Midaz Deo
กำไร : | +11694.54% |
ขาดทุนสะสม | 9.83% |
pips: | 5075.1 |
การเทรด | 552 |
ได้กำไร : |
|
ขาดทุน : |
|
ประเภท : | จริง |
เลเวอเรจ: | 1:100 |
การเทรด : | คู่มือ |
|
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 21 2019 at 12:01
Massive gains with trading history hidden.
See this link for more information why this is concerning.
https://www.myfxbook.com/community/general/how-recognize-forex-scammer/1645261,1
See this link for more information why this is concerning.
https://www.myfxbook.com/community/general/how-recognize-forex-scammer/1645261,1
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 21 2019 at 14:54
The problem is you are showing massive gains on an account which appears to be a live account, but you are unable and/or unwilling to fully validate the account to prove it is a real account.
Also the trading history is hidden, which is concerning for obvious reasons.
Please fully validate the account. There is no legitimate reason as to why someone would refuse to fully validate their account.
Unless of course the account isn't actually a live account, or perhaps the account might not actually belong to you.
Can you validate the account?
Also the trading history is hidden, which is concerning for obvious reasons.
Please fully validate the account. There is no legitimate reason as to why someone would refuse to fully validate their account.
Unless of course the account isn't actually a live account, or perhaps the account might not actually belong to you.
Can you validate the account?
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 21 2019 at 15:17
sanypresly posted:
The account for more than 4 years has been fully verified!
Open an account.
Ask anyone who monitors the system.
Statistics are easily manipulated. This is why it's important to have full transparency and a validated account.
It isn't paranoid to expect someone who is trading money for others to have those things.
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 21 2019 at 15:30
sanypresly posted:Professional4X posted:
The problem is you are showing massive gains on an account which appears to be a live account, but you are unable and/or unwilling to fully validate the account to prove it is a real account.
1. Account and so real
3. Open yourself at least a demo account, we will discuss your trade, 'professional' 😂
1) Prove it's a real account, fully validate it and allow people to review the trading history. You say it's real, fine, validate the account.
2) Why do you feel the need to use multiple new accounts to defend a statistics page that isn't even registered to you? The trading account belongs to PT1319, and yet you are using 'sanypresly' and other accounts to post messages defending it and such. Using multiple accounts to discuss an the trading and such on this account, which may not even belong to you is extremely questionable at best.
3) This isn't about my trading accounts, this is about THIS specific account which has an unrealistic profit level and you are unable to fully validate it.
Prove this is a legitimate live account. Please fully validate the account and open the trading history for review.
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 21 2019 at 15:32
sanypresly posted:
Many systems have not been fully verified this week. This is the Myfxbook bug.
You just need to renew the investor password in the office of your portfolio.
Then please do that. Fully validate the account and show the trading history.
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 21 2019 at 15:36
sanypresly posted:
Many systems have not been fully verified this week. This is the Myfxbook bug.
You just need to renew the investor password in the office of your portfolio.
Provide us the read only investor password so we can verify the trading history.
There is no risk to provide this information.
LionelAlien posted:Brien posted:I totally agree with you. I lost $545. PayPal never wanted to pay me back.
And that's not all. On FPA is possible be found the Police Report. This is no possible hidden under the carpet!
https://www.nexontglobal.com/single-post/2017/03/01/Pruton-Capital-in-Bank-Negara-Malaysia-BNM-alert-list
https://www.sc.com.my/regulation/enforcement/investor-alerts/sc-investor-alerts/list-of-unauthorised-websites-investment-products-companies-individuals
https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/threads/guilty-case-2016-169-elaine007-vs-prutoncapital-com.47452/
https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/attachments/wcp-police-report_all-pdf.27989/
@LionelAlien bought it and was seen to be deceived.
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 22 2019 at 01:02
novichekms posted:sergeyclubfx posted:
What strategy use here?
Best safe real system.
One-time open only one order, two stop-loss + reverse close.
98% profit
This system doesn't produce 98% profit. Stop lying and stop using multiple accounts to post for yourself on it.
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 22 2019 at 01:04
novichekms posted:Professional4X posted:
Massive gains with trading history hidden.
See this link for more information why this is concerning.
https://www.myfxbook.com/community/general/how-recognize-forex-scammer/1645261,1
Write yourself in this thread
I'm not the one with multiple user accounts posting attacks.
Stop. Just stop.
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 22 2019 at 01:24
Brien posted:
And that's not all. On FPA is possible be found the Police Report. This is no possible hidden under the carpet!
https://www.nexontglobal.com/single-post/2017/03/01/Pruton-Capital-in-Bank-Negara-Malaysia-BNM-alert-list
https://www.sc.com.my/regulation/enforcement/investor-alerts/sc-investor-alerts/list-of-unauthorised-websites-investment-products-companies-individuals
https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/threads/guilty-case-2016-169-elaine007-vs-prutoncapital-com.47452/
https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/attachments/wcp-police-report_all-pdf.27989/
I have over 30+ years Quant + Tech experience in the industry and we see scams on a daily basis where people have been ripped off by their brokerage and investment managers who are incapable of being honest with their clients.
There are NUMEROUS complaints and reports which have been filed against the brokerage associated with this trading account.
The brokerage has been proven to act in a fraudulent manner whereby they have scammed numerous people out of their investments.
This is why it is important to always have a highly regulated brokerage that has a guarantee of asset protections and absolute transparency for client funds and historical trading associated with said accounts and funds.
There is no legitimate reason as to why an investment manager cannot fully validate their trading account and/or provide the read only investor account information for said accounts, unless of course the trading account isn't really theirs, or it isn't a real 'Live' account but rather a demo account which has been used to try and make it appear as though it is a live account.
Simply look at the facts.
Highly questionable brokerage + 'Live' investment accounts which cannot be validated properly + a hidden trading history?
It's an extremely concerning situation.
A situation which can be easily resolved by providing the complete viewable trading history for the account and fully validating it.
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 22 2019 at 01:29
https://www.sc.com.my/regulation/enforcement/investor-alerts/sc-investor-alerts/list-of-unauthorised-websites-investment-products-companies-individuals
In addition, you should be fully aware of that the broker in question has been listed as unauthorized to conduct investment services.
To clarify 'Unauthorized', this means they are NOT permitted to provide financial services.
Definition: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/unauthorized
They're operating illegally.
In addition, you should be fully aware of that the broker in question has been listed as unauthorized to conduct investment services.
To clarify 'Unauthorized', this means they are NOT permitted to provide financial services.
Definition: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/unauthorized
They're operating illegally.
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 22 2019 at 09:44
antylossgrid posted:Professional4X posted:novichekms posted:sergeyclubfx posted:
What strategy use here?
Best safe real system.
One-time open only one order, two stop-loss + reverse close.
98% profit
This system doesn't produce 98% profit. Stop lying and stop using multiple accounts to post for yourself on it.
How do you know about this?
It's a fact the system doesn't have a 98% profit ratio.
I don't have to do anything to prove my point, it's a fact and it's right there on your stats page.

Longs Won: (193/248) 77%
Shorts Won: (211/302) 69%
Using the basic math formula of: ( 77 + 69 ) / 2 = 73% average profit ratio
Basic math doesn't lie, and you shouldn't either.
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 24 2019 at 20:51
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 24 2019 at 21:07
It would be really easy to prove me absolutely wrong.
Provide the read only investors account information so we can publicly validate it.
There is no risk to your account by providing this information unless of course you know you are being dishonest.
Refusing to provide it, supports the fact that you are dishonest and your account isn't what you are making it out to be.
You say 98% profits?
Look at your stats page. Basic math doesn't lie.
So are you going to provide it for public validation?
Provide the read only investors account information so we can publicly validate it.
There is no risk to your account by providing this information unless of course you know you are being dishonest.
Refusing to provide it, supports the fact that you are dishonest and your account isn't what you are making it out to be.
You say 98% profits?
Look at your stats page. Basic math doesn't lie.
So are you going to provide it for public validation?
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 25 2019 at 08:43
The account report you presented is absolutely NOT from this account.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/PT1319/midaz-deo/3191722
Here is absolute proof.

The report you say is from this account clearly it is from a different account.

The stats are vastly different and cannot be from the same account.
Be honest.
Professional4X
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1189 โพสต์
Nov 25 2019 at 22:09
The trader presented them as being from the account with 98% profits.
I present only the facts.
The report is simply not from the same account.
This account on this stats page does not have 98% profits.
That is all. Nothing more.
High risk little to no money management, hidden history and users that present the account as being something it is not.
This entire issue could be easily resolve by providing the read only investor account information so we can publicly verify the trading results. There is nothing to fear from providing this information, and it would only serve to benefit the investor because it would prove what they are doing is realistic. Otherwise, it's subject to extreme scrutiny and without proof of being what they say it is, one can only consider the account to be unrealistic, and considering the facts being presented clearly show the account as being extremely questionable at best.
I present only the facts.
The report is simply not from the same account.
This account on this stats page does not have 98% profits.
That is all. Nothing more.
High risk little to no money management, hidden history and users that present the account as being something it is not.
This entire issue could be easily resolve by providing the read only investor account information so we can publicly verify the trading results. There is nothing to fear from providing this information, and it would only serve to benefit the investor because it would prove what they are doing is realistic. Otherwise, it's subject to extreme scrutiny and without proof of being what they say it is, one can only consider the account to be unrealistic, and considering the facts being presented clearly show the account as being extremely questionable at best.
Professional4X convinced me (again). The smooth growth curve is too good to be true. And that combined with the fact, that a fishy broker is involved, marks this a no-no to me.