Advertisement
Midaz Deo
| Gewinn : | +11694.54% |
| Drawdown | 9.83% |
| Pips: | 5075.1 |
| Trades | 552 |
| Gewonnen: |
|
| Verloren: |
|
| Typ: | Real |
| Hebel: | 1:100 |
| Trading: | Manuell |
Midaz Deo Diskussion
Mitglied seit Jan 05, 2016
1097 Posts
Nov 22, 2019 at 09:44
antylossgrid posted:Professional4X posted:novichekms posted:sergeyclubfx posted:
What strategy use here?
Best safe real system.
One-time open only one order, two stop-loss + reverse close.
98% profit
This system doesn't produce 98% profit. Stop lying and stop using multiple accounts to post for yourself on it.
How do you know about this?
It's a fact the system doesn't have a 98% profit ratio.
I don't have to do anything to prove my point, it's a fact and it's right there on your stats page.
Longs Won: (193/248) 77%
Shorts Won: (211/302) 69%
Using the basic math formula of: ( 77 + 69 ) / 2 = 73% average profit ratio
Basic math doesn't lie, and you shouldn't either.
Anhänge:
Mitglied seit Jan 05, 2016
1097 Posts
Nov 24, 2019 at 20:51
antylossgrid posted:
Strategy tester reports mean NOTHING, anyone can generate a report like that.
The real stats on on the stats page and reveal the truth about the account.
Mitglied seit Jan 05, 2016
1097 Posts
Nov 24, 2019 at 21:07
It would be really easy to prove me absolutely wrong.
Provide the read only investors account information so we can publicly validate it.
There is no risk to your account by providing this information unless of course you know you are being dishonest.
Refusing to provide it, supports the fact that you are dishonest and your account isn't what you are making it out to be.
You say 98% profits?
Look at your stats page. Basic math doesn't lie.
So are you going to provide it for public validation?
Provide the read only investors account information so we can publicly validate it.
There is no risk to your account by providing this information unless of course you know you are being dishonest.
Refusing to provide it, supports the fact that you are dishonest and your account isn't what you are making it out to be.
You say 98% profits?
Look at your stats page. Basic math doesn't lie.
So are you going to provide it for public validation?
Mitglied seit Jan 05, 2016
1097 Posts
Nov 25, 2019 at 08:43
The account report you presented is absolutely NOT from this account.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/PT1319/midaz-deo/3191722
Here is absolute proof.
The report you say is from this account clearly it is from a different account.
The stats are vastly different and cannot be from the same account.
Be honest.
Anhänge:
Mitglied seit Jan 05, 2016
1097 Posts
Nov 25, 2019 at 22:09
The trader presented them as being from the account with 98% profits.
I present only the facts.
The report is simply not from the same account.
This account on this stats page does not have 98% profits.
That is all. Nothing more.
High risk little to no money management, hidden history and users that present the account as being something it is not.
This entire issue could be easily resolve by providing the read only investor account information so we can publicly verify the trading results. There is nothing to fear from providing this information, and it would only serve to benefit the investor because it would prove what they are doing is realistic. Otherwise, it's subject to extreme scrutiny and without proof of being what they say it is, one can only consider the account to be unrealistic, and considering the facts being presented clearly show the account as being extremely questionable at best.
I present only the facts.
The report is simply not from the same account.
This account on this stats page does not have 98% profits.
That is all. Nothing more.
High risk little to no money management, hidden history and users that present the account as being something it is not.
This entire issue could be easily resolve by providing the read only investor account information so we can publicly verify the trading results. There is nothing to fear from providing this information, and it would only serve to benefit the investor because it would prove what they are doing is realistic. Otherwise, it's subject to extreme scrutiny and without proof of being what they say it is, one can only consider the account to be unrealistic, and considering the facts being presented clearly show the account as being extremely questionable at best.
Mitglied seit Jun 27, 2014
98 Posts
Dec 02, 2019 at 09:51
Professional4X convinced me (again). The smooth growth curve is too good to be true. And that combined with the fact, that a fishy broker is involved, marks this a no-no to me.
Mitglied seit Jun 27, 2014
98 Posts
Dec 24, 2019 at 16:58
The track record is not verfied. So there is something not right here.
Mitglied seit May 08, 2018
2 Posts
Dec 27, 2019 at 05:22
This is very high risk. Should trade for yourself
Mitglied seit Jun 27, 2014
98 Posts
Dec 27, 2019 at 08:07
Piter_Veisman posted:fastdrive55 posted:
The track record is not verfied. So there is something not right here.
The track record has always been verified, it will tell any of the 300 users who monitor the system.
They just changed the access password.
It is also impossible to confirm privileges without verified the track record.
I cannot follow this. myfxbook definitely shows 'Track Record Not Verified'. One should just read and look at the numbers. More is not required. And - yes - there is for sure a reason the user DOES NOT (or cannot) verify the track record.
Mitglied seit Jun 27, 2014
98 Posts
Dec 29, 2019 at 15:52
nicolasheinekenn posted:fastdrive55 posted:Piter_Veisman posted:fastdrive55 posted:
The track record is not verfied. So there is something not right here.
The track record has always been verified, it will tell any of the 300 users who monitor the system.
They just changed the access password.
It is also impossible to confirm privileges without verified the track record.
I cannot follow this. myfxbook definitely shows 'Track Record Not Verified'. One should just read and look at the numbers. More is not required. And - yes - there is for sure a reason the user DOES NOT (or cannot) verify the track record.
Who called you here?
You don’t even have a real account
Yes, people sent me here... I haven't discovered this here myself.
It is not about my account. I don't sell anything and my EA is strictly private. And it is verified, btw.
Yes, I also don't trade during the X-Mas / New YEar season. But I don't disconnect my account from MyFxbook. Simple, isn't it.
Mitglied seit Oct 27, 2013
1 Posts
Jan 07, 2020 at 19:39
(bearbeitet Jan 07, 2020 at 19:39)
Nice
forex_trader_783914
Mitglied seit Sep 14, 2019
24 Posts
Jan 10, 2020 at 01:07
fastdrive55 posted:Piter_Veisman posted:fastdrive55 posted:
The track record is not verfied. So there is something not right here.
The track record has always been verified, it will tell any of the 300 users who monitor the system.
They just changed the access password.
It is also impossible to confirm privileges without verified the track record.
I cannot follow this. myfxbook definitely shows 'Track Record Not Verified'. One should just read and look at the numbers. More is not required. And - yes - there is for sure a reason the user DOES NOT (or cannot) verify the track record.
You absolutely right, their system obviously dead!
Mitglied seit Apr 06, 2018
242 Posts
Apr 21, 2020 at 03:56
I can see these people are trying very hard to sell there EA by showing trackrecord of other people. Anyone do little research and find that these people are same selling multiple EA by showing successful trackrecord of other people.
*Kommerzielle Nutzung und Spam werden nicht toleriert und können zur Kündigung des Kontos führen.
Tipp: Wenn Sie ein Bild/eine Youtube-Url posten, wird diese automatisch in Ihren Beitrag eingebettet!
Tipp: Tippen Sie das @-Zeichen ein, um einen an dieser Diskussion teilnehmenden Benutzernamen automatisch zu vervollständigen.
