Tasukigap Strategy2 (bei tasukigap)
Der Benutzer hat dieses System gelöscht.
Tasukigap Strategy2 Diskussion
Nov 07, 2010 at 14:15
bogdan11 posted:
does tasukigap EA has a website ? I don't seem to find one
yes, i have it
www.tasukigap.com
still in update!
Nov 12, 2010 at 15:40
hi,what's the difference between the ea on https://www.myfxbook.com/members/tasukigap/tasukigap-strt1/63147 and on https://www.myfxbook.com/members/tasukigap/tasukigap-ea/53898?
the new account seems more safe.
the new account seems more safe.
Mitglied seit Feb 16, 2010
1332 Posts
Nov 18, 2010 at 07:05
tasukigap posted:
So far great result!!
So far great but way overleveraged. What happened with the commercial release?
"In trading, winning is frequently a question of luck, but losing is always a matter of skill."
Mitglied seit Feb 16, 2010
1332 Posts
Nov 18, 2010 at 08:06
(bearbeitet Nov 18, 2010 at 08:07)
ForexPro posted:
So far no backtest?😉
So far I agree with you although I don't rely on backtest.😎
What I've seen so far is this EA has potential for a steady winner but only if used the right way. By right way I mean at least 1:500 leverage, much larger account and 0.01 start lot. That way it could have nice regular pofit of 8-9%/month. Right now it has twice entered 7-th cycle of martingale which is quite bad and in order to use it safely we should be prepared for 14 cycles(80 lots trade😲). But then it makes no sense anymore because we're talking of at least 25-30k account and as far as I know there are few persons who would use martingale based EA on 25k account.
The present forward test is not realistic at all. 90% monthly profit is nice but not if 1-2 more cycles would lead you to a margin call.
"In trading, winning is frequently a question of luck, but losing is always a matter of skill."
Nov 18, 2010 at 15:57
forexma posted:
ForexPro posted:
So far no backtest?😉
So far I agree with you although I don't rely on backtest.😎
What I've seen so far is this EA has potential for a steady winner but only if used the right way. By right way I mean at least 1:500 leverage, much larger account and 0.01 start lot. That way it could have nice regular pofit of 8-9%/month. Right now it has twice entered 7-th cycle of martingale which is quite bad and in order to use it safely we should be prepared for 14 cycles(80 lots trade😲). But then it makes no sense anymore because we're talking of at least 25-30k account and as far as I know there are few persons who would use martingale based EA on 25k account.
The present forward test is not realistic at all. 90% monthly profit is nice but not if 1-2 more cycles would lead you to a margin call.
i use leverage 1:100
thanks
Mitglied seit Jan 27, 2010
38 Posts
Nov 18, 2010 at 16:15
forexma posted:The alternative is , withdraw value of initial principal everytime account doubles.
ForexPro posted:
So far no backtest?😉
So far I agree with you although I don't rely on backtest.😎
What I've seen so far is this EA has potential for a steady winner but only if used the right way. By right way I mean at least 1:500 leverage, much larger account and 0.01 start lot. That way it could have nice regular pofit of 8-9%/month. Right now it has twice entered 7-th cycle of martingale which is quite bad and in order to use it safely we should be prepared for 14 cycles(80 lots trade😲). But then it makes no sense anymore because we're talking of at least 25-30k account and as far as I know there are few persons who would use martingale based EA on 25k account.
The present forward test is not realistic at all. 90% monthly profit is nice but not if 1-2 more cycles would lead you to a margin call.
Mitglied seit Feb 16, 2010
1332 Posts
Nov 18, 2010 at 16:17
tasukigap posted:
forexma posted:
ForexPro posted:
So far no backtest?😉
So far I agree with you although I don't rely on backtest.😎
What I've seen so far is this EA has potential for a steady winner but only if used the right way. By right way I mean at least 1:500 leverage, much larger account and 0.01 start lot. That way it could have nice regular pofit of 8-9%/month. Right now it has twice entered 7-th cycle of martingale which is quite bad and in order to use it safely we should be prepared for 14 cycles(80 lots trade😲). But then it makes no sense anymore because we're talking of at least 25-30k account and as far as I know there are few persons who would use martingale based EA on 25k account.
The present forward test is not realistic at all. 90% monthly profit is nice but not if 1-2 more cycles would lead you to a margin call.
i use leverage 1:100
thanks
I'm very curious how can you open 6.4 lots trade on 4k account with 1:100 everage. Please explain.
"In trading, winning is frequently a question of luck, but losing is always a matter of skill."
Mitglied seit Sep 04, 2009
879 Posts
Nov 18, 2010 at 16:28
forexma posted:
ForexPro posted:
So far no backtest?😉
So far I agree with you although I don't rely on backtest.😎
What I've seen so far is this EA has potential for a steady winner but only if used the right way. By right way I mean at least 1:500 leverage, much larger account and 0.01 start lot. That way it could have nice regular pofit of 8-9%/month. Right now it has twice entered 7-th cycle of martingale which is quite bad and in order to use it safely we should be prepared for 14 cycles(80 lots trade😲). But then it makes no sense anymore because we're talking of at least 25-30k account and as far as I know there are few persons who would use martingale based EA on 25k account.
The present forward test is not realistic at all. 90% monthly profit is nice but not if 1-2 more cycles would lead you to a margin call.
There is NO way around to make the 10y. backtest, especially when it comes to trade real money with a marty EA. When the system goes well on it, double or triple your initial capital and you will be safer than w/o backtest.
Nov 18, 2010 at 16:37
forexma posted:
tasukigap posted:
forexma posted:
ForexPro posted:
So far no backtest?😉
So far I agree with you although I don't rely on backtest.😎
What I've seen so far is this EA has potential for a steady winner but only if used the right way. By right way I mean at least 1:500 leverage, much larger account and 0.01 start lot. That way it could have nice regular pofit of 8-9%/month. Right now it has twice entered 7-th cycle of martingale which is quite bad and in order to use it safely we should be prepared for 14 cycles(80 lots trade😲). But then it makes no sense anymore because we're talking of at least 25-30k account and as far as I know there are few persons who would use martingale based EA on 25k account.
The present forward test is not realistic at all. 90% monthly profit is nice but not if 1-2 more cycles would lead you to a margin call.
i use leverage 1:100
thanks
I'm very curious how can you open 6.4 lots trade on 4k account with 1:100 everage. Please explain.
the open position is in hedg one
Mitglied seit Feb 16, 2010
1332 Posts
Nov 18, 2010 at 16:50
tasukigap posted:
the open position is in hedg one
Maybe my calculations are wrong for which I want to apologise. My problem is I've never used similar hedging technology so I don't know how exactly the broker calculates the free margin.
"In trading, winning is frequently a question of luck, but losing is always a matter of skill."
Mitglied seit Jul 21, 2010
106 Posts
Nov 18, 2010 at 23:17
fairfun posted:
hi,what's the difference between the ea on https://www.myfxbook.com/members/tasukigap/tasukigap-strt1/63147 and on https://www.myfxbook.com/members/tasukigap/tasukigap-ea/53898?
the new account seems more safe.
yea, the new accounts looks safer. the same EA but traded in different time period(sections)
