3.93%
Now, look at the drawdown data for this period.
12th November: 2.3%. It's already evident on the little chart next to the trade data, that the maximal drawdown of the trade went higher than the final result of the trade (-5.12%). However, even with cumulated trades over the 24 hour period, we see a maximum drawdown of 2.3%, and mysteriously, no drawdown data whatsoever for the 13th November.
This has occurred multiple times, also on 31st March 2020 where a much higher drawdown than the <1% documented was achieved.
Simple mathematics and due diligence seems to indicate that drawdown data is not at all reflective of what is actually occurring.
Also, ordering the trades which have resulted in the largest pip loss:
11.12.2018 22:00 11.13.2018 20:38 GBPCAD Sell 0.02 - - 1.70044 1.71815 -177.1 -26.83 22h 38m -5.12%
11.13.2018 09:55 11.13.2018 20:38 GBPCAD Sell 0.02 - - 1.70495 1.71816 -132.1 -20.07 10h 43m -4.04%
11.13.2018 13:22 11.13.2018 20:38 GBPCAD Sell 0.02 - - 1.70944 1.71808 -86.4 -13.18 7h 16m -2.76%
11.13.2018 14:33 11.13.2018 20:38 GBPCAD Sell 0.06 - - 1.71411 1.71805 -39.4 -18.26 6h 5m -3.93%
Now, look at the drawdown data for this period.
12th November: 2.3%. It's already evident on the little chart next to the trade data, that the maximal drawdown of the trade went higher than the final result of the trade (-5.12%). However, even with cumulated trades over the 24 hour period, we see a maximum drawdown of 2.3%, and mysteriously, no drawdown data whatsoever for the 13th November.
This has occurred multiple times, also on 31st March 2020 where a much higher drawdown than the <1% documented was achieved.
Simple mathematics and due diligence seems to indicate that drawdown data is not at all reflective of what is actually occurring.
Apr 14, 2020 at 11:20
@extons
Since you are already discussing with Myfxbook about the strategy update frequency please be so kind and ask them why the DD changed before accusing us that we manipulated. How do you think we could change the maximum drawdown data on our will? What would we gain from changing 15% to 12%? Do you think there is any significant difference between the two values?
I don't understand your motivations. You already canceled your trial twice after a week. Now you are asking to try it free a third time but before you could expect an answer from us you send an unfriendly message on our forum. I sent you my answers to the rest of your questions in an email.
Alex
Since you are already discussing with Myfxbook about the strategy update frequency please be so kind and ask them why the DD changed before accusing us that we manipulated. How do you think we could change the maximum drawdown data on our will? What would we gain from changing 15% to 12%? Do you think there is any significant difference between the two values?
I don't understand your motivations. You already canceled your trial twice after a week. Now you are asking to try it free a third time but before you could expect an answer from us you send an unfriendly message on our forum. I sent you my answers to the rest of your questions in an email.
Alex
No pain no gain
Apr 15, 2020 at 05:55
Hi Alex,
Thanks for your reply. I couldn’t reply because you had blocked me. Please rest assured that I am not accusing you of manipulating any data at all. I am simply laying out the facts as they are, in an objective manner, and was trying to stimulate discussion about it to get an answer from somebody to account for these discrepancies.
There will be many others out there who also do their due diligence (why wouldn’t they, they’re essentially investing their own money in a system) but they don’t comment about it. In principle this looks like an excellent system with clear longevity and consistency, but when things such as drawdowns are hugely different to what is reported, alarm bells start to ring.
As I said, I am not accusing you of manipulating data. As a clearly proud system owner (rightly so, it looks like a great system), it would also help your cause if you understood these very objective and clearly documented concerns instead of becoming immediately defensive and ignoring the points which I have made.
I am not trying to be difficult or bring negative light onto the system, I’m just asking very, very reasonable questions. As an aside, I do thank you for the customer service that you have shown me with your quick replies and patient demeanour, so thank you.
Thanks for your reply. I couldn’t reply because you had blocked me. Please rest assured that I am not accusing you of manipulating any data at all. I am simply laying out the facts as they are, in an objective manner, and was trying to stimulate discussion about it to get an answer from somebody to account for these discrepancies.
There will be many others out there who also do their due diligence (why wouldn’t they, they’re essentially investing their own money in a system) but they don’t comment about it. In principle this looks like an excellent system with clear longevity and consistency, but when things such as drawdowns are hugely different to what is reported, alarm bells start to ring.
As I said, I am not accusing you of manipulating data. As a clearly proud system owner (rightly so, it looks like a great system), it would also help your cause if you understood these very objective and clearly documented concerns instead of becoming immediately defensive and ignoring the points which I have made.
I am not trying to be difficult or bring negative light onto the system, I’m just asking very, very reasonable questions. As an aside, I do thank you for the customer service that you have shown me with your quick replies and patient demeanour, so thank you.
