Forex Growth Bot
收益: | +2644.71% |
縮減 | 94.46% |
點: | 8075.5 |
交易 | 2881 |
贏得: |
|
損失:。 |
|
類型: | 真實 |
杠杆率: | 1:200 |
交易: | 自動的 |
Edit Your Comment
Forex Growth Bot討論
Jun 04, 2011 at 10:01
會員從Oct 01, 2010開始
27帖子
Pakfx posted:
can you please share us in details what setting with what EA you are using ?
Actually I only tried to catch the trends earlier with 9,69,1.7 and I don´t use Swiss Army for trailing, because FGB trails good enough...I use Swiss Army only to set a safety SL to 50 pips in order to be double sure, that my account is save.
Jun 04, 2011 at 10:05
會員從Oct 01, 2010開始
27帖子
id===== Identity Settings ====
Symbol_Specific=0
MagicNum_Specific=1
MagicNumber=123456
SelectiveScan=0
RequireAllConditions=0
cond===== Conditions: General ====
Immediate_Activation=1
Time_Activation=0
Time_Hour=23
Time_Minute=55
Minimum_FreeMargin=0
FreeMargin_LessThan=0
pro_cond===== Conditions: Profit-Based ====
MaxProfit_Dollar=0
MaxProfit_Pip=0
MaxProfit_Percent=0
loss_cond===== Conditions: Loss-Based ====
MaxLoss_Dollar=0
MaxLoss_Pip=0
MaxLoss_Percent=0
action===== Actions: General ====
CloseOrders=0
HedgeOrders=0
mod_action===== Actions: Modify Orders ====
SetTakeProfit=0
SetStoploss=1
RemoveTakeProfit=0
RemoveStoploss=0
input_action===== Action Inputs ====
TakeProfit=0
Stoploss=500
otype===== Order Types: Standard ====
Allow_All_Types=1
Buy_Active=0
Sell_Active=0
Buy_Stop=0
Sell_Stop=0
Buy_Limit=0
Sell_Limit=0
manage===== Stop Management ====
BreakEvenAt=0
BreakEvenSlide=0
TrailingStop=0
OnlyTrailProfits=0
extra===== Extra Settings ====
ExpertName=Swiss Army EA
Disable_Comments=1
Slippage=3
sep==============================
author=Programming: Ryan Klefas
contact=Email: [email protected]
web=Website: www.forex-tsd.com
Symbol_Specific=0
MagicNum_Specific=1
MagicNumber=123456
SelectiveScan=0
RequireAllConditions=0
cond===== Conditions: General ====
Immediate_Activation=1
Time_Activation=0
Time_Hour=23
Time_Minute=55
Minimum_FreeMargin=0
FreeMargin_LessThan=0
pro_cond===== Conditions: Profit-Based ====
MaxProfit_Dollar=0
MaxProfit_Pip=0
MaxProfit_Percent=0
loss_cond===== Conditions: Loss-Based ====
MaxLoss_Dollar=0
MaxLoss_Pip=0
MaxLoss_Percent=0
action===== Actions: General ====
CloseOrders=0
HedgeOrders=0
mod_action===== Actions: Modify Orders ====
SetTakeProfit=0
SetStoploss=1
RemoveTakeProfit=0
RemoveStoploss=0
input_action===== Action Inputs ====
TakeProfit=0
Stoploss=500
otype===== Order Types: Standard ====
Allow_All_Types=1
Buy_Active=0
Sell_Active=0
Buy_Stop=0
Sell_Stop=0
Buy_Limit=0
Sell_Limit=0
manage===== Stop Management ====
BreakEvenAt=0
BreakEvenSlide=0
TrailingStop=0
OnlyTrailProfits=0
extra===== Extra Settings ====
ExpertName=Swiss Army EA
Disable_Comments=1
Slippage=3
sep==============================
author=Programming: Ryan Klefas
contact=Email: [email protected]
web=Website: www.forex-tsd.com
Jun 04, 2011 at 13:40
會員從Mar 31, 2010開始
79帖子
ralle,
nice results with 9, 69, 1.7... congrat :)
would you make 5 years backtest with both settings please
so we could see if this setting works in the long run
you can make backtest much faster if you choose "open price only" because fgb opens and closes trades after candle close on eu M15 chart so you don't need to test on "every tick"
thx
nice results with 9, 69, 1.7... congrat :)
would you make 5 years backtest with both settings please
so we could see if this setting works in the long run
you can make backtest much faster if you choose "open price only" because fgb opens and closes trades after candle close on eu M15 chart so you don't need to test on "every tick"
thx

forex_trader_12567
會員從May 29, 2010開始
258帖子
Jun 04, 2011 at 15:25
會員從May 29, 2010開始
258帖子
ralle posted:
aryaforex posted:
ralle posted:
...anyway...FGB is one of the best ones actually...maybe we can improve it a little bit with "ManualTradeControl=true" and a second trade-manager-EA like Swiss Army, if we are not able to sit in front of the screen all day long ;-))
oh, a little bit closer then my wish EA. this EA won't open a trade, only modify the existing trades.. still searching free EA that can order the opposite way each time FGB make any order. would any one ever know this EA?
wait, at ver1.51, there is setting to open the hedge, curious the mechanism. if it open opposite way after FGB order, it should be 2 winning trades, first from swiss army, second from FGB :)
If an EA needs hedging or martingale, then the trading-logic sucks...the entries of FGB are a bit late sometimes - but they are good - they catches the trend mostly. It´s not easy to find settings, witch catch the trend earlier. As I mentioned before, I use 9,69,1.7 actually. Here are two screenshots - one of mine settings and one of the default ones:
i hate seeing the DD Bro.. sorry
Jun 04, 2011 at 18:12
(已編輯Jun 04, 2011 at 18:30)
會員從Oct 01, 2010開始
27帖子
sliffy posted:
ralle,
nice results with 9, 69, 1.7... congrat :)
would you make 5 years backtest with both settings please
so we could see if this setting works in the long run
you can make backtest much faster if you choose "open price only" because fgb opens and closes trades after candle close on eu M15 chart so you don't need to test on "every tick"
thx
OK...but I have only good tickdata for 3 years...as a conclusion...9/69/1.7 generates more or less 20 % more profit with slightly more drawdown and less, precicer trades...of course the DD depends on the lotsize...anyway it´s quite an alternative setting, if the default ones are in an unlucky period ;-))
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOTSIZE 0.01 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
>
>


>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOTSIZE 0.10 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
>
>


>
>
>
> and now it´s enough with the screenshots...it´s a forum - not a cinema ;-))
Jun 04, 2011 at 18:39
會員從Jul 21, 2010開始
119帖子
ralle posted:
sliffy posted:
ralle,
nice results with 9, 69, 1.7... congrat :)
would you make 5 years backtest with both settings please
so we could see if this setting works in the long run
you can make backtest much faster if you choose "open price only" because fgb opens and closes trades after candle close on eu M15 chart so you don't need to test on "every tick"
thx
OK...but I have only good tickdata for 3 years...as a conclusion...9/69/1.7 generates more or less 20 % more profit with slightly more drawdown and less, precicer trades...of course the DD depends on the lotsize...anyway it´s quite an alternative setting, if the default ones are in an unlucky period ;-))
I did a backtes from 2004 with both settings
With default settings:
Maximal drawdown 911.14 (8.53%)
With your settings
Maximal drawdown 1569.30 (15.52%)
As you can see, with your settings the maximal drawdown is almost doubled...
As I said they are good settings (give more profit) but they are more aggressive than default.
You can see it from the equity line:
DEFAULT SETTINGS

YOUR SETTINGS

會員從Apr 13, 2011開始
3帖子
Jun 04, 2011 at 21:00
會員從Oct 01, 2010開始
27帖子
PeterParker posted:
Hi ,
I see an offer to copy this FGB trades on our account for a monthly fees. Does any one already taking this service and any comments on this please ?thx
Hi Peter...to my mind it´s unfair to the developer...honour his work...FGB is worth every penny ! !
Jun 04, 2011 at 21:24
(已編輯Jun 04, 2011 at 21:37)
會員從Oct 01, 2010開始
27帖子
I did a backtes from 2004 with both settings
With default settings:
Maximal drawdown 911.14 (8.53%)
With your settings
Maximal drawdown 1569.30 (15.52%)
As you can see, with your settings the maximal drawdown is almost doubled...
As I said they are good settings (give more profit) but they are more aggressive than default.
You can see it from the equity line:
DEFAULT SETTINGS

YOUR SETTINGS

Thanks Dave...what I can see is, that there is an unspectacular period from 2005 to 2008 with nearly no gain ... especially with default settings...any thoughts why ?
I think this is a good proof that EA´s always need to be improved according to the current behavior of the currencies...
Jun 04, 2011 at 22:22
會員從Jul 21, 2010開始
119帖子
nothing is perfect, anyway settings with this flat curve from 2006 to 2008 save your account from a bigger drawdown.
Ex with default settings max drawdown with 0.1 lots is 911 euro
with 9-69-1.7 settings is 1569.
So.... if you run the ea with 2000 eur and 0.1 lot with default settings the max drawdown is 50%, with 9-69-1.7 settings it's about 76%, very very closed to the margin call....
Ex with default settings max drawdown with 0.1 lots is 911 euro
with 9-69-1.7 settings is 1569.
So.... if you run the ea with 2000 eur and 0.1 lot with default settings the max drawdown is 50%, with 9-69-1.7 settings it's about 76%, very very closed to the margin call....
Jun 05, 2011 at 00:25
(已編輯Jun 05, 2011 at 00:28)
會員從Oct 01, 2010開始
27帖子
prototipo posted:
nothing is perfect, anyway settings with this flat curve from 2006 to 2008 save your account from a bigger drawdown.
Ex with default settings max drawdown with 0.1 lots is 911 euro
with 9-69-1.7 settings is 1569.
So.... if you run the ea with 2000 eur and 0.1 lot with default settings the max drawdown is 50%, with 9-69-1.7 settings it's about 76%, very very closed to the margin call....
Backtest depend on broker and datafeed...as you already know...my 3-year BT on AAAFx (ok - not the best broker) look like :
9/69/1.7_____0.10 lots_____1421 DD
DEFAULT_____0.10 lots_____1290 DD
So not a BIG difference there.
To avoid a margin call, risk only max. 2 % per trade.
If we set a SL=50 pips and have 1000 USD equity, one single trade should only burn 2% of 1000 = 20 USD.
If we have a mini account starting with 0.01 lot (1 pip = 10 cent) we can trade therefore with 0.04 lots (1 pip = 40 cent)
50pip SL x 0.04lots = 20 USD
Even if many SL happen in a row...your account is not in danger ;-))
Jun 05, 2011 at 03:54
(已編輯Jun 05, 2011 at 03:55)
會員從May 14, 2011開始
25帖子
ralle posted:
prototipo posted:
nothing is perfect, anyway settings with this flat curve from 2006 to 2008 save your account from a bigger drawdown.
Ex with default settings max drawdown with 0.1 lots is 911 euro
with 9-69-1.7 settings is 1569.
So.... if you run the ea with 2000 eur and 0.1 lot with default settings the max drawdown is 50%, with 9-69-1.7 settings it's about 76%, very very closed to the margin call....
Backtest depend on broker and datafeed...as you already know...my 3-year BT on AAAFx (ok - not the best broker) look like :
9/69/1.7_____0.10 lots_____1421 DD
DEFAULT_____0.10 lots_____1290 DD
So not a BIG difference there.
To avoid a margin call, risk only max. 2 % per trade.
If we set a SL=50 pips and have 1000 USD equity, one single trade should only burn 2% of 1000 = 20 USD.
If we have a mini account starting with 0.01 lot (1 pip = 10 cent) we can trade therefore with 0.04 lots (1 pip = 40 cent)
50pip SL x 0.04lots = 20 USD
Even if many SL happen in a row...your account is not in danger ;-))
Hi Ralle , can i know what version you use ? basic ? advance ? power ? version 1.5 ?
Jun 05, 2011 at 05:46
會員從Mar 31, 2010開始
79帖子
ralle posted:
PeterParker posted:
Hi ,
I see an offer to copy this FGB trades on our account for a monthly fees. Does any one already taking this service and any comments on this please ?thx
Hi Peter...to my mind it´s unfair to the developer...honour his work...FGB is worth every penny ! !
i guess Peter talks about the developer's copy trade service...
Jun 05, 2011 at 07:10
會員從Oct 01, 2010開始
27帖子
sliffy posted:
ralle posted:
PeterParker posted:
Hi ,
I see an offer to copy this FGB trades on our account for a monthly fees. Does any one already taking this service and any comments on this please ?thx
Hi Peter...to my mind it´s unfair to the developer...honour his work...FGB is worth every penny ! !
i guess Peter talks about the developer's copy trade service...
Sorry Peter...misunderstanding...
Jun 05, 2011 at 22:53
(已編輯Jun 05, 2011 at 22:54)
會員從Apr 15, 2011開始
97帖子
Anyone with the signal service (not fgb 1.5 basic power, or advanced) still riding out the positions that are were open Friday evening? The signal service has been reflecting the trades on here with the exception of last week. So I was curious if the signal service needs are restart on my end or not.

*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。