Inertia Trader (由 babyjake1961)
該使用者已經刪除了這個系統。
Edit Your Comment
Inertia Trader討論
會員從Dec 07, 2009開始
134帖子
Feb 03, 2017 at 14:42
會員從Dec 07, 2009開始
134帖子
babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
Be afraid, very afraid?
會員從Dec 04, 2010開始
1447帖子
Feb 04, 2017 at 01:49
會員從Dec 04, 2010開始
1447帖子
robotchallenge posted:so is the default maximum risk around 10% per trade, and with upto 6 trades possible it's maximum drawdown 60%, so to set maximum risk at 30% drawdown, you would just manually change the lot size to half the default lot size the EA suggests for your account size? I couldn't see under settings anywhere to set a risk per trade, for the EA to then automatically determine the lot size based on this. So as the account balance grows you would have to manually adjust the lot sizing? thanks.babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
會員從Dec 07, 2009開始
134帖子
Feb 04, 2017 at 17:01
會員從Dec 07, 2009開始
134帖子
aeronthomas posted:robotchallenge posted:so is the default maximum risk around 10% per trade, and with upto 6 trades possible it's maximum drawdown 60%, so to set maximum risk at 30% drawdown, you would just manually change the lot size to half the default lot size the EA suggests for your account size? I couldn't see under settings anywhere to set a risk per trade, for the EA to then automatically determine the lot size based on this. So as the account balance grows you would have to manually adjust the lot sizing? thanks.babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
I have mine set at 5% or half of default. I am assuming that 60% DD is achievable if the EA misses a few in a row, just add it up and assume the worse case scenario. And I am not really calculating 60% DD based on just missing 6 trades in one basket, I am more worried about a few baskets in a row, which will happen, and when it does, how will that look? Why the vendors account seems to have such large changes in lot size is a mystery to me since mine are adjusting smoothly with equity.
Be afraid, very afraid?
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子
Feb 05, 2017 at 07:40
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子
robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
Again, what would prevent you from using a smaller lot size if you can't stomach the bigger drawdowns?
會員從May 08, 2012開始
60帖子
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子
Feb 05, 2017 at 08:09
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子
aeronthomas posted:robotchallenge posted:so is the default maximum risk around 10% per trade, and with upto 6 trades possible it's maximum drawdown 60%, so to set maximum risk at 30% drawdown, you would just manually change the lot size to half the default lot size the EA suggests for your account size? I couldn't see under settings anywhere to set a risk per trade, for the EA to then automatically determine the lot size based on this. So as the account balance grows you would have to manually adjust the lot sizing? thanks.babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
Just backtest the EA with different lot sizes to determine your personal risk preferences.
會員從May 08, 2012開始
60帖子
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子
Feb 05, 2017 at 12:25
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子
robotchallenge posted:aeronthomas posted:robotchallenge posted:so is the default maximum risk around 10% per trade, and with upto 6 trades possible it's maximum drawdown 60%, so to set maximum risk at 30% drawdown, you would just manually change the lot size to half the default lot size the EA suggests for your account size? I couldn't see under settings anywhere to set a risk per trade, for the EA to then automatically determine the lot size based on this. So as the account balance grows you would have to manually adjust the lot sizing? thanks.babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
I have mine set at 5% or half of default. I am assuming that 60% DD is achievable if the EA misses a few in a row, just add it up and assume the worse case scenario. And I am not really calculating 60% DD based on just missing 6 trades in one basket, I am more worried about a few baskets in a row, which will happen, and when it does, how will that look? Why the vendors account seems to have such large changes in lot size is a mystery to me since mine are adjusting smoothly with equity.
Risk preferences are a highly individual matter. We are confident about our product and trade our risk capital, so we don't mind bigger drawdowns. Quite a few EA customers like "going all in" for short-term superprofits while others trade what they can't afford to lose. As we don't know who's who, we let them pick their risk levels on their own.
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子
會員從Dec 04, 2010開始
1447帖子
Feb 06, 2017 at 02:47
會員從Dec 04, 2010開始
1447帖子
babyjake1961 posted:It would be very useful to have a max risk per trade setting in % terms so the EA could calculate the lot size for each trade based on the hard SL. Most EAs offer a feature like this. Would save a lot of time, customers really shouldn't have to run back tests to determine lot sizing...robotchallenge posted:aeronthomas posted:robotchallenge posted:so is the default maximum risk around 10% per trade, and with upto 6 trades possible it's maximum drawdown 60%, so to set maximum risk at 30% drawdown, you would just manually change the lot size to half the default lot size the EA suggests for your account size? I couldn't see under settings anywhere to set a risk per trade, for the EA to then automatically determine the lot size based on this. So as the account balance grows you would have to manually adjust the lot sizing? thanks.babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
I have mine set at 5% or half of default. I am assuming that 60% DD is achievable if the EA misses a few in a row, just add it up and assume the worse case scenario. And I am not really calculating 60% DD based on just missing 6 trades in one basket, I am more worried about a few baskets in a row, which will happen, and when it does, how will that look? Why the vendors account seems to have such large changes in lot size is a mystery to me since mine are adjusting smoothly with equity.
Risk preferences are a highly individual matter. We are confident about our product and trade our risk capital, so we don't mind bigger drawdowns. Quite a few EA customers like "going all in" for short-term superprofits while others trade what they can't afford to lose. As we don't know who's who, we let them pick their risk levels on their own.
會員從Aug 16, 2016開始
19帖子
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子
Feb 06, 2017 at 07:23
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子
aeronthomas posted:babyjake1961 posted:It would be very useful to have a max risk per trade setting in % terms so the EA could calculate the lot size for each trade based on the hard SL. Most EAs offer a feature like this. Would save a lot of time, customers really shouldn't have to run back tests to determine lot sizing...robotchallenge posted:aeronthomas posted:robotchallenge posted:so is the default maximum risk around 10% per trade, and with upto 6 trades possible it's maximum drawdown 60%, so to set maximum risk at 30% drawdown, you would just manually change the lot size to half the default lot size the EA suggests for your account size? I couldn't see under settings anywhere to set a risk per trade, for the EA to then automatically determine the lot size based on this. So as the account balance grows you would have to manually adjust the lot sizing? thanks.babyjake1961 posted:robotchallenge posted:babyjake1961 posted:
While the remaining 3 closed in hefty profit.
That is true but the default settings are scary! It will hit 60% drawdown with 10% risk.
Have you backtested the EA? Further, one can set any lot size they like.
I can see by the available live accounts, had the last trades all lost then about a 60% DD would have been easily achievable. A backtest isn't needed to find the obvious. It is inevitable.
I have mine set at 5% or half of default. I am assuming that 60% DD is achievable if the EA misses a few in a row, just add it up and assume the worse case scenario. And I am not really calculating 60% DD based on just missing 6 trades in one basket, I am more worried about a few baskets in a row, which will happen, and when it does, how will that look? Why the vendors account seems to have such large changes in lot size is a mystery to me since mine are adjusting smoothly with equity.
Risk preferences are a highly individual matter. We are confident about our product and trade our risk capital, so we don't mind bigger drawdowns. Quite a few EA customers like "going all in" for short-term superprofits while others trade what they can't afford to lose. As we don't know who's who, we let them pick their risk levels on their own.
There's no hard SL here - it's set dynamically and differs from trade to trade. So what you want is not possible.
會員從May 08, 2012開始
60帖子
Feb 06, 2017 at 07:36
會員從May 08, 2012開始
60帖子
babyjake1961 posted:SleepingFX posted:
Hi, the last 2 trades closed in loss for me. Does anyone have new open trades like this account after NFP yesterday? I got none.
Does your broker have a name?
https://www.fortfs.com/
Fort Financial Services
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子
Feb 06, 2017 at 08:12
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子
SleepingFX posted:babyjake1961 posted:SleepingFX posted:
Hi, the last 2 trades closed in loss for me. Does anyone have new open trades like this account after NFP yesterday? I got none.
Does your broker have a name?
https://www.fortfs.com/
Fort Financial Services
We suggest using the same broker we do (FXChoice) for the same results.
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子
會員從Mar 31, 2016開始
69帖子

*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。