Thanks for your insightful comments on my highly profitable EA. My goal for this account was NOT to make 2% per month with zero draw-downs, which will get the average trader nowhere fast! It's to show that a very small account can be grown into the thousands quickly with relatively little risk to principal. My system ignores peak-to-valleys because the intra-cycle peaks are just profits used to leverage larger trades during winning streaks, which usually occur during ideal conditions. If you can't handle the equity swings, then don't trade at high leverage. It's really that simple, but I don't expect the all-knowing critics to understand the mechanics behind the money management strategy without reading my ebook first. There's a reason it's a best-seller on Amazon.com with tons of 5 star reviews.
What you know-it-all keyboard warriors should be looking at is the profit to draw-down ratio and you can scale it up or down as much as you want. No matter how you slice it, the profit is still 5.8x the max draw-down in only 11 months and that was the largest draw-down since I created this EA in May 2015. If your goal is only 115%+ per year, then use 1/3 the leverage I did and the max draw-down would have only been 17%. It's all relative and the draw-down was acceptable to me because I know the history and power of this EA. Aside from the that, I was trading beyond my maximum recommended leverage at the time of the max draw-down because it was an amount that could be easily replenished if lost. I do not recommend trading at very high leverage on large accounts, which is why I'm gradually decreasing the leverage ratio after each profit spike. If you want to grow a small account quickly, this is a great EA to do it with.