Midaz Deo
Ganancia : | +11694.54% |
Disminución | 9.83% |
Pips: | 5075.1 |
Transacciones | 552 |
Ganado: |
|
Perdido: |
|
Tipo: | Real |
Apalancamiento: | 1:100 |
Trading: | Manual |
Edit Your Comment
Discusión Midaz Deo
Miembro desde Jan 05, 2016
posts 1189
Nov 22, 2019 at 09:44
Miembro desde Jan 05, 2016
posts 1189
antylossgrid posted:Professional4X posted:novichekms posted:sergeyclubfx posted:
What strategy use here?
Best safe real system.
One-time open only one order, two stop-loss + reverse close.
98% profit
This system doesn't produce 98% profit. Stop lying and stop using multiple accounts to post for yourself on it.
How do you know about this?
It's a fact the system doesn't have a 98% profit ratio.
I don't have to do anything to prove my point, it's a fact and it's right there on your stats page.

Longs Won: (193/248) 77%
Shorts Won: (211/302) 69%
Using the basic math formula of: ( 77 + 69 ) / 2 = 73% average profit ratio
Basic math doesn't lie, and you shouldn't either.
Miembro desde Jan 05, 2016
posts 1189
Nov 24, 2019 at 20:51
Miembro desde Jan 05, 2016
posts 1189
Miembro desde Jan 05, 2016
posts 1189
Nov 24, 2019 at 21:07
Miembro desde Jan 05, 2016
posts 1189
It would be really easy to prove me absolutely wrong.
Provide the read only investors account information so we can publicly validate it.
There is no risk to your account by providing this information unless of course you know you are being dishonest.
Refusing to provide it, supports the fact that you are dishonest and your account isn't what you are making it out to be.
You say 98% profits?
Look at your stats page. Basic math doesn't lie.
So are you going to provide it for public validation?
Provide the read only investors account information so we can publicly validate it.
There is no risk to your account by providing this information unless of course you know you are being dishonest.
Refusing to provide it, supports the fact that you are dishonest and your account isn't what you are making it out to be.
You say 98% profits?
Look at your stats page. Basic math doesn't lie.
So are you going to provide it for public validation?
Miembro desde Jan 05, 2016
posts 1189
Nov 25, 2019 at 08:43
Miembro desde Jan 05, 2016
posts 1189
The account report you presented is absolutely NOT from this account.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/PT1319/midaz-deo/3191722
Here is absolute proof.

The report you say is from this account clearly it is from a different account.

The stats are vastly different and cannot be from the same account.
Be honest.
Miembro desde Jan 05, 2016
posts 1189
Nov 25, 2019 at 22:09
Miembro desde Jan 05, 2016
posts 1189
The trader presented them as being from the account with 98% profits.
I present only the facts.
The report is simply not from the same account.
This account on this stats page does not have 98% profits.
That is all. Nothing more.
High risk little to no money management, hidden history and users that present the account as being something it is not.
This entire issue could be easily resolve by providing the read only investor account information so we can publicly verify the trading results. There is nothing to fear from providing this information, and it would only serve to benefit the investor because it would prove what they are doing is realistic. Otherwise, it's subject to extreme scrutiny and without proof of being what they say it is, one can only consider the account to be unrealistic, and considering the facts being presented clearly show the account as being extremely questionable at best.
I present only the facts.
The report is simply not from the same account.
This account on this stats page does not have 98% profits.
That is all. Nothing more.
High risk little to no money management, hidden history and users that present the account as being something it is not.
This entire issue could be easily resolve by providing the read only investor account information so we can publicly verify the trading results. There is nothing to fear from providing this information, and it would only serve to benefit the investor because it would prove what they are doing is realistic. Otherwise, it's subject to extreme scrutiny and without proof of being what they say it is, one can only consider the account to be unrealistic, and considering the facts being presented clearly show the account as being extremely questionable at best.
Miembro desde Jun 27, 2014
posts 103
Miembro desde Jun 27, 2014
posts 103
Miembro desde May 08, 2018
posts 2
Miembro desde Jun 27, 2014
posts 103
Dec 27, 2019 at 08:07
Miembro desde Jun 27, 2014
posts 103
Piter_Veisman posted:fastdrive55 posted:
The track record is not verfied. So there is something not right here.
The track record has always been verified, it will tell any of the 300 users who monitor the system.
They just changed the access password.
It is also impossible to confirm privileges without verified the track record.
I cannot follow this. myfxbook definitely shows 'Track Record Not Verified'. One should just read and look at the numbers. More is not required. And - yes - there is for sure a reason the user DOES NOT (or cannot) verify the track record.
Miembro desde Jun 27, 2014
posts 103
Dec 29, 2019 at 15:52
Miembro desde Jun 27, 2014
posts 103
nicolasheinekenn posted:fastdrive55 posted:Piter_Veisman posted:fastdrive55 posted:
The track record is not verfied. So there is something not right here.
The track record has always been verified, it will tell any of the 300 users who monitor the system.
They just changed the access password.
It is also impossible to confirm privileges without verified the track record.
I cannot follow this. myfxbook definitely shows 'Track Record Not Verified'. One should just read and look at the numbers. More is not required. And - yes - there is for sure a reason the user DOES NOT (or cannot) verify the track record.
Who called you here?
You don’t even have a real account
Yes, people sent me here... I haven't discovered this here myself.
It is not about my account. I don't sell anything and my EA is strictly private. And it is verified, btw.
Yes, I also don't trade during the X-Mas / New YEar season. But I don't disconnect my account from MyFxbook. Simple, isn't it.
Miembro desde Oct 27, 2013
posts 1

forex_trader_783914
Miembro desde Sep 14, 2019
posts 40
Jan 10, 2020 at 01:07
Miembro desde Sep 14, 2019
posts 40
fastdrive55 posted:You absolutely right, their system obviously dead!Piter_Veisman posted:fastdrive55 posted:
The track record is not verfied. So there is something not right here.
The track record has always been verified, it will tell any of the 300 users who monitor the system.
They just changed the access password.
It is also impossible to confirm privileges without verified the track record.
I cannot follow this. myfxbook definitely shows 'Track Record Not Verified'. One should just read and look at the numbers. More is not required. And - yes - there is for sure a reason the user DOES NOT (or cannot) verify the track record.
Miembro desde Apr 06, 2018
posts 254
Apr 21, 2020 at 03:56
Miembro desde Apr 06, 2018
posts 254
I can see these people are trying very hard to sell there EA by showing trackrecord of other people. Anyone do little research and find that these people are same selling multiple EA by showing successful trackrecord of other people.

*El uso comercial y el spam no serán tolerados y pueden resultar en el cierre de la cuenta.
Consejo: Al publicar una imagen o una URL de YouTube, ésta se integrará automáticamente en su mensaje!
Consejo: Escriba el signo @ para completar automáticamente un nombre de usuario que participa en esta discusión.